Dentofacial Deformities
Conditions
Keywords
orthognathic surgery, virtual planning, customized titanium plates, cutting guides, CAD/CAM
Brief summary
The aim of the study is to evaluate the Skeletal stability of Le Fort I osteotomy using patient-specific osteosynthesis compared to Mini-plate fixation for patients with skeletal class III malocclusion.
Detailed description
postsurgical relapse is one of the most common observations that have been reported after fixation of Le Fort I osteotomy cases. Fixation systems with plates and screws are used in oral maxillofacial surgery for the treatment of facial fractures and orthognathic surgery cases. Although they have been used for decades and have become the standard treatment, the materials used in these systems may fail due to excess loading and other causal factors during the surgical procedure, including failure in plate adaptation and fixation to bone, material design, fabrication, and degree of purity of the plate material. In the fixation system, non-customized plates of standard size are used, and are bent to adapt them to the distances required for planning orthognathic surgeries. Therefore, mandatory use of larger plates than those programmed for use in surgeries is required so that they can be bent to enable insertion. Moreover, there are variations in the number of screws required to retain the plates to enable better fixation. The folds of non-customized plates generate stresses that are minimized when using customized plates, because these plates are fabricated individually, with predetermined sizes for each patient.
Interventions
PROCEDUREBimaxillary orthognathic surgery using conventional plates
le fort I osteotomy will carried out in the classic way guided by the classic landmarks (maxillary roots apices) as described by Wassmund. Complete separation of the maxillary segment using chisels and mallets in regular fashion. Reposition maxilla using the interocclusal wafer while mandible is gently positioned to centric relation position. Mandible is maintained in place until fixation of the maxilla with plates and screws takes place. Complete separation of the mandibular segment using chisels and mallets in regular fashion. Repositioning of mandible using the final interocclusal wafer while condylar segment is gently positioned to centric relation position. Fixation of mandibular segments with plates and/or screws in regular fashion. Incision was closed with 4-0 resorbable sutures in a continuous running fashion.
PROCEDUREBimaxillary orthognathic surgery using patient specific plates
The cutting guide of the maxilla will be placed onto the exposed bony surface and manipulated to the best fit. Then, the guide will be fixed using four 2.0-mm screws to avoid any mobilization during drilling of the reference holes. Sixteen reference holes will be established using the cutting guide; eight on each side. Then, a reciprocating saw will be used to perform the planned Le Fort I osteotomy. After adequate maxillary mobilization and removal of bony interferences, the maxilla will be repositioned using the patient-specific osteosynthesis material guided by the previously established reference holes and fixed using 2.0-mm screws. Then, the mandibular cutting guide will be fixed in the same manner and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy will be carried out. After adequate mobilization, the mandible will be repositioned by the patient-specific osteosynthesis material using the reference holes made by cutting guide and fixed using 2.0-mm screws.
Sponsors
Hassan Fahmy Hassan Alnimr
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
Due to the nature of the intervention, therapists cannot be blinded to allocation, but are strongly instructed not to disclose the allocation status to the participant at the follow up assessments. Mrs. Esraa will feed data into the computer in separate datasheets so that the assessors can analyze data without having access to information about the allocation and the procedure.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients with skeletal class III malocclusion planned for traditional Orthognathic Approach and requiring bimaxillary orthognathic surgeries in which there will be Le Fort I osteotomy with maxillary advancement ranging from 2mm to 5 mm in addition to mandibular setback. 2. Patients with no signs or symptoms of active TMDs. 3. Highly motivated patients.
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients who refused to be included in the research. 2. Patients with systemic diseases that may hinder the normal healing process or render the patient not fitting for general anaesthesia. 3. Patients with intra-bony lesions or infections that may retard the osteotomy healing.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Skeletal relapse of Le Fort I osteotomy | Linear deviations between immediate postoperative and 12 months postoperative position | Skeletal relapse will be assessed through measuring Linear deviations (DT) between the immediate postoperative (T1) and the 12 months postoperative position (T2) in Mimics 19.0 software using hard tissue reference points (A point, Anterior nasal spine, posterior nasal spine, Incisive foramen, Right side Greater palatine foramen, Left side Greater palatine foramen) in relation to three reference planes (Frankfort horizontal plane (FHP), coronal plane, and mid-facial plane (MFP)). Measurements from the reference points to the FHP indicated vertical deviation, to the coronal plane indicated anteroposterior deviation, and to the MFP indicated mediolateral deviation. measurements will be in millimeters. |
Countries
Egypt
Contacts
Primary ContactHassan Alnimr
Outcome results
None listed