Skip to content

Effectiveness of Home Based Early Intervention of Extremely Premature Infant by Parent

Effectiveness of Home Based Early Intervention of Extremely Premature Infant by Parent

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05334550
Enrollment
110
Registered
2022-04-19
Start date
2022-06-02
Completion date
2024-03-02
Last updated
2022-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Developmental Delay, Early Intervention, Extreme Prematurity, Home Exercise, Motor Outcome, Parents, Preterm

Brief summary

This study is to prove the effectiveness of home based early intervention of extremely premature infant by Parent.

Detailed description

The perpose of this study to prove the significance of the hypothesis that there will be a significant improvement in motor development when remote tele-rehabilitation treatment is performed for extremely premature infants. The investigators plan to recruit subjects who meet the inclusion criteria and do not meet the exclusion criteria from among extremely premature infants born at Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Korea, whose gestational age is from 23 weeks to 28 weeks. The target number of n is 110, 55 per group. After randomization into an intervention group and a control group, the intervention group get the intervention starting at 0 months of correctional age and runs for 3 months. In both groups, motor outcomes are measured at the time of enrollment, at 3 months of correction age, 6 months of correction age and 12 months of correction age

Interventions

OTHERHome Based Early Intervention by Parent

Through a video communication program called ZOOM, the parents of intervention group are educated once every two weeks for three months. Parent education consists of a program developed by our pediatric rehabilitation therapist to help premature infants develop motor skills. Parents provide daily exercise training to their children as educated.

Sponsors

Samsung Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Extreme premature baby (gestationl age 23\ 28 weeks) * Corrected age under one month at the time of enroll of this study * Children of those who voluntarily decided to participate after hearing detailed explanations about this study and gave their written consent. * Children whose parents are Korean

Exclusion criteria

* Congenital anomalies in the central nervous system * Hereditary diseases * Chromosomal abnormalities (Down syndrome, etc.) * Stage 3 or more intraventricular hemorrhage * If surgery was performed for hydrocephalus * Leukomalacia confirmed by ultrasound examination (not applicable to increase in white matter shading) * Neonatal asphyxia * Other central nervous system diseases * If taking medications for convulsions or epilepsy * Metabolic disease * In the case of premature infants undergoing surgery for retinal disease * Hearing loss * In case of surgery due to complex congenital anomaly or planned operation (not excluded if surgery is not required) * In case of oxygen dependence due to lung disease in premature infants * Musculoskeletal disorders (hip dislocation, polyarthrosis, etc.) * Neuromuscular disease, etc. * Those whose family has social problems * Those whose parents cannot participate in this study * Those who have other serious complications that cannot proceed with the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline Test of infant motor performance at 3 monthsaround the start of intervention(up to 1 week), 3 months after the start of intervetionThe Test of infant motor performance (TIMP) is conducted on infants under 4 months of age to perform functions in daily life. It is performed to evaluate the selective control of postures and movements that infants need in daily life, and takes an average of 25-35 minutes. The TIMP was developed to 1) identify infants with delayed motor development, 2) differentiate between infants with varying degrees of risk for measurement outcomes, and 3) measure changes due to interventions. Because it can be used in both early intervention programs, it can aid in communication between parents and health care providers in a variety of settings. The range of test score is from 0 to 142. The higher score means the better motor performance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline Edinburgh postnatal depression scale at 3 monthsaround the start of intervention(up to 1 week), 3 months after the start of intervetionEdinburgh postnatal depression scale is a 10-item scale for screening for maternal depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3; the higher score indicates the possibility of depressed status. Total score is from 0 to 30. A score of 13 or higher indicates a possible postpartum depression. It has been validated by several studies confirming that EPDS is a reliable and sensitive indicator of depression.
Alberta infant motor scale6 months and 12 months after the start of intervetionAlberta infant motor scale is a validated and reliable observational tool for use in infants from full term to 18 months of age. Alberta infant motor scale can evaluate the qualitative aspects of movement and sensitively measure the change in infant's motor performance. Assessment of Alberta infant motor scale is scored based on the number of gross motor postures and movements the infant has demonstrated while prone, supine, and sitting or standing. The range of scores of each item are as followed; prone is from 0 to 21, supine is from 0 to 9, sitting is from 0 to 12, standing is from 0 to 16. The range of total score is from 0 to 58. The higher score means the better motor performance. The evaluation score can be converted to a percentile rank that can be compared with the percentile rank of a standard age-matched infant sample.
Peabody Developmental Motor Scales 2nd edition12 months after the start of intervetionPeabody Developmental Motor Scales 2nd edition evaluates both fine motor and macromotor function. It can be evaluated from newborn to 5 years old. It consists of six subtests: reflex, stationary, locomotion, object manipulation, grasping, and visual motor integration. Range of score of each items are as followed; reflex is from 0 to 16, stationary is from 0 to 60, locomotion is from 0 to 198, objective manipulation is from 0 to 48, grasping is from 0 to 26, visual-motor integration is from 0 to 72. The summation of scores is converted into age-matched percentile that can be ranked. The higher scores is matched to better ranked percentile. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales 2nd edition is a test whose reliability and validity have been verified in various conditions such as autism, cerebral palsy, and premature infants.

Contacts

Primary ContactLee Jinuk, resident
jinuk8780.lee@samsung.com+8210-4555-3349
Backup ContactKwon Jeong-Yi, PhD
jeongyi.kwon@samsung.com+82-2-3410-2818

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026