Skip to content

Assessing Malleability of Spatial Abilities in Down Syndrome

Assessing the Malleability of Spatial Abilities in Individuals With Down Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05332912
Enrollment
84
Registered
2022-04-18
Start date
2021-04-01
Completion date
2025-03-31
Last updated
2025-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Down Syndrome

Brief summary

Based on available literature and our own preliminary research, the researchers have concluded that persons with Down syndrome (DS) exhibit difficulties in utilizing the specific spatial abilities of mental rotation and perspective taking and performing complex spatial tasks such as wayfinding and environmental learning. A weakness in spatial abilities may have many direct applications to daily life, ranging from activities such as tying shoes to using hand tools and navigating the environment. Spatial abilities also serve as a cognitive foundation for many other complex skills such as solving mathematical problems and using spatial language for giving and receiving directions. Moreover, spatial abilities are used in a variety of specialty jobs such as grocery stocking, packaging, and assembling, which are among the most commonly reported jobs for adults with DS. Hence, a new focus on spatial ability and its modifiability in persons with DS is clearly warranted. The primary goal of the research proposed in this application is to evaluate the malleability of mental rotation and perspective taking in people with DS through providing intentional experience with numerous spatial activities. Two groups of participants will be tested over the course of the project: adolescents and young adults with DS and typically developing (TD) children. Following an initial evaluation of performance on the two abilities, participants will receive up to eight sessions of spatial activity experience utilizing puzzle construction, block building, and computer search tasks. Following the experience sessions, spatial abilities of participants will be re-evaluated. These data will be used to investigate two specific aims. First, the researchers investigate whether spatial abilities of persons with DS can be modified by experience with spatial activities. Second, the researchers investigate whether the degree of modification observed for persons with DS can reduce performance differences between them and TD children. The researchers also consider whether performance on the PPVT, Raven's matrices, and Chronological Age are associated with any benefits from spatial ability experience.

