Recession, Gingival
Conditions
Brief summary
To evaluate the effect of Connective Tissue Graft and Pediculated-Connective Tissue Graft for extraction socket closure on soft tissue landmarks and ridge dimensions.
Detailed description
45 subjects were randomized into two groups Experimental: Main treatment group P-CTG group Active Comparator: Control group CTG group.
Interventions
PROCEDUREP-CTG
soft tissue closure of extraction sockets was done by pediculated connective tissue grafts (P-CTG)
PROCEDURECTG
soft tissue closure of extraction sockets was done by connective tissue grafts (CTG)
Sponsors
SVS Institute of Dental Sciences
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Based on the Extraction Defect Sounding(EDS) Classification given by Caplanis et al, 1. Systemically healthy subjects within the age group of 20-50years 2. with extraction defect type 2 and type 3 were included in this study
Exclusion criteria
1. Medically compromised patients 2. Subjects who underwent radiotherapy or chemotherapy and 3. Smokers
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BL Gain | Baseline to 6 months | The displacement from the baseline to 6-months in BL dimensions was calculated and was described as BL gain. |
| Total displacement (TD) | Baseline to 6 months | The total displacement (TD) from the baseline to 6-months in MD dimensions was calculated and was described as TD gain. |
| Angle of Displacement (AOD) | Baseline to 6 months | The Angle of Displacement (AOD)) from the baseline to 6-months in MD dimensions was calculated and was described as AOD Change. |
Countries
India
Outcome results
None listed