Skip to content

LiftActiv B3 in Post Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation (PIHP)

Evaluation of the Depigmenting Effect of Liftactiv B3 Serum (Split Face) in Patients With Mild to Moderate Facial Post-acne PIHP for 3 Months

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05327361
Enrollment
13
Registered
2022-04-14
Start date
2022-03-22
Completion date
2023-03-06
Last updated
2024-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acne, Post Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to measure the depigmenting effect of a serum product called Liftactiv B3 in patients with mild to moderate facial PIHP (Post Inflammatory Hyper Pigmentation)

Interventions

DRUGLiftactiv B3

Participants will apply a dime size amount of the serum to 1 side of the face.

OTHERSunscreen

Participants will apply a dime size amount of sunscreen to cover the other half of the face.

Sponsors

Vichy Laboratoires
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Miami
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Multiethnic subjects * 18 to 50 YO * Phototype III-VI * All skin types * 50% with sensitive skin (declarative) * Symmetrical mild to moderate facial post-acne PIHP lesions with IGA scale * Mild active acne (less than 10 retention and 5 inflammatory lesions) * Agreeing not to change their lifestyle during the study period. * Capable of reading the documents presented to them, of adhering to the study regulations and accepting the limitations. * Available to follow the study * Agreeing to participate and having signed the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Moderate to severe active acne * Patients under topical or systemic retinoids * Patients under systemic immunosuppressants * Patients under active treatment of PIHP (including topicals or procedures) within the last 3 months * Patients treated with facial procedures within the last 3 months * Pregnancy * Patient with a recent change in contraception (since less than 6 months) * Known allergy to any component of tested product * Not presenting with the conditions needed to comply with the protocol. * Unable to give their informed consent * Not available to follow the study in its entirety

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation (PIHP) ChangeBaseline, 1 month, 2 months and 3 monthsPost Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation (PIHP) will be evaluated using the post acne hyperpigmentation scale. The total score can range from 6-22 points. Subscales will measure lesion size, lesion intensity, and number of lesions. Subscales are added together to form the total score. Higher values indicate worse hyperpigmentation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Skin Condition Evaluation ScoresBaseline, 1 month, 2 months and 3 monthsClinical evaluation of skin condition on subject's face which includes deep wrinkles, fine lines, skin tone, skin texture, radiance and skin elasticity will be evaluated using a 10 point Likert Scale. Each of these conditions will use the same Likert Scale from 0 to 9 with the higher score indicating more severe/worse symptoms.
Change in Global Efficacy Assessment1 month, 2 months, and 3 monthsGlobal efficacy of the treatment evaluated at each visit by the patient. The measure of the global efficacy will be realized according to the Global efficacy scale which ranges from nil to excellent which will be measured from 0 (equals nil) to 4 (equals excellent).
Change in the Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) ScaleBaseline, 1 month, 2 months and 3 monthsPigmentation will also be evaluated clinically using the Physician global assessment IGA defined as clear is 0, almost clear is 1, mild is 2, moderate is 3, severe is 4, and every severe is 5 within the treatment area.
Change in Cosmeticity Questionnaire and Acceptability1 month, 2 months, and 3 monthsSubjects will be questioned about their perceived effects of the investigational product on their skin. The cosmeticity questionnaire is a 5 point scale (1-fully disagree; 2-disagree partly; 3-no opinion; 4-agree partly; 5-fully agree).
Exposome QuestionnaireBaseline and 3 monthsSubjects will be questioned about environmental influences. Count of participants completing questionnaire.
Change in Global Tolerance Score1 month, 2 months, and 3 monthsClinical tolerance global score will be assessed, on the treated area, at each visit using first a 4-point skin reaction scale which ranges from 0 which indicates no evidence of local intolerance and 4 indicates very severe signs or symptoms of intolerance.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Every participant enrolled (total 13) received each arm of the study with treatment arm on one side of the face, and the control arm on the other side of the face (which equates to 26 participants total for the arms/groups).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Liftactiv B3 and Control Group
Participants will undergo a wash out phase of two weeks where they regularly apply a moisturizer (Hydreane Legere) in the morning and a sunscreen in the morning and at the beginning of the afternoon. On the 3rd week, participants will apply Liftactiv B3 serum daily in the morning before sunscreen and in the evening (two applications daily) on half face for 3 months. Liftactiv B3: Participants will apply a dime size amount of the serum to 1 side of the face. Sunscreen: Participants will apply a dime size amount of sunscreen to cover the other half of the face. Participant will receive sunscreen in the morning and at the beginning of the afternoon for 3 months.will apply a dime size amount of sunscreen to cover the other half of the face.
13
Total13

