Skip to content

Computer Guided Buccal Cortical Plate Separation for Removal of Calcified Benign Odontogenic Tumors Affecting Mandibular Angle Region

Computer Guided Buccal Cortical Plate Separation for Removal of Calcified Benign Odontogenic Tumors Affecting Mandibular Angle Region

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05329974
Enrollment
10
Registered
2022-04-15
Start date
2018-04-01
Completion date
2021-07-30
Last updated
2022-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Odontogenic Tumors, Odontoma

Brief summary

Computer guided buccal cortical plate separation was performed for ten patients using patient specific osteotomy locating guides and pre-bent plates. The guide was designed to outline the osteotomy, buccal cortical plate was separated, the lesion was removed, finally the pre-bent plates were used to fix the separated cortex.

Detailed description

Computer guided buccal cortical plate separation was performed for ten patients using patient specific osteotomy locating guides and pre-bent plates. The guide was designed to outline the osteotomy, buccal cortical plate was separated, the lesion was removed, finally the pre-bent plates were used to fix the separated cortex.

Interventions

OTHERComputer guided buccal cortical plate separation

Computer guided buccal cortical plate separation for removal of calcified benign odontogenic tumors

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with well-defined radiopaque lesion affecting angle region, its conventional removal may compromise the bone continuity and leads to pathological fracture indicating the need of buccal cortical plate separation technique

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with any medical condition contraindicating the surgical procedures were excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intra-operative timeduring the surgeryIntra-operative time was measured from the start of the incision till suturing

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative pain2, 5, and 10 days after the surgeryPostoperative pain using 0 - 10 visual analog scale
Edema5 and 10 days after the surgeryEdema was assessed using a four grades scale: Grade 0, No edema; Grade 1, mild edema (just visible); Grade 2; moderate edema (local); Grade 3, severe edema (extended).

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026