Anxiety, Pregnancy Loss
Conditions
Keywords
Emotional Freedom Technique, Midwifery, Well-Being Status, Cortisol, Music, Prenatal loss, Psychological Development
Brief summary
Emotional freedom technique and music were applied to pregnant women who experienced prenatal loss. Emotional freedom technique group, music group and control groups each consisted of 53 pregnant women.
Detailed description
Aim: The research is conducted to determine for the purpose of the effect of emotional freedom technique and music applied to pregnant women having experienced prenatal loss on psychological development, well-being status, and cortisol level. Material and Method: The research is conducted in a randomized controlled manner with a total of 159 pregnant women who applied to the gynecology outpatient clinics of Elazig Fethi Sekin City Hospital between October 2020 and April 2021 (53 EFT, 53 music, 53 control). In the research, EFT was applied to the pregnant women in the EFT group twice, with an interval of one week; pregnant women in the music group were listened to music twice, with a one-week interval. Pregnant women continued the attempts for one week after the first attempt. SUDS, SUE Scale, PTGI, WHO-5 WellBeing Index were used to collect data, and a saliva sample was taken.
Interventions
OTHEREmotional Freedom Technique
EFT was applied to pregnant women with a history of prenatal loss twice, one week apart, by the researcher. Between the two treatments, they were given personalized homework (on waking up in the morning and before going to sleep at night) for self-administration.
OTHERMusic
Music practice was applied to the pregnant women with a history of prenatal loss twice, one week apart, by the researcher. For one week after the first application, the music application was applied by the pregnant woman once a day/for 30 minutes, and the researcher was reminded by phone message.
Sponsors
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. Anxiety level is 1 and above when measured with the subjective discomfort unit scale (Appendix 3), 2. 18 years old and over, 3. There are no conditions such as infection, wound, scar in the tapping areas, 4. All pregnant women who did not have any health problems (such as preeclampsia, diabetes, heart disease, placenta previa, oligohydramnios, fetal anomaly) during pregnancy and baby were included in the sample.
Exclusion criteria
1. Having any problem that prevents communication (such as not knowing Turkish, having hearing, speaking and understanding abilities), 2. Contaminated salivary cortisol, 3. Those with psychiatric health problems according to their medical records were excluded from the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Determining the level of anxiety | In the first interview, SUE was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups as a pre-test at any time of pregnancy. | In order to determine the anxiety level of the pregnant women, SUE (Subjective Units of Experience) was applied. SUE is used to determine the intensity of the person's emotion at the beginning and end of therapy. The scale is scored between -10 and +10, with negative numbers for negative/unpleasant experiences and positive numbers for positive/pleasant experiences. |
| Evaluation of the level of psychological development | In the first interview, PTGI was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups as a pre-test at any time of pregnancy. | PTGI (Post Traumatic Growth Inventory) was applied to determine the psychological development level of the pregnant women. PTGI is a 21-item Likert-type scale developed to evaluate positive changes after trauma and is scored between 0 and 5. The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 0, and the highest score is 105. A high score indicates that the person has experienced a high level of growth after the traumatic experience. |
| Evaluation of the level of well-being | In the first interview, WHO-5 well-being ındex was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups as a pre-test at any time of pregnancy. | WHO-5 Well-Being Index was applied to determine the pwell-being level of the pregnant women. In order to determine mental well-being, the scale, which consists of 5 questions in total, is of 6-point Likert type, varying between never, sometimes, less than half of the time, more than half of the time and always. The raw score is calculated by adding the numbers of the five answers, and the resulting score ranges from zero to 25. Zero represents the worst possible quality of life and 25 the best possible quality of life. |
| Evaluation of the level of cortisol | At the first interview, saliva samples were taken from all pregnant women in all three groups as a pre-test at any time of pregnancy. | Saliva samples were taken from pregnant women to determine the cortisol level. Saliva sample collection materials consist of 1.5 ml saliva collection tube (ependorf tube) and sips to facilitate the salivation process. The pregnant women were informed about the procedure to be followed and the saliva collection process was explained by the researcher. For salivary cortisol analysis, 96-well microplates were covered with cortisol-BSA at +4 C overnight and blocked with 200 µl BSA (1%) at 37 °C for 2 hours. Saliva samples were thawed before adding to microplates and centrifuged at 4000g for 10 minutes. The plates were incubated for 45 minutes at 37 °C and washed 5 times with washing solution. When the blue color occurred, the plates were read by the plate-reader spectrophotometer. Calibration curves were created using 4-parameter logistic regression curves and cortisol levels were measured using this curve. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed