Skip to content

OA for Breast Cancer NAC Response

Feasibility of Assessing Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Therapy Response Using Imagio Opto-Acoustic Imaging

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05337280
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-04-20
Start date
2021-03-30
Completion date
2023-01-04
Last updated
2023-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

This is an early research and development study. The objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of the Imagio OA/US Breast Imaging System to detect complete breast cancer pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy as assessed by functional optoacoustic features, vascular features and relative degrees of oxygenation/deoxygenation

Detailed description

The use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in the treatment of breast cancer patients is increasing beyond the scope of locally advanced disease. Imaging provides important information in assessing response to therapy as a complement to conventional tumor measurements via physical examination. Tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy can also provide prognostic information. As stated in the background section, the attainment of pCR after completion of neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection is associated with improved disease-free survival \[1-3\]. This correlation is especially strong for Triple-receptor negative (ER, PR negative and HER-2 non amplified), and HER-2 positive breast cancer. Studies of neoadjuvant therapy have used a variety of methods for assessing tumor response. Currently, there are no established clinical practice guidelines for how best to assess tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy. Typically, patients undergo conventional breast imaging (mammography and US) and physical examination, and DCE-MRI in selected cases. The Imagio OA/US technology is an alternative imaging technology that demonstrates both gray scale ultrasound morphologic information, including size measurements, and functional information that includes presence or absence of tumor angiogenesis, degree of angiogenesis, and relative degrees of oxygenation and deoxygenation of hemoglobin.

Interventions

Imagio optoacoustic/ultrasound

Sponsors

American College of Radiology
CollaboratorOTHER
Seno Medical Instruments Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a single center sequential design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18 years and older male or female patients; 2. Ipsilateral intact biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer clinical T1-T4 (by standard of care imaging), including primary or recurrent disease. 3. Patient eligible to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Exclusion criteria

1. Known Stage IV disease (breast or other cancer); 2. Have a condition or impediment (i.e., insect bites, poison ivy, open sores, chafing of the skin, scar, tattoos, moles, etc.); that could interfere with the intended field of view (within one probe length or 4 cm of the nodule); 3. Patient has received chemotherapy for any type of cancer within 90 days from date of baseline Imagio OA/US exam; 4. Is experiencing photo-toxicity associated with currently taking, or having taken, photosensitizing agents within the previous 72 hours such as sulfa, ampicillin, tetracycline; 5. Is currently undergoing phototherapy; 6. Has a history of any photosensitive disease (e.g., porphyria, lupus erythematosus); 7. Is undergoing treatment for a photosensitive disease and is experiencing photosensitivity; 8. Pregnancy; 9. Patient has participated in a clinical study of an investigational drug or device within 3 months prior to screening visit that may have an impact on clinical outcomes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The number of masses that may exhibit qualitative changes in accordance with Functional Feature Scale as assessed by Imagio OA/US over the course of baseline though follow-up timepointsBaseline to Post Surgical Assessment at 6 monthsFeature scores per mass derived per Feature Score Scale (0-6 and 0-5 scoring- lower score mean most likely benign) per 5 mass features (External Peripheral Zone, External Capsular Boundary, Internal Shape, Internal Echotexture, Internal Sound ) used to predict number of masses that demonstrated response or no response at all time points (baseline, cycle 2, mid cycle and pre surgical) to chemotherapy treatment
Number of masses that correlate with chemotherapy response/no response as assessed by Functional Feature Score Scale at all study timepoints to predict optimal timing for Imagio imagingBaseline to Post Surgical Assessment at 6 monthsNumber of masses assessed at baseline and follow-up timepoints - cycle 2, mid cycle and pre surgical f/u that correlate with feature score (External Peripheral Zone, External Capsular, Internal Vessel Score, Internal Total Hemoglobin, Internal Deoxygenated Blush) changes assessed by Feature Score Scale (0-6 nd 0-5 scores depending on feature) and pathologic complete response (pCR) to determine optimal timing for imaging.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of metastatic lymph nodes scored using a Lymph Node Scoring Scale that may correlate with chemotherapy responseBaseline to Post Surgical Assessment at 6 monthsImagio OA/US imaging of metastatic lymph nodes will be assessed using a designated Lymph Node Scale (Shape Score, Cortical Thickness, Margin Score and Hilar Compression Score, Size Score) to predict response(0 = benign / 1 = benign, uncertain / 2-4 = probably malignant / \>=5 = malignant) to chemotherapy

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026