Skip to content

Secondary Intervention and Surveillance After EVAR

Secondary Intervention and Surveillance After Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Endovascular Repair: Retrospective Cohort Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05335642
Enrollment
214
Registered
2022-04-19
Start date
2021-06-01
Completion date
2021-09-30
Last updated
2022-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Without Rupture

Brief summary

This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients submitted to elective EVAR, between February/2009 and May/2019 in a single institution. Symptomatic or ruptured AAA, mycotic aneurysms, isolated iliac aneurysms and complex abdominal aortic repairs were excluded. The primary outcomes were freedom from secondary intervention and compliance with follow-up, defined as surveillance imaging performed within a periodicity no longer than 18 months.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEVAR

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Sponsors

Hospital Sao Joao
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients submitted to elective EVAR, between February/2009 and May/2019 in a single institution.

Exclusion criteria

* Symptomatic or ruptured AAA, mycotic aneurysms, isolated iliac aneurysms and complex abdominal aortic repairs were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participant with secondary intervention (SI) after EVAR5 years follow upSI included: access-related SI included suture of access bleeds, distal thrombo-embolectomy, patch angioplasty, or thromboendarterectomy of the common femoral artery; limb graft occlusion was defined as a thrombotic obstruction of blood flow in one or both endograft limbs, being a potential threat to the limb; lower limb ischemia was considered when there was a decrease in arterial perfusion of the limb, that was not related with limb graft occlusion; endoleak; stent migration was reported if no simultaneous type 1 endoleak was observed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participant with compliance with follow-up after EVAR5 years follow upNon-compliance with surveillance was defined by an 18 months period in which no surveillance imaging was performed.

Countries

Portugal

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026