Detailed description

Participants will take part in a study designed to facilitate the development of two spatial abilities: Mental Rotation and Visual Perspective Taking. Mental rotation reflects the ability to mentally manipulate a small object without physically rotating it. Perspective taking reflects the ability to imagine what a large environment would look like from a different position. Both abilities are important for engaging in everyday spatial activities such as navigating the environment without getting lost. The researchers have constructed four tasks to provide experience with these two abilities over the course of approximately four months. There will be an initial assessment (one week), followed by eight weeks of experiences using four different spatial ability games, a second assessment, eight more weeks of experience, and then a third assessment. The initial assessment will include four measures: Ravens 2 Matrices: The Ravens 2 Matrices is a 60 item measure of nonverbal ability. The subtest measures a participant's ability to solve problems, identify relationships, and complete visual analogies without testing language skill. The examiner shows the participant pictures or abstract designs that follow a pattern, with one element missing. The participant is instructed to point to a picture that will complete the pattern. Participants will be matched on raw score performance. Completing the subtest should take less than 15 minutes for most participants. We will use Age-Equivalent scores as our measure of performance. The score can range from 48 to 239 months and are standardized scores reflecting participant's ability level at the time of testing. PPVT-4: The PPVT - 4 is a norm-referenced test for measuring receptive vocabulary of children and adults. The test is administered individually. Each item consists of four colored pictures that serve as response choices on each page. For each item, the examiner says a word and the examinee selects the picture option that best represents the word's meaning. The test is normed for 2 years, 6 months to 90 years. Average time to administer the test is 10 - 15 minutes. We will use Age-Equivalents scores for the PPVT. Age-equivalent scores can range from 30 to 218 months and are standardized scores. Mental Rotation Assessment - On each trial, participants will be presented a shape (e.g., a block letter L) in the center of a computer screen that completes one of two silhouettes presented in rectangles at the bottom of the same screen. The open area in one rectangle is the mirror image of the open area in the second rectangle. The shape in the center of the screen will fit one of the rectangles when horizontal. The shape can be rotated from horizontal by 0, 45, 90, 135, 180, 225, 270, or 315 degrees. Participants respond by touching the rectangle into which the shape will fit once oriented properly (using touchscreen technology). Number of correct responses (excluding 0 rotation trials) are counted. Scores can range from 0 to 18. To directly compare performance on Motel Rotation with performance on Perspective Taking, percent of total available points are used on the analyses. Perspective Taking - Participants will be seated at a table with four chairs and four different objects (e.g., street lamp, mailbox, stop sign, traffic signal) representing each location on the corner of a city block in front of each chair. A stuffed animal is placed behind each object. One experimenter walks around the table stopping at various locations around the table (12 different locations). At each location, the participant is told that the experimenter is taking a picture from that location and he/she is asked to look at four pictures. The task is to select the picture that the experimenter has just taken. The four pictures consist of the participant's point of view, a mirror image of the participant's point of view, the experimenter's (correct) point of view, and a mirror image of the experimenter's point of view. This task will take 5 - 10 minutes. Participants are given 3 points for selecting the experimenter's (correct) perspective, 2 points for selecting the mirror image of the experimenter's perspective, 1 point for selecting the view opposite their own perspective, and 0 points for selecting their own perspective. Total points in this task could range from 0 to 36. Percent of total available points earned on this task is used as the measure of perspective taking to allow comparison with mental rotation performance. Assessments 2 and 3 will include only Mental Rotation and Perspective Taking Assessments. Spatial Ability Experience will include two tasks of Object manipulation and two Large Environment Experiences. Object Manipulation Experience: Two categories of tasks will be used to provide object manipulation experience: LEGO Block Play and Puzzle Construction. One task will be used in each spatial ability experience, with tasks alternating between sessions. LEGO Block Play: Participants and experimenter will each have 20 multi-colored and multi-shaped connecting blocks. During play, the participant and experimenter will alternate creating structures and copying what the other has created during the 15-minute interval. No specific corrective feedback will be given during the experience, although participants will be asked if the construction matches the model. Object manipulation rather than accuracy is the basis of the experience. Participants will be allowed to take as long as needed to complete their copy of each structure. Puzzle Construction: The researchers will select puzzles that include 4, 8, 12, 16, or 20 puzzle pieces. All puzzles will have pieces that need to be rotated to fit the puzzle board to provide the necessary object manipulation experience. The puzzle board will also include the outline of the shapes of the pieces. Hence, participants will need to match the outline of the piece with the rotated actual piece to efficiently complete the puzzle. Touching each piece with a finger will rotate the piece and removing the finger will stop the rotation. Participants will be given five puzzles to complete during the experience session. The participant will be given 3 minutes to complete each puzzle. If the participant completes the puzzle, the next larger size puzzle will be used for the participant's next opportunity. If the participant fails to complete the puzzle, the size of the puzzle will be reduced by one level. Large Environment Experience: Two categories of tasks using a large-scale virtual environment will be used to provide object manipulation experience: Hide and Seek and Wayfinding. One task will be used in each spatial ability experience, with tasks alternating between sessions. Hide and Seek Video Game: Several settings are used to limit boredom with the task. For example, participants are shown a panoramic view in a living room. In the center of the picture is a stuffed animal who was identified as the seeker in the game. They are then shown a view of what the seeker could see - which includes four different color boxes. They are told another animal (e.g., dog) is hiding behind one of the boxes. Then they are shown what the dog could see looking back at the seeker. They are asked to identify where the dog is hiding based on what the dog could see. If incorrect, they are asked to try again. They are given four different animals to located during each session the task is used. Wayfinding Video Game: Children will be exposed to a scene using Google street view and asked to search for specific targets that can be scene along the path. In order to complete the task, the participant will need to be able to identify the targets from different perspectives. Children who are assigned to the Control condition will receive the spatial ability experiences following an eight-week delay after the initial assessment.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSpatial Ability Experience

