Skip to content

A Patient-Centered Communication Tool (UR-GOAL) Versus Usual Care for Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Their Caregivers, and Their Oncologists

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Patient-centered Communication Tool (UR-GOAL) for Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Their Caregivers, and Their Oncologists

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05335369
Acronym
UR-GOAL 2
Enrollment
161
Registered
2022-04-19
Start date
2022-06-17
Completion date
2025-10-06
Last updated
2026-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Keywords

Acute myeloid leukemia, communication, shared decision making, older adults, geriatric hematology

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the preliminary efficacy of the UR-GOAL tool in improving shared decision making and communication between older patients with AML and their oncologists in a pilot randomized trial.

Detailed description

The investigators have developed a patient-centered communication tool (University of Rochester-Geriatric Oncology assessment for Acute myeloid Leukemia or UR-GOAL) that 1) conducts assessments of fitness, 2) elicits patient values via Best-Worst Scaling, and 3) elicits preferences for prognostic information and assesses prognostic awareness. The tool also includes an AML educational video. The investigators have refined the tool based on feedback from stakeholders consisting of older patients with cancer, caregivers, and oncologists. This was further adapted in a qualitative study of 15 older patients with AML. In a single arm pilot study, the investigators have demonstrated feasibility of recruiting older patients with newly diagnosed AML to a single arm study, as well as their caregivers and oncologists.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALUR-GOAL

UR-GOAL helps conducts assessments of fitness, elicits patient values via Best-Worst Scaling, and elicits preferences for prognostic information and assesses prognostic awareness. The tool also includes an AML educational video.

Sponsors

University of Rochester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The UR-GOAL 1) conducts assessments of fitness, 2) elicits patient values via Best-Worst Scaling, and 3) elicits preferences for prognostic information and assesses prognostic awareness. The tool also includes an AML educational video.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients 1. Age ≥60 years 2. Newly diagnosed AML or being worked up for possible AML 3. Able to provide informed consent 4. Agreement of their oncologist to participate in the study 5. English-speaking If patients screen positive for cognitive impairment on the Mini-Cog test performed as part of the baseline assessment, they can still enroll if they are able to provide informed consent and have decision making capacity as determined by their treating oncologist Caregivers 1. Selected by the patient when asked if there is a "family member, partner, friend or caregiver \[age 21 or older\] with whom the patient discuss or who can be helpful in health-related matters;" patients who cannot identify such a person ("caregiver") can be eligible for the study. A caregiver need not be someone who lives with the patient or provides direct hands-on care. A caregiver can be any person who provides support (in any way) to the patient 2. Able to provide informed consent 3. English-speaking Oncologists 1. A practicing oncologist 2. At least one of their patients are recruited to the study 3. English-speaking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shared Decision MakingWithin 1-4 weeks after treatment initiationA 9-item Shared Decision Making questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) assessing patient satisfaction with the medical decision-making process. Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale in accordance with measure guidelines, with higher scores indicating greater shared decision making between the patient and the provider.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care (PCC-Ca-36)Within 1-4 weeks after treatment initiationA 36-item questionnaire assessing patient-centered communication in six domains: exchanging information, making decisions, fostering healing relationships, enabling patient self-management, managing uncertainty, and responding to emotions. The overall score and scores in each domain range from 1-5, higher scores indicate better communication.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKah Poh Loh

University of Rochester

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients aged 60 and above with AML were recruited from June 2022 to July 2025. Patients were recruited from 1) the Wilmot Cancer Institute inpatient malignant hematology service and 2) hematology clinics at Wilmot Cancer Institute. Enrolled patients could enroll with a caregiver, but were not required to. Oncologists at the Wilmot Cancer Institute were eligible if they treated at least one enrolled patient.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous73.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
ECOG (KPS)
0 (90-100)
10 Participants
ECOG (KPS)
1 (70-80)
47 Participants
ECOG (KPS)
2 (50-60)
21 Participants
ECOG (KPS)
3 (30-40)
6 Participants
Education
College or Post-Graduate
19 Participants
Education
High School or Below
0 Participants
Education
Some College/University
14 Participants
Employment
Employed
0 Participants
Employment
Other
0 Participants
Employment
Retired, Unemployed, Homemaker
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
149 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
GDS-15
Impaired
11 Participants
GDS-15
Missing
1 Participants
GDS-15
Not Impaired
0 Participants
Marital Status
Divorced, Single, or Widowed
48 Participants
Marital Status
Married or Long-term partner
105 Participants
Mini-Cog
Impaired
4 Participants
Mini-Cog
Missing
3 Participants
Mini-Cog
Not Impaired
84 Participants
Nutrition
Impaired
0 Participants
Nutrition
Not Impaired
42 Participants
Physical Function
Impaired
37 Participants
Physical Function
Missing
3 Participants
Physical Function
Not Impaired
12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
151 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
33 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
12 / 5010 / 500 / 250 / 280 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 500 / 500 / 250 / 280 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 500 / 500 / 250 / 280 / 8

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 13, 2026