Skip to content

Comparison of the Accuracy of Different Periodontal Probes for Peri-implant Pocket Registration

Comparison of the Accuracy of Different Periodontal Probes for Peri-implant Pocket Registration

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05332327
Enrollment
50
Registered
2022-04-18
Start date
2020-09-08
Completion date
2023-02-13
Last updated
2023-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peri-Implantitis, Peri-implant Mucositis

Brief summary

Various types of periodontal probes (e.g., metal probes, plastic/bendable probes, electronic periodontal probes) are used for peri-implant pocket depth registration; however, depending on the shape and size of the prosthetic restoration an accurate peri-implant pocket registration might be impeded with standard metal probes. There is currently no systematic assessment of which probe is more accurate in peri-implant pocket registration. Therefore, peri-implant pocket registration of 50 patients with a screw-retained prosthetic restoration will be recorded with 3 different periodontal probes; i.e., with a metal probe, with a plastic probe, and with an automatic periodontal probe, before and after removal of the prosthetic restoration.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Malmö University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* screw-retained prosthetic implant restoration

Exclusion criteria

\- cemented prosthetic implant restoration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
peri-implant probing pocket depth1 day (single measurement)peri-implant probing pocket depth in mm

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026