Participants will engage in puzzle construction, block play, visual search, hide and seek

Sponsors

University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Typically developing children will be compared to adolescents/young adults with Down syndrome (groups matched on non-verbal ability). A delayed start condition (verbal experience instead of spatial ability experience) of eight weeks will be used for 1/2 of participants in each group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Typically Developing Children ages 4.0 years to 9.0 years * Individuals with Down Syndrome ages 10.0 - 25.0 * Verbal Comprehension Ability at 4.0 years or above

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to follow verbal instructions * Inability of use tablet computer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Mental Rotation Ability at 8 WeeksFollowing 8 weeks of experience training.The Mental Rotation Assessment was used to assess ability to match objects rotated at varying degrees from a standard. Number of correct matches out of 18 possible matches over all rotations (excluding 0 degrees) was used as a measure of performance. Minimum score = 0. Maximum score = 18. Higher scores reflect better performance. Change in Mental Rotation Ability was calculated by subtracting Baseline (Time 1) Assessment scores from 8 Week (Time 2) Assessment scores.
Change in Mental Rotation Ability at 16 WeeksFollowing 16 weeks of experience training.The Mental Rotation Assessment was used to assess ability to match objects rotated at varying degrees from a standard. Number of correct matches out of 18 possible matches over all rotations (excluding 0 degrees) was used as a measure of performance. Minimum score = 0. Maximum score = 18. Higher scores reflect better performance. Change in Mental Rotation Ability was calculated by subtracting Baseline (Time 1) Assessment scores from 8 Week (Time 3) Assessment scores.
Change in Perspective Taking Ability at 8 WeeksFollowing 8 weeks of experience training.Measure Description: Participants received 8 trials in which they judged another's point of view. Scores could range from 0 to 24. . Change in Perspective Taking Ability was calculated by subtracting Baseline (Time 1) Assessment scores from 8 Week (Time 2) Assessment scores.
Change in Perspective Taking Ability at 16 WeeksFollowing 16 weeks of experience training.Participants received 8 trials in which they judged another's point of view. Scores could range from 0 to 24. Change in Perspective Taking Ability was calculated by subtracting Baseline (Time 1) Assessment scores from 16 Week (Time 3) Assessment scores.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants self-identified to the researchers by responding to notices placed in various locations, including daycare centers, Children helping science website, Down syndrome organizations (locally and nation-wide), etc. Following contact that included providing details of the project, potential participants who met criteria were sent informed consent documents. Those who returned signed consent documents were identified as enrolled in the study. Dates:

Pre-assignment details

Treatment vs delayed treatment (control) were identified in waves (as control required matching with the treatment group on nonverbal ability). CoVid restrictions at the start of the study and use of remote only testing impacted recruit of individuals with Down syndrome. Hence, all participants with Down Syndrome were assigned to a treatment group to maximize their contribution to the research. Typically developing children served as controls for both groups.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Typically Developing Children Immediate Intervention
Children Participants will receive 16 weeks of spatial ability experience. Spatial Ability Experience: Participants will engage in puzzle construction, block play, visual search, hide and seek
30
Typically Developing Children Delayed Intervention
Children Participants will receive 8 weeks of verbal ability experience prior to receiving 8 weeks of spatial ability experience. Spatial Ability Experience: Participants will engage in puzzle construction, block play, visual search, hide and seek
24
Down Syndrome Participants Immediate Intervention
Down Syndrome Participants will receive 16 weeks of spatial ability experience. Spatial Ability Experience: Participants will engage in puzzle construction, block play, visual search, hide and seek
30
Down Syndrome Participants Delayed Intervention
Down Syndrome Participants will receive 8 weeks of verbal ability experience prior to receiving 8 weeks of spatial ability experience. Spatial Ability Experience: Participants will engage in puzzle construction, block play, visual search, hide and seek
0
Total84

