Skip to content

Virtual Reality Versus Mirror Therapy on Balance and Muscle Strength in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

Virtual Reality Versus Mirror Therapy on Balance and Muscle Strength in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05331703
Enrollment
40
Registered
2022-04-18
Start date
2022-12-22
Completion date
2023-12-22
Last updated
2022-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rehabilitation

Brief summary

Previous research has demonstrated balance deficits ranging from 28%-43% depending on the nature of the balance task in individuals with CP compared to controls (Kenis-Coskun et al., 2016). As balance is critical for underlying normal movement, improvements in static and dynamic balance are important goals in rehabilitation for ambulatory children with CP (Saether et al., 2013). Balance deficits are among the symptoms that having a more profound impact on motor function and quality of life inn with CP children (Lai et al., 2017). Poor balance reduces the ability to perform gait-related activities and increases the risk of falling, which, in turn, limits participation in daily activities, including sports and physical activities (Usuba et al., 2015).

Interventions

OTHERdesigned physical therapy program in addition to program of virtual reality.

physical therapy program in addition to program of virtual reality.

OTHERdesigned physical therapy program in addition to program of mirror therapy.

physical therapy program in addition to program of mirror therapy.

Sponsors

October 6 University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Their ages will range from 6 to 10 years old. * The degree of spasticity will range from 1+ to 2 grades according to Modified Ashworth scale (NUMANO and Günel, 2011) (Appendix II). * They will be on level I and II on Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) (Palisano et al., 2008) (Appendix III). * Their heights will be one meter or more. * They will be able to follow the verbal commands or instructions.

Exclusion criteria

* Severe visual or auditory problems. * Epilepsy. * History of surgical interference in lower limbs. * Botulinum toxin injections of the lower limbs during the previous six

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Biodex balance system3 monthsThe Biodex balance System to measures postural stability under dynamic stress.
Hand held dynamometer3 monthsThe hand held dynamometry to measure muscle strength of non-disabled children

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026