Immediate Implant Placement, Tooth Extraction
Conditions
Brief summary
Mid-facial recession following immediate implant placement (IIP) in the place of a tooth poses a significant challenge for clinicians to treat. Emerging evidence shows that connective tissue graft (CTG) augmentation may mitigate the remodeling of the buccal bone crest (i.e., bone within the gum that supports the tooth), and lessen the soft tissue recession. A recent systemic review suggested a supplemental CTG grafting to IIP as a standard of care, especially for cases that have a high esthetic risk, specifically with a thin gingival biotype (i.e., thin gum tissue) and a thin buccal bone plate. The alternative option to augment the facial contour is the xenogeneic volume-stable collagen matrix (VCMX), which favors avoiding morbidity but hasn't been thoroughly investigated on IIP. Despite that IIP has attracted considerable scientific interest, the dynamic changes of the bone crest and soft tissue, especially during the early healing stage (\<3 months following IIP), are little known. Recently, an ultrasonography protocol has been validated for its diagnostic value in dental implant research. High-frequency B-mode imaging and color flow and power Doppler are implemented to display the spatial relation of anatomic landmarks of peri-implant tissues and to visualize the flow velocity and blood volume, respectively. It provides a valuable real-time diagnostic tool to evaluate hard and soft tissue remodeling and tissue perfusion changes during the early healing stage around IIP, comparing CTG and VCMX grafting. Hence, the purpose of this three-arm RCT is to compare the clinical efficacy and longitudinal remodeling of hard and soft tissue around IIP among CTG, VCMX, and control (without soft tissue augmentation) group. This will be the first evidence of the longitudinal tissue changes around immediate implant, and the first RCT comparing the clinical efficacy and esthetic outcome of xenogenic soft tissue substitute (i.e., from the non-living bone of another species) to the gold standard approach (CTG) on the immediate implants.
Interventions
DEVICEXenogeneic Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix (VCMX) graft No Intervention: No Soft Tissue Augmentation
Fibro-gide is the VCMX
PROCEDURETuberosity Connective Tissue Graft (CTG)
CTG will be taken from the patient's own mouth
Sponsors
University of Iowa
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Age 18-95 * Has a single hopeless tooth in the maxillary esthetic zone (i.e., first premolar to first premolar, tooth #5-tooth #13) * Adequate oral hygiene (i.e., full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) and full mouth plaque score (FMPS) of less than 25%) * Adequate tooth space to support an immediate implant placement (i.e., adequate mesiodistal space of greater than or equal to 6 mm and interocclusal space to support a non-occluding provisionalization). * Postextraction vertical bone defect of the buccal socket wall was less than or equal to 3mm.
Exclusion criteria
* patients taking long-term (more than 3 months) medications affecting bone metabolism * generalized untreated periodontitis with greater than of 30% of sites with greater than 5mm pocket depths and bleeding upon probing with a dental probe * medical contraindications for having a surgical procedure (i.e., ASA Status of III, patient with a severe systemic disease that is not life-threatening; ASA Status of IV, a patient with a severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life). * history of radiotherapy in the head and neck region * heavy smoker (greater than 10 cigarettes per day) * pregnancy * gingival recession before extraction in relation to the contralateral tooth.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants That Had an Implant That Survived 6 Months After Immediate Implant Placement Either With or Without Soft Tissue Grafting | 6 months after immediate implant placement | For participants that had immediate implant placement either with or without soft tissue grafting, this outcome is determined via clinical evaluation of the percentage of participants that still had their 1 implant in place after 6 months. Note: Only 1 implant was placed per participant. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Tuberosity Connective Tissue Graft (CTG) Subjects in this arm will have a tuberosity connective tissue graft at the time of immediate implant placement.
Tuberosity Connective Tissue Graft (CTG): CTG will be taken from the patient's own mouth | 11 |
| Xenogeneic Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix (VCMX) Graft Subjects in this arm will have Xenogeneic Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix (VCMX) graft at the time of immediate implant placement.
Xenogeneic Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix (VCMX) graft No Intervention: No Soft Tissue Augmentation: Fibro-gide is the VCMX | 13 |
| No Soft Tissue Augmentation Subjects in this arm will have no soft tissue augmentation at the time of immediate implant placement. | 7 |
| Total | 31 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Study terminated before all 6-month visit data could be collected | 9 | 5 | 5 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Tuberosity Connective Tissue Graft (CTG) | Xenogeneic Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix (VCMX) Graft | No Soft Tissue Augmentation | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 5 Participants | 8 Participants | 2 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 6 Participants | 5 Participants | 5 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 3 Participants | 8 Participants | 3 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 8 Participants | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 17 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 2 | 0 / 8 | 0 / 2 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 2 | 0 / 8 | 0 / 2 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 2 | 0 / 8 | 0 / 2 |
Outcome results
Primary
Percentage of Participants That Had an Implant That Survived 6 Months After Immediate Implant Placement Either With or Without Soft Tissue Grafting
For participants that had immediate implant placement either with or without soft tissue grafting, this outcome is determined via clinical evaluation of the percentage of participants that still had their 1 implant in place after 6 months. Note: Only 1 implant was placed per participant.
Time frame: 6 months after immediate implant placement
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Tuberosity Connective Tissue Graft (CTG) | Percentage of Participants That Had an Implant That Survived 6 Months After Immediate Implant Placement Either With or Without Soft Tissue Grafting | 2 Participants |
| Xenogeneic Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix (VCMX) graft | Percentage of Participants That Had an Implant That Survived 6 Months After Immediate Implant Placement Either With or Without Soft Tissue Grafting | 8 Participants |
| No Soft Tissue Augmentation | Percentage of Participants That Had an Implant That Survived 6 Months After Immediate Implant Placement Either With or Without Soft Tissue Grafting | 2 Participants |