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0120

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTypically Developing Children Immediate InterventionTypically Developing Children Delayed InterventionDown Syndrome Participants Immediate InterventionTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
30 Participants24 Participants16 Participants70 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants14 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants4 Participants5 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
24 Participants20 Participants25 Participants69 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Mental Rotation Ability15.4 Number Correct out of 18
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
14.5 Number Correct out of 18
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
13.3 Number Correct out of 18
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
14.4 Number Correct out of 18
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test 4th Edition121 Performance Age Equivalence in Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 50
105 Performance Age Equivalence in Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37
93 Performance Age Equivalence in Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24
107 Performance Age Equivalence in Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 41
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants4 Participants4 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
21 Participants18 Participants24 Participants63 Participants
Ravens Progressive Matrices 2nd Edition109 Performance Age Equivalence in Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 39
90 Performance Age Equivalence in Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30
83 Performance Age Equivalence in Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 35
94 Performance Age Equivalence in Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 participants24 participants30 participants84 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants10 Participants15 Participants42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants14 Participants15 Participants42 Participants
Visual Perspective Taking Ability15.9 Number of Total Points out of 24
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
13.6 Number of Total Points out of 24
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
11.5 Number of Total Points out of 24
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
13.7 Number of Total Points out of 24
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 300 / 240 / 300 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 240 / 300 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 240 / 300 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Mental Rotation Ability at 16 Weeks

The Mental Rotation Assessment was used to assess ability to match objects rotated at varying degrees from a standard. Number of correct matches out of 18 possible matches over all rotations (excluding 0 degrees) was used as a measure of performance. Minimum score = 0. Maximum score = 18. Higher scores reflect better performance. Change in Mental Rotation Ability was calculated by subtracting Baseline (Time 1) Assessment scores from 8 Week (Time 3) Assessment scores.

Time frame: Following 16 weeks of experience training.

Population: No Down Syndrome participants took part in the Delayed Intervention Condition.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Typically Developing Children Immediate InterventionChange in Mental Rotation Ability at 16 Weeks1.3 Amount of Change in Number Correct ItemsStandard Deviation 2.3
Typically Developing Children Delayed InterventionChange in Mental Rotation Ability at 16 Weeks1.0 Amount of Change in Number Correct ItemsStandard Deviation 2.2
Down Syndrome Participants Immediate InterventionChange in Mental Rotation Ability at 16 Weeks0.8 Amount of Change in Number Correct ItemsStandard Deviation 2.9
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: Participants with Down Syndrome will exhibit no change in number of correct items in Mental Rotation performance following 16 weeks of experiential training.p-value: =0.039t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: Participants with Down Syndrome in the Immediate Intervention condition and received 16 weeks of experiential training in Mental Rotation will exhibit a similar change in performance as Typically Developing Children in the Delayed Intervention condition who received only 8 weeks of experiential training.p-value: =0.32t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: Amount of change in Mental Rotation performance following 16 weeks of experiential training will not differ for Typically Developing Children Immediate Intervention and Down Syndrome Participants Immediate intervention.p-value: =0.73t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Change in Mental Rotation Ability at 8 Weeks

The Mental Rotation Assessment was used to assess ability to match objects rotated at varying degrees from a standard. Number of correct matches out of 18 possible matches over all rotations (excluding 0 degrees) was used as a measure of performance. Minimum score = 0. Maximum score = 18. Higher scores reflect better performance. Change in Mental Rotation Ability was calculated by subtracting Baseline (Time 1) Assessment scores from 8 Week (Time 2) Assessment scores.

Time frame: Following 8 weeks of experience training.

