Skip to content

A Clinical Study of the Paradise™ Renal Denervation System in Patients With Hypertension (RADIANCE-HTN DUO)

A Clinical Study of the Ultrasound Renal Denervation System (PRDS-001) in Patients With Hypertension

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05326230
Enrollment
154
Registered
2022-04-13
Start date
2022-07-01
Completion date
2032-12-01
Last updated
2026-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypertension, Vascular Diseases

Keywords

Denervation, Hