Effect of Implant Driver Facilitated Micro-osteo Perforation on the Rate of Tooth Movement.

Effect of Implant Driver Facilitated Micro-osteo Perforations on the Rate of Tooth Movement.

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT05339620

Enrollment

Registered

2022-04-21

Start date

2018-01-07

Completion date

2022-03-20

Last updated

2022-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth Movement Techniques

Keywords

micro-osteoperforations, tooth movement, implant driver

Brief summary

we have conducted a split-mouth randomized clinical trial to study effects of implant induced micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction.

Detailed description

The experimental group will receive implant driver facilitated microosteoperforation on one side of the mouth( according to split mouth design) decided by random allocation. After 3 months of extraction of upper first premolar ( according to planned orthodontic treatment), 3 microosteoperforation will be done with implant in an implant driver distal to canine. Surgical procedure will be done in local anesthesia, no flap will be raised. Alginate impressions will be taken before the procedure and 28 days after canine retraction has started, to measure the difference between rate of canine retraction on both sides. Measurement was done by a digital vernier caliper,

Interventions

PROCEDUREimplant driver facilitated micro-osteoperforations

3 micro-osteoperforations(in a vertical pattern) are done on the randomly allocated experimental side , distal to canine under local anesthesia. the other side of the mouth is used as a control. alginate impression is taken before the intervention .

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

double blind

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 45 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* • Male and female * Age 18- 45 years * Class 2 div 1 * No systemic disease * No radiographic evidence of bone loss * No history of periodontal therapy * No current active periodontal disease * No smoking * No gingivitis or untreated caries * Probing depth \< 4mm in all teeth * Gingival index \< 1mm * Plaque index \< 1mm

Exclusion criteria

* Long term use of antibiotics, phenytoin,cyclosporine, anti inflammatory drugs, systemic corticosteroids and calcium channel blockers. * Poor oral hygiene for more than 2 visits. * Extreme skeletal class 2 malocclusion, overjet \> 10mm, anb\> 7 * Systemic disease * Evidence of bone loss * Past periodontal disease * Current periodontal disease * Smoking * Gingivitis and caries * Probing depth \> 4mm

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Comparing rate of canine retraction between intervention and non-intervention side.	28 days	distance from cusp tip of canine to mesio-buccal cusp tip of molar taken by digital vernier caliper.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026