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLiftactiv B3 and Control Group
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 130 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Post Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation (PIHP) Change

Post Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation (PIHP) will be evaluated using the post acne hyperpigmentation scale. The total score can range from 6-22 points. Subscales will measure lesion size, lesion intensity, and number of lesions. Subscales are added together to form the total score. Higher values indicate worse hyperpigmentation.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months

Population: Only 9 participants completed the the follow up (1 month, 2 month, and 3 month) visit assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupPost Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation (PIHP) ChangeBaseline8.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Control GroupPost Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation (PIHP) Change1 month6.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Control GroupPost Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation (PIHP) Change2 months6.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Control GroupPost Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation (PIHP) Change3 months6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Liftactiv B3Post Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation (PIHP) Change3 months6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Liftactiv B3Post Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation (PIHP) ChangeBaseline8.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.37
Liftactiv B3Post Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation (PIHP) Change2 months6.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Liftactiv B3Post Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation (PIHP) Change1 month6.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Secondary

Change in Cosmeticity Questionnaire and Acceptability

Subjects will be questioned about their perceived effects of the investigational product on their skin. The cosmeticity questionnaire is a 5 point scale (1-fully disagree; 2-disagree partly; 3-no opinion; 4-agree partly; 5-fully agree).

Time frame: 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months

Population: Only 9 participants completed the the follow up (to 3 month) visit assessments. Oversight of translation from protocol to CRF caused this data to not be collected at 1month and 2 month time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupChange in Cosmeticity Questionnaire and Acceptability3 months4.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Change in Global Efficacy Assessment

Global efficacy of the treatment evaluated at each visit by the patient. The measure of the global efficacy will be realized according to the Global efficacy scale which ranges from nil to excellent which will be measured from 0 (equals nil) to 4 (equals excellent).

Time frame: 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months

Population: Only 9 participants completed the the follow up (to 3 month) visit assessments. Oversight of translation from protocol to CRF caused this data to not be collected at 1month and 2 month time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupChange in Global Efficacy Assessment3 months2.56 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
Secondary

Change in Global Tolerance Score

Clinical tolerance global score will be assessed, on the treated area, at each visit using first a 4-point skin reaction scale which ranges from 0 which indicates no evidence of local intolerance and 4 indicates very severe signs or symptoms of intolerance.

Time frame: 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months

Population: Only 9 participants completed the the follow up (to 3 month) visit assessments. Oversight of translation from protocol to CRF caused this data to not be collected at 1month and 2 month time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupChange in Global Tolerance Score3 months0.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Secondary

Change in Skin Condition Evaluation Scores

Clinical evaluation of skin condition on subject's face which includes deep wrinkles, fine lines, skin tone, skin texture, radiance and skin elasticity will be evaluated using a 10 point Likert Scale. Each of these conditions will use the same Likert Scale from 0 to 9 with the higher score indicating more severe/worse symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months

Population: Only 9 participants completed the the follow up (to 3 month) visit assessments. Oversight of translation from protocol to CRF caused this data to not be collected at 1month and 2 month time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupChange in Skin Condition Evaluation Scores3 months4.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.57
Control GroupChange in Skin Condition Evaluation ScoresBaseline5.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Liftactiv B3Change in Skin Condition Evaluation Scores3 months2.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Liftactiv B3Change in Skin Condition Evaluation ScoresBaseline5.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Secondary

Change in the Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) Scale

Pigmentation will also be evaluated clinically using the Physician global assessment IGA defined as clear is 0, almost clear is 1, mild is 2, moderate is 3, severe is 4, and every severe is 5 within the treatment area.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months

Population: Only 12 participants completed the follow up (1 month, 2 month, and 3 month) visit assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupChange in the Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) ScaleBaseline2.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Control GroupChange in the Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) Scale1 month1.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Control GroupChange in the Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) Scale2 months1.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Control GroupChange in the Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) Scale3 months1.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Liftactiv B3Change in the Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) Scale3 months1.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
Liftactiv B3Change in the Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) ScaleBaseline1.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Liftactiv B3Change in the Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) Scale2 months1.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Liftactiv B3Change in the Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) Scale1 month1.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Secondary

Exposome Questionnaire

Subjects will be questioned about environmental influences. Count of participants completing questionnaire.

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

Population: Exposome questionnaire only consists of descriptive questions (used for data collection only), so reported here as number of participants that completed questionnaire.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control GroupExposome Questionnaire3 months9 Participants
Control GroupExposome QuestionnaireBaseline9 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026