Skip to content

Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns Versus Conventional Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns in Posterior Teeth (1y Randomized Clinical Trial).

Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns Versus Conventional Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns in Posterior Teeth (1y Randomized Clinical Trial).

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05337358
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-04-20
Start date
2021-04-01
Completion date
2023-04-11
Last updated
2022-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clinical Performance

Keywords

Lithium dislocate, fiber reinforced composite

Brief summary

In patients with endodontically treated molar teeth indicated for endocrown, will the fiber reinforced FRC base and bonded CAD/CAM resin composite endocrowns restorations have a similar clinical performance to the conventional lithium disilicate endocrown over one year?

Interventions

PROCEDUREendocrown

endocrown

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with good oral hygiene * Patients having one or more endodontically treated molars that need prosthetic restoration. * Molars should have enough tooth structure for endocrown restoration with minimum 3 walls with thickness not less than 1.5 mm and gingival step placed supragingival * Fully erupted molars * Molars free of developmental defect * Healthy periodontium * Absence of periapical pathosis * Acceptable endodontic treatment and proper bone support

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with bad oral hygiene * Patients with active periodontal disease * Patients with missing teeth opposing to the area intended for restoration * Patients with parafunctional habits or psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
clinical performance2 yearsUsing the modified United States Public Health Service criteria (Modified USPHS)- categorical

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactSameh Sh Abou-steit, PhD
samehabousteit@hotmail.com01001891010

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026