Skip to content

Radio Frequency Ablation Versus Stripping of Great Saphenous Vein in Management of Primary Varicose Veins , Comparative Study

Radio Frequency Ablation Versus Stripping of Great Saphenous Vein in Management of Primary Varicose Veins , Comparative Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05342779
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-04-25
Start date
2022-06-30
Completion date
2023-06-30
Last updated
2022-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Varicose Veins

Brief summary

Varicose veins are one of the most common diseases worldwide it constitutes a progressive disease which during its course it produces complications that usually prompt the patient to seek medical care. Epidemiological studies of the incidence and prevalence of varicose veins found that the majority of adults would develop it over the course of their lifetime; women were found to be four times likely as men to develop it, the incidence of varicose vein occurrence increases with age. Varicose veins are defined as tortuous dilated veins after or associated with incompetent valves.

Interventions

PROCEDUREstripping of great saphenous vein

I will make 2 or 3 small cuts in your leg. The cuts are near the top, middle, and bottom of your damaged vein. One is in your groin. The other will be farther down your leg, either in your calf or ankle. I will then thread a thin, flexible plastic wire into the vein through your groin and guide the wire through the vein toward the other cut farther down your leg. The wire is then tied to the vein and pulled out through the lower cut, which pulls the vein out with it. I will close the cuts with stitches. Patient will wear bandages and compression stockings on leg after the procedure.

Sponsors

Sohag University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion criteria: -. • Adult patients with primary non complicated varicose veins which match the criteria suitable for the procedure

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with tortuous GSV that could not allow passage of the sheath, laser fiber, non-palpable distal pulsation. * inability to ambulate, patients with previous history of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pregnant women were excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
success rateone yearTreatment success was defined as symptomatic improvement as well as decrease in vein diameter,echogenic thickening of vein wall and no flow within the occluded lumen by duplex examination Improvement of symptoms in the treated limb
complicationone year* recurrence and recanalization of the treated vein. * hyperpigmentation * recurrence and recanalization of the treated vein. * ecchymosis, paresthesia, hematoma, erythema and phlebitis.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary Contactkareem d Ahmed, resident
kareem011128@med.sohag.edu.eg01069492745
Backup Contactosama a abdalrahiem, professor

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026