Population: No Down Syndrome participants took part in the Delayed Intervention Condition.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Typically Developing Children Immediate InterventionChange in Mental Rotation Ability at 8 Weeks0.0 Amount of Change in Number Correct ItemsStandard Deviation 0.8
Typically Developing Children Delayed InterventionChange in Mental Rotation Ability at 8 Weeks-0.6 Amount of Change in Number Correct ItemsStandard Deviation 3.3
Down Syndrome Participants Immediate InterventionChange in Mental Rotation Ability at 8 Weeks.82 Amount of Change in Number Correct ItemsStandard Deviation 2.8
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: Participants with Down Syndrome will exhibit no change in number of correct items in Mental Rotation performance following 8 weeks of experiential training.p-value: =0.066t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: Amount of change in Mental Rotation performance following 8 weeks of experiential training will not differ for participants with Down Syndrome who received 8 weeks of experiential intervention and Typically Developing Children in the Delayed Intervention who had not received 8 weeks of intervention.p-value: =0.056t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: Amount of change in Mental Rotation performance following 8 weeks of experiential training will not differ for Typically Developing Children Immediate Intervention and Down Syndrome Participants Immediate intervention.p-value: =0.65t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Change in Perspective Taking Ability at 16 Weeks

Participants received 8 trials in which they judged another's point of view. Scores could range from 0 to 24. Change in Perspective Taking Ability was calculated by subtracting Baseline (Time 1) Assessment scores from 16 Week (Time 3) Assessment scores.

Time frame: Following 16 weeks of experience training.

Population: No Down Syndrome participants took part in the Delayed Intervention Condition.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Typically Developing Children Immediate InterventionChange in Perspective Taking Ability at 16 Weeks1.0 Change in Performance Points AwardedStandard Deviation 3.7
Typically Developing Children Delayed InterventionChange in Perspective Taking Ability at 16 Weeks1.6 Change in Performance Points AwardedStandard Deviation 5.1
Down Syndrome Participants Immediate InterventionChange in Perspective Taking Ability at 16 Weeks2.4 Change in Performance Points AwardedStandard Deviation 5.1
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: Participants with Down Syndrome will exhibit no change in Perspective Taking performance following 16 weeks of experiential training.p-value: =0.01t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: Amount of change in Perspective Taking will not differ for participants with Down Syndrome in the Immediate Intervention Condition who received16 weeks of experiential intervention and Typically Developing Children in the Delayed Intervention condition who received 8 weeks of intervention.p-value: =0.28t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: Amount of change in Perspective Taking will not differ for participants with Down Syndrome in the Immediate Intervention Condition who received16 weeks of experiential intervention and Typically Developing Children in the Immediate Intervention who also received 16 weeks of intervention.p-value: 0.23t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Change in Perspective Taking Ability at 8 Weeks

Measure Description: Participants received 8 trials in which they judged another's point of view. Scores could range from 0 to 24. . Change in Perspective Taking Ability was calculated by subtracting Baseline (Time 1) Assessment scores from 8 Week (Time 2) Assessment scores.

Time frame: Following 8 weeks of experience training.

Population: No Down Syndrome participants took part in the Delayed Intervention Condition.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Typically Developing Children Immediate InterventionChange in Perspective Taking Ability at 8 Weeks0.9 Change in Performance Points AwardedStandard Deviation 3.1
Typically Developing Children Delayed InterventionChange in Perspective Taking Ability at 8 Weeks2.5 Change in Performance Points AwardedStandard Deviation 4.1
Down Syndrome Participants Immediate InterventionChange in Perspective Taking Ability at 8 Weeks1.6 Change in Performance Points AwardedStandard Deviation 4
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: Participants with Down Syndrome will exhibit no change in Perspective Taking performance following 8 weeks of experiential training.p-value: =0.023t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: Amount of change in Perspective Taking performance following 8 weeks of experiential training will not differ for participants with Down Syndrome who received 8 weeks of experiential intervention and Typically Developing Children in the Delayed Intervention who had not received 8 weeks of intervention.p-value: 0.23t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: Amount of change in Mental Rotation will not differ for participants with Down Syndrome in the Immediate Intervention Condition who received 8 weeks of experiential intervention and Typically Developing Children in the Immediate Intervention who also received 8 weeks of intervention.p-value: 0.42t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026