Skip to content

Alveolar Cleft Repair Using Osteoinductive Ceramics

Alveolar Cleft Repair Using Osteoinductive Ceramics in Children With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05331456
Acronym
ACROSTIC
Enrollment
84
Registered
2022-04-15
Start date
2022-06-01
Completion date
2025-03-01
Last updated
2026-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cleft Alveolar Ridge, Cleft Lip and Palate, Cleft Palate Children

Keywords

cleft palate, cleft lip, alveolar cleft, calcium phosphate ceramics, bone graft

Brief summary

In this study, patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate are enrolled in a multicenter stepped wedge randomized trial ithat compares alveolar cleft closure using autologous bone harvested form the mandibular symphysis with an osteoinductive biphasic calcium phosphate putty.

Detailed description

Rationale: Patients who undergo alveolar cleft grafting have to deal with postoperative pain and comorbidity due to harvesting of autologous bone. Objective: To evaluate if using calcium phosphate based scaffolds for alveolar cleft grafting is as effective as the use of an autologous bone graft. Study design: A 'stepped wedge' randomized controlled trial will be conducted by four centres. Study population: Children between the ages of 8 to 12 years with a unilateral alveolar cleft. Intervention: Study group undergoes alveolar cleft grafting with the use of a calcium phosphate based scaffold, the control group undergoes the same procedure, but with the use of an autologous chin bone graft. Main study parameters/endpoints: Main study outcome is one year postoperative residual bone volume in the reconstructed alveolar cleft. Secondary objectives of importance are postoperative pain and eruption of the tooth adjacent to the cleft through the reconstructed area. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients in the control group will undergo a procedure that is currently seen as the gold standard. Patients in the study group will undergo the exact same risks as the control group, except there is no risk for donor site morbidity and postoperative pain is significantly less. Postoperative clinical and radiological evaluation of both groups is according to current treatment standards.

Interventions

Early secondary alveolar cleft repair is performed in children with a unilateral alveolar cleft using eirther autologous bone or a calcium phosphate based putty

Sponsors

UMC Utrecht
Lead SponsorOTHER
Academisch Ziekenhuis Groningen
CollaboratorOTHER
Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Radboud University Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Stepped wedge cluster randomized trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* unilateral alveolar cleft, early secondary alveolar cleft closure

Exclusion criteria

* cleft lip and palate in a syndromic context

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone volume1 year postoperativelyOne year postoperative residual bone volume

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative painDay 1 to 7 postoperativelyPostoperative pain on a 1 to 10 scale
Canine eruption1 year postoperativelyEruption of the canine (or lateral incisor) adjacent to the alevolar cleft

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNard Janssen, MD, DDS, PhD

UMC Utrecht

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 9, 2026