COVID-19
Conditions
Keywords
Covid, Covid 19, Virus
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of the Bio-Self COVID-19 Antigen Home Test. The study will evaluate the accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) in a simulated home use environment when compared to a high-sensitivity Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay.
Detailed description
The Bio-Self COVID-19 Antigen Home Test is immunochromatographic and uses double-antibody sandwich method to detect SARS-CoV-2 antigen from individuals with or without symptoms or other epidemiological reasons to suspect a COVID-19 infection. The test is intended for non-prescription home use with self-collected direct anterior nares swab samples from individuals ages 14 years and older or adult collected anterior nares swab samples from individuals ages 2 to 13. The primary objective of this study is to determine the accuracy of the Bio-Self COVID-19 Antigen Home Test when compared to a high-sensitivity Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay.
Interventions
At home COVID-19 antigen test kit
Standard of care
High Sensitivity RT-PCR COVID-19 Test
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
This is an open label, prospective study to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Bio-Self COVID-19 Antigen Home Test when a lay person conducts the test on themselves or another study participant. Potential subjects will be those presenting for COVID-19 testing. The study will evaluate the performance of the Bio-Self COVID-19 Antigen Home Test by comparing it to a high sensitivity EUA SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay to calculate both the positive percent agreement \[(PPA) sensitivity\] and negative percent agreement \[(NPA) specificity\].
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. An Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved informed consent and assent, if applicable, is signed and dated prior to any study-related activities. 2. Male and female Subjects 2 years of age and older. 3. Subject is willing to provide a self-collected nasal swab sample. (If under the age of 14, the sample will be collected by an adult.) 4. Subject is willing to have a nasal swab collected by a healthcare professional. 5. Subject agrees to complete all aspects of the study.
Exclusion criteria
1. Subject has a visual impairment that cannot be restored with glasses or contact lenses. 2. Subject has prior medical or laboratory training. 3. Subject had a positive COVID-19 test in past three (3) months. 4. Subject uses home diagnostics, e.g., HIV Tests, glucose meters, etc.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Positive Percent Agreement - Sensitivity | 48 hours | The sensitivity is computed as the proportion of positive samples as called by the EUA SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay, which are also positive as called by the Bio-Self COVID-19 Antigen Home Test. |
| Negative Percent Agreement - Specificity | 48 hours | The specificity is computed as the proportion of negative samples as called by the EUA SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay, which are also negative as called by the Bio-Self COVID-19 Antigen Home Test. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Date of First Enrollment: 12 May 2022 Date of Last Completed: 25 July 2022 The first 50 subjects presenting to the sites for COVID-19 testing were consecutively enrolled (i.e., all comers) including those who were either asymptomatic or symptomatic for COVID-19. Following this enrollment, only subjects who were symptomatic for COVID-19 were enrolled until 30 RT-PCR confirmed positive samples were collected. Then enrollment resumed for all comers.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Performance Data Set In the initial PEUA, the Agency confirmed that the EUA authorized high-sensitivity PerkinElmer New Coronavirus Nucleic Acid Detection Kit was an acceptable RT-PCR comparator for this study. In a follow-up email to the Agency on 18 July 2022, BioTeke asked if the chosen PerkinElmer RT-PCR kit could be utilized with a separately authorized extraction method (i.e., ThermoFisher KingFisher), which had been internally validated by the CLIA laboratory but was not included in the PerkinElmer's Instructions for Use. Of note, the initial subject samples had been tested using this extraction kit. The FDA responded that this would not be an acceptable approach, as the comparator method had to use the authorized extraction method outlined in the manufacturer's authorized instructions. In response to the Agency's decision, the central CLIA testing laboratory, DevLab Bio, internally validated the extraction method using the Chemagic 360 as specified in the PerkinElmer instructions. The intent was to re-test those samples previously tested using the ThermoFisher extraction method and test all future samples using only this authorized process.
When preparing to re-test the initial subject samples, it was found that a number of samples had been discarded in error. These samples were not included in the performance analysis.
Performance analysis was based on 253 subjects rather than the 282 enrolled. | 253 |
| Total | 253 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Performance Data Set |
|---|---|
| Age, Customized Age 14 - 24 years | 24 Participants |
| Age, Customized Age < 14 years | 27 Participants |
| Age, Customized Age 25 - 64 years | 108 Participants |
| Age, Customized Age ≥ 65 years | 94 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 132 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 121 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 6 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 22 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 222 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 253 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 148 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 105 Participants |
| Symptomatic | 155 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 30 | 0 / 252 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 30 | 0 / 252 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 30 | 0 / 252 |
Outcome results
Negative Percent Agreement - Specificity
The specificity is computed as the proportion of negative samples as called by the EUA SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay, which are also negative as called by the Bio-Self COVID-19 Antigen Home Test.
Time frame: 48 hours
Population: Specificity for symptomatic subjects
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Data Set | Negative Percent Agreement - Specificity | 100 percent probability |
Positive Percent Agreement - Sensitivity
The sensitivity is computed as the proportion of positive samples as called by the EUA SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay, which are also positive as called by the Bio-Self COVID-19 Antigen Home Test.
Time frame: 48 hours
Population: Symptomatic Subjects
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Data Set | Positive Percent Agreement - Sensitivity | 96.2 percent probability |