Skip to content

Balance Performance in Dual Task in Patients With Cervical Disc Herniation Related Chronic Neck Pain:a Comparative Study

Balance Performance in Dual Task in Patients With Cervical Disc Herniation Related Chronic Neck Pain: a Comparative Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05338788
Enrollment
55
Registered
2022-04-21
Start date
2019-05-20
Completion date
2022-03-20
Last updated
2022-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Pain, Postural Balance

Keywords

Cervical Pain, postural balance, Biodex Balance System, Cervical disc herniation

Brief summary

Intense pain and moderate disability are seen most patients with symptomatic cervical disc herniation (CDH). Since neck motion and motor control are associated with changes in neck pain and disability, it is highly likely that patients with neck pain related disability would display dual-task interference (DTI) during postural control with a cognitive task. It is very important for patients with cervical disk herniation to perform more than one task at the same time for many activities of daily living. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare balance performance in dual task between patients with CDH related chronic neck pain and asymptomatic controls.

Detailed description

This study was designed cross-sectional controlled study. Thirty-two patients with CDH related chronic neck pain and twenty-three age and sex-matched asymptomatic controls participated in this study. The Neck Disability Index (NDI) was used to assess neck pain related disability. The Biodex Balance System (BBS; Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, New York, USA) was used to assess postural control. This system allows individuals to measure their stability limits. It also examines the control of the center of gravity on the support surface and balance abilities when trying to move it. The evaluated parameters of this system are presented below; modified clinical test of sensory integration of balance (mCTSIB), athletic single leg test (ASLT), limits of stability (LOS), and fall risk assessment were performed with and without a cognitive task. Dual-task interference (DTI) was assessed. In order to avoid the order bias of postural control measurements during Single-task and Dual-task for each case, the order of the measurements was determined by randomization on the first day by using sealed envelope method. After single/double task randomization was made, the order of tests was also randomized by using sealed envelopes containing two different orders (1-mCTSIB, 2-ASLT, 3-Fall test, 4-LOS and 1- LOS, 2- Fall test, 3- ASLT, 4-mCTSIB). Before starting the evaluations, the participants were informed about the tests. Considering methodological bias, the same investigator performed all assessments and all participants received standardized and identical instructions. Single and dual task measurements were made as follows: Single task measurements involved the measurement of balance parameters by using Biodex Balance System without any additional cognitive task. For assessment of dual task performance, the participants were asked to perform an additional cognitive task (counting backwards from 200 by three or seven) during measurements . DTI values were calculated for all balance parameters using the formulas below : DTI %= (Dual Task-Single Task)/Single Task\*100

Interventions

OTHERneck pain and dual task

The Neck Disability Index (NDI) was used to assess neck pain related disability. The Biodex Balance System was used to assess postural control.Clinical test of sensory integration of balance (mCTSIB), athletic single leg test (ASLT), limits of stability (LOS), and fall risk assessment were performed with and without a cognitive task.In order to avoid the order bias of postural control measurements during Single-task and Dual-task for each case, the order of the measurements was determined by randomization on the first day by using sealed envelope method. After single/double task randomization was made, the order of tests was also randomized by using sealed envelopes containing two different orders (1-mCTSIB, 2-ASLT, 3-Fall test, 4-LOS and 1- LOS, 2- Fall test, 3- ASLT, 4-mCTSIB).

Sponsors

Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1.18 to 64 years of age 2.Having generalized neck pain for more than 3 months 3.Being literate and cooperative 4.Being volunteer 5.Volunteer patients diagnosed with chronic neck pain by a specialist Inclusion criteria in the control group; 1. Asymptomatic individuals between the ages of 18-64 2. Without any known disease diagnosis and health problems that would affect the evaluations

Exclusion criteria

1. Being pregnant, 2. Malignancy, 3. Having cervical stenosis, 4. Severe cervical spondylosis, 5. Cervical fractures and tumor, 6. Osteoporosis, 7. Neurologic deficit related to compression of the spinal root or cord, 8. Having neurologic, dermatologic, infectious, inflammatory rheumatologic and endocrine diseases, 9. Any problems that will hinder exercise (advanced cardiopulmonary or orthopedic problems), having intervention including exercise program or physiotherapy in the three months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
BalanceBaselineThe Biodex Balance System (BBS; Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, New York, USA) was used to assess postural control.The evaluated parameters of this system are presented below:The modified clinical test of sensory integration of balance (mCTSIB), athletic single leg test (ASLT), limits of stability (LOS), and fall risk assessment were performed with and without a cognitive task.
The modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration of Balance (mCTSIB)BaselineThe mCTSIB was used to assess individuals capability to use sensory inputs for balance.
Athletic Single Leg Test (ASLT)BaselineThe evaluation was made with eyes open and closed on one leg (dominant limb) on a firm floor on the balance device platform
Limits of Stability (LOS):BaselineThis test is the best test that measures dynamic control among the standard sway tests.
Fall risk assessmentBaselineThe pre-test platform level was adjusted so that the starting position was 12 and the ending position was 8

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disability levelBaselineThe disability level will be measured with the Turkish version of Neck Disability Index (NDI). It consists of 10 sections which include the severity of pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headache, concentration, work-life, driving, sleeping and leisure activities. There are 6 responses for each section, scored 0 (no pain and no functional limitation) and 5 (worst pain and maximum limitation). The total score ranges from 0 to 50.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026