Skip to content

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivery Guided Non-Invasive Electrical and Venous Anatomy Assessment

CRT-DRIVE: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivery Guided Non-Invasive Electrical and Venous Anatomy Assessment

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05327062
Acronym
CRT-DRIVE
Enrollment
150
Registered
2022-04-14
Start date
2023-03-06
Completion date
2025-09-30
Last updated
2024-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Chronic Heart Failure, Left Bundle-Branch Block

Keywords

Non-invasive activation mapping, Coronary Sinus

Brief summary

The objective of this prospective, multicenter controlled study is to assess the feasibility of a patient-tailored implantation by creating a cloud-based pre-procedural multimodality CRT-roadmap by integration of 3D images from 3D activation sequence from ECG, and coronary venous anatomy from cardiac computed tomography. This CRT-roadmap will be used to guide LV lead placement to a coronary vein in an electrically late-activated region. Study Hypothesis: At least 75% of patients undergoing a CRT implantation guided by non-invasive electrical and venous anatomy assessment (XSPLINE technology) will show a reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume of 15% or more at 6-month evaluation.

Interventions

DEVICECRT implantation guided by XSpline, a non-invasive electrical and venous anatomy assessment

The following information and data will be obtained from the routine clinical work up of the patients: Patient demographics, cardiovascular medical history, and clinical examination; 12-lead ECG; Standard echocardiography; Computed tomography angiography for visualization of atria, ventricle, and coronary sinus. Imaging data will be transferred to the cloud-based web-platform using a dedicated software provided by study sponsor. Data processing includes evaluating the quality of the data and calculation of various anatomical and electrical parameters, and identification of the target zone as a point in the target vein closest to the latest activation zone. LV-lead location is based on the information provided by the dedicated software followed by visual X-ray based verification of anatomically suitable/most desirable position. The patient will undergo CRT device implantation according to local protocols.

Sponsors

XSpline S.p.A.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The investigation will include 9 European and 4 US investigational sites. The goal is to enroll a total number of 150 patients. It is expected about 1.5 patients per site per month over a period of maximum 8 months after site opening. The study duration is set at 12-month, 6 months for patient enrollment and 6 months of follow-up.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Eligible subjects shall meet all following criteria: * Appropriately signed and dated informed consent. * Age ≥18 years at time of consent. * CRT indication according to the 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and CRT (class I and IIA indication in patients with LBBB QRS morphology) or to 2017 AHA/ACC/HFSA guidelines (COR I). * Sinus rhythm * QRS duration ≥130 ms * Left bundle branch block * Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% * Symptomatic heart failure NYHA class ≥ II * Documented stable medical treatment for at least 6 months * No cardiovascular intervention during the last 6 month

Exclusion criteria

are: * History of persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation * Previous pacemaker or ICD implantation * Indication to pacing due to bradycardia * Patients considered for His bundle pacing or cardiac conduction pacing * Patients with unstable angina * Subject experienced a recent myocardial infarction, within 40 days prior to enrollment * Subject underwent coronary artery bypass graft or valve surgery, within 90 days prior to enrollment * Subject is post heart transplantation, or is actively listed on the transplantation list, or has reasonable probability (per investigator's discretion) of undergoing transplantation in the next year * Subject is implanted with a left ventricular assist device * Subject is on continuous or uninterrupted infusion (inotropic) therapy for heart failure * Subject has severe aortic stenosis (with a valve area of \<1.0 cm2 or significant valve disease expected to be operated within study period) * Subject has congenital heart disease * Subject has a mechanical right-sided heart valve * Subject has a life expectancy of less than one year in the opinion of the investigator * Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women of child bearing potential and who are not on a reliable form of birth control * Subject is enrolled in one or more concurrent studies that would confound the results of this study * Patients who have contraindications to CT scanning. * Patients with chronic kidney diseases and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGMR) calculated based on CKD-EPI 2009 \< 40 ml/min/1.73m2

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume of at least 15% in 75% of CRT treated patients6 months follow-upIncrease in efficacy of CRT using XSpline technology assessed by reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume of at least 15% at 6-month follow-up in 75% of CRT treated patients, based on routine echo-cardiographic measurements

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of systematic use of XSpline platform for CRT implantation6 months follow-upFeasibility of systematic use of automatic cloud-based, AI-based XSpline technology through statistics on software performance (e.g. percentage of core tasks completed higher than defined thresholds)
CRT procedural time difference6 months follow-upEvaluate the change in CRT procedural time by comparing with standard approach as found in literature, time in minutes
Total X-ray exposure time difference6 months follow-upEvaluate the change in total X-ray exposure time by comparing with standard approach as found in literature, time in minutes

Countries

Austria, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, United States

Contacts

Primary ContactClaudia M Amatruda, PhD
amatruda@xspline.com+390471200372

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026