Skip to content

Comparison of the Effects of Abdominal Massage and Kinesio Taping in Women With Chronic Constipation

Comparison of the Effects of Abdominal Massage and Kinesio Taping in Women With Chronic Constipation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05330728
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-04-15
Start date
2022-06-15
Completion date
2023-06-15
Last updated
2022-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Constipation

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of abdominal massage and kinesio taping on constipation severity, quality of life, bowel habits and perception of recovery in women with chronic constipation.

Detailed description

Constipation is not a disease but a subjective symptom characterized by inadequate defecation, the definition of which varies from person to person. It is known that abdominal massage, which is one of the physiotherapy approaches, reduces the severity of gastrointestinal symptoms and increases bowel movements. Kinesio taping applied for constipation can also increase bowel movement, increase the frequency of defecation and decrease the duration of defecation. However, there is a need for studies comparing the effects of these two different applications.

Interventions

OTHERSuggestions for lifestyle changes+ Abdominal massage

Suggestions for lifestyle changes+ abdominal massage will be applied. Suggestions including regular and balanced diet, fluid consumption, regular walking and abdominal exercises and correct toilet habits will be given once. Abdominal massage will be applied 3 times a week for 4 weeks.

OTHERSuggestions for lifestyle changes+ Kinesio taping

Suggestions including regular and balanced diet, fluid consumption, regular walking and abdominal exercises and correct toilet habits will be given once. Kinesio taping will be applied 3 times a week for 4 weeks.

OTHERSuggestions for lifestyle changes

Suggestions including regular and balanced diet, fluid consumption, regular walking and abdominal exercises and correct toilet habits will be given once.

Sponsors

Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 to 65 years of age * Having been diagnosed with chronic constipation according to the Rome 4 diagnostic criteria by a gastroenterologist * Being volunteer

Exclusion criteria

* Concomitant colon or gastrointestinal problems * Body mass index \>35 kg/m2 * Those who have difficulty defecating, those with anorectal dyssynergia * Being pregnant * Having neurological, metabolic and/or malignant disease * Having an open wound, mass, infection and/or hernia in the area to be massaged * Having abdominal surgery or abdominal radiotherapy in the last 1 year * Having a mental problem that prevents cooperation * Taking laxative therapy at least 4 weeks before participating in the study * To have received physiotherapy and rehabilitation applications related to constipation in the last 1 year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Constipation severitychange from baseline at 4 weeksConstipation severity will be evaluated with Constipation Severity Scale. According to constipation severity scale, women's defecation frequency, intensity and difficulty/difficulty during defecation will be determined. The scale, which includes sixteen questions, consists of 3 sub-groups: obstructive defecation, colonic inertia and pain. The score that can be obtained from the obstructive defecation subgroup is 0-28, the score that can be obtained from the colonic inertia subgroup is 0-29, and the score that can be obtained from the pain subgroup is between 0-16. The lowest total score that can be obtained from the constipation severity scale is 0, and the highest is 73. As the score obtained from the scale increases, the severity of the symptoms increases.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perception of recoverychange from baseline at 4 weeksPerception of recovery will be evaluated using a 4-point Likert-type scale. Accordingly, women will be asked to choose one of the statements as worse, same, better or better regarding the decrease in the severity of constipation when compared before and after treatment
Life qualitychange from baseline at 4 weeksLife quality will be evaluated with Constipation Quality of Life Scale. It includes a total of 28 items in 4 subscales: worries and concerns (11 items), physical discomfort (4 items), psychosocial discomfort (8 items), and satisfaction (5 items). Item scores of the five-point Likert-type scale range from 1 to 5. The highest score that can be obtained from the scale is 140, and the lowest score is 28. It is stated that as the scores obtained from the scale increase, the quality of life may also be negatively affected.
Bowel habitschange from baseline at 4 weeksBowel habits will be evaluated with 7-day bowel diary. This diary included items related to frequency of bowel movement, defecation time, feeling of incomplete evacuation, medication use, and changes in food and liquid consumption.
Stool consistencychange from baseline at 4 weeksStool consistency will be assessed using Bristol Stool Scale on a 7-point scale (from 1 to 7) which is a quick and useful indicator of colonic transit time: type 1 = separate hard lumps, like nuts; 2 = sausage shaped but lumpy; 3 = like a sausage or snake, but with cracks on its surface; 4 = like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft; 5 = soft blobs with clear-cut edges; 6 = fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool; and 7 = water, no solid pieces.

Contacts

Primary ContactSeyda Toprak Celenay
sydtoprak@hotmail.com+90312 906 1000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026