Skip to content

Angio-seal VIP Versus Perclose ProGlide for Closure of the Femoral Artery in Peripheral Vascular Disease

Angio-seal VIP Versus Perclose ProGlide for Closure of the Femoral Artery in Peripheral Vascular Disease: a Prospective Single-center Randomized Non-inferiority Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05334095
Enrollment
1062
Registered
2022-04-19
Start date
2019-08-20
Completion date
2022-09-01
Last updated
2022-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Percutaneous Intervention Via Femoral Artery, Peripheral Vascular Diseases

Keywords

Peripheral Vascular Diseases, closure device, Femoral Artery

Brief summary

This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy (device deployment characteristics and performance) and safety (adverse access site related events) of Perclose ProGlide (Abbott Vascular Devices) for femoral access site closure in patients undergoing peripheral vascular diagnostic and interventional procedures in comparison with Angio-seal VIP (St. Jude Medical).

Detailed description

Prospective, single-center, randomized (1:1), open-label, non-inferiority study in 1062 patients comparing Perclose ProGlide (test device) to the Angio-seal VIP (standard comparator).

Interventions

After peripheral vascular diagnostic and interventional procedures, patients are randomized to receive Perclose ProGlide.

After peripheral vascular diagnostic and interventional procedures, patients are randomized to receive Angio-seal VIP

Sponsors

Xiongjing Jiang
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient is ≥18 and \< 85 years of age. * Patient is willing to provide written informed consent prior to study device use. * Patient is undergoing a peripheral vascular diagnostic and/or interventional procedure via femoral arterial access. * Patients' arterial puncture site is in the common femoral artery confirmed by a femoral angiogram, and ≥10mm away from the ostium of the inferior epigastric artery (IEA) and the bifurcation of superficial femoral artery and the profunda femoris artery.

Exclusion criteria

* The femoral access site has been punctured within 30 days, or deployed with a collagen-based hemostasis device within 90 days, or a suture-mediated closure device. * Patients having a hematoma, pseudoaneurysm or arteriovenous fistula present prior to sheath removal confirmed by a femoral angiogram. * Patients with minimum femoral artery calcium which is fluoroscopically visible at access site or femoral artery diameter stenosis greater than 50%. * Ankle-brachial index (ABI) of the ipsilateral limb of access site cannot be measured due to severe peripheral artery disease (PAD). * Patients who are pregnant or lactating.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of the device successfully deployed and absence of the major vascular complications necessitating aggressive treatments (surgical or percutaneous repair etc.) at 30 days30 days post procedureDeployment procedure success is defined as haemostasis after the delivery and release of a closure device, manual compression is no longer needed or less than 5 minutes, and no more closure devices are needed. Major vascular complications include: 1. Vascular injury related to access site requiring surgical or percutaneous intervention, or ultrasound guided compression, or thrombin injection. 2. New onset lower extremity ischemia attributed to arterial access or closure, and/or the ABI of the ipsilateral limb of access site decreased by ≥0.15 or requiring surgical or additional percutaneous intervention. 3. haemorrhage related to access site requiring transfusion, or haemoglobin decreased by ≥5g/dl or hematocrit (HCT) decreased by ≥15% 4. Infection requiring a hospitalization extended for more than 24 hours or a new hospitalization or treatment with intravenous antibiotics. 5. Nerve injury related to access site which is permanent or requires surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Minor ipsilateral access site complications at 30 days and generally no aggressive treatment is required30 days post procedureMinor ipsilateral access site vascular complications included: 1. Access site pseudoaneurysm or AV fistula documented by ultrasound, neither surgical nor percutaneous intervention is required. 2. Post-discharge access site-related haemorrhage requiring ≥ 30 minutes manual compression to re-achieve hemostasis. 3. Lower extremity arterial stenosis attributed to arterial access or closure, whereas neither surgical nor percutaneous intervention is required. 4. haemorrhage related to access site with no transfusion required. while, transfusion is required when haemoglobin decreased by \<5g/dl or hematocrit (HCT) decreased by \<15%. 5. Access site hematoma ≥ 6 cm, neither blood transfusion nor surgical intervention is required. 6. Localized access site infection treated with intramuscular or oral antibiotics. 7. Transient access site-related nerve injury.
Incidence at 180 days of the composite endpoint of major vascular complications necessitating aggressive treatments (surgical or percutaneous repair etc.)180 days post procedureMajor vascular complications include: 1. Vascular injuries related to access site requiring surgical or percutaneous intervention, or ultrasound guided compression, or thrombin injection. 2. New onset lower extremity ischemia that is attributed to arterial access or closure, and the ABI of the ipsilateral limb of access site decreased by ≥0.15 or requiring surgical or additional percutaneous intervention. 3. Bleeding related to access site requiring transfusion or haemoglobin decreased by ≥5g/dl or hematocrit (HCT) decreased by ≥15% 4. Infection requiring a extended hospitalization for more than 24 hours or a new hospitalization or treatment with intravenous antibiotics. 5. Nerve injury related to access site is permanent or requires surgery.
Deployment procedure timewithin 24 hours of device deploymentDeployment procedure time was defined as elapsed time from the first skin break to final closure (skin to skin time)
Time to haemostasis from removing the sheath until haemostasiswithin 24 hours of device deploymentHaemostasis is considered as insignificant bleeding on the bandage or small continuous oozing, manual compression is no longer needed or less than 5 minutes.
Patients' comfort level during the deployment of the closure device using the visual analog scale (VAS)within 5 minutes of device deployment0 cm means no pain, while 10 cm means the worst imaginable pain or the worst pain one had experienced

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXiongjing Jiang, MD
jxj103@hotmail.com+861088322385

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026