Skip to content

C-BRACE Versus SCO in Community Ambulators

Mobility and Quality of Life in Community Ambulators With Knee Locking Deficiency Using a Microprocessor Controlled Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis and a Stance Control Orthosis: Randomized Crossover Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05332509
Enrollment
38
Registered
2022-04-18
Start date
2022-04-19
Completion date
2023-04-17
Last updated
2023-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lower Limb, Pareses

Keywords

Knee-ankle-foot orthosis, KAFO

Brief summary

The purpose of this multicentric study is to assess the impact of C-BRACE on mobility, endurance, confidence, participation, satisfaction, psychosocial adjustment and quality of life in community ambulators using a Stance Control Orthosis.

Detailed description

During two months of inclusion period, the investigators invite all patients matching with inclusion criteria for an enrolment visit, collect written consent and record general patient information. The eCRF (electronic Case Report Form) assigns the enrolled patient into one group for the trial (C-BRACE/SCO or SCO/C-BRACE), in a randomized order. The assessments are performed after 2 month follow-up period with each orthosis with a minimal wash-out period of 2 weeks.

Interventions

DEVICEC-BRACE

The C-BRACE is a custom made Knee-Ankle-Foot-Orthosis with a microprocessor-controlled hydraulic knee-joint articulation. The C-BRACE technology offers to a patient with knee locking deficiencies the following advantages: approximation of the physiological gait pattern, stability while standing and walking, adaptation to various surfaces, inclines, gait situations and walking speeds.

DEVICESCO

The SCO is a custom made Knee-Ankle-Foot-Orthosis with a knee-joint locked during stance phase and released during swing phase.

Sponsors

EVAMED
CollaboratorOTHER
Otto Bock France SNC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* person with knee locking deficiency * person using a SCO (Stance Control Orthosis) for at least three months, walking with a swing phase on a flat ground, without walking aid or with one cane or one crutch. * person having the ability to walk at 3km/h (measured with 10 meters walk test) with the SCO in unlocked mode. * person with a stable stance phase on the contralateral side

Exclusion criteria

* person with deficient or unstable contralateral knee, including person using a Knee-Ankle Foot Orthosis on the contralateral limb * person walking using two canes, two crutches, one or two underarm crutches or a walker * person with health condition not compatible with the study protocol * person under 18 years old * person unwilling / unable to follow the entire study protocol / instructions * person who did not give her written consent to participate to the study or unable to personally give her consent * person with knee and/or hip flexion contracture \>10° * person with genu varum / valgum \> 10° (not reducible) * person with moderate to severe spasticity * person with leg length discrepancy \> 15cm * person who necessitate the use of an orthoprosthesis * person with body weight \> 125kg * person with unstable trunk in standing position * person with cognitive impairments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PLUS-M™ - Mobility2-months12-items Self-reported measure of mobility as the ability to move intentionally and independently from one place to another.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ABC-s Activities-specific Balance Confidence - simplified2-months15-items self-reported measure of the perceived balance confidence an individual has while completing various ambulatory activities on 4-levels scale.
PSFS - Patient Specific Functional Scale2-monthsPatients will be asked to identify three activities that they are having difficulty or are unable to perform because of their condition. Patients will then be asked to rate their ability to perform each activity on a numerical scale ('0' being unable to perform the activity, and '10' being able to full perform the activity).
6 minutes walk test2-monthsDistance walked in 6 minutes
EQ-5D-5L - Quality of Life2-monthsSelf-reported measure of health status composed of 5 dimensions: mobility, ability to self-care, ability to undertake usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. Each dimension is rated on a 5-point scale.
QUEST 2.0 - Satisfaction2-months12-items self-reported measure on patient's satisfaction regarding the technology of the device and the services around the device. It allows the patient to express himself on the 3 most important criteria to him.
PIADS - Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale2-months26-items questionnaire that assess the effects of an assistive device on functional independence, well-being and quality of life from the person's disability's point of view. Each item is noted on a 7-points Likert scale going from -3 (maximum negative impact) to +3 (maximum positive impact).

Countries

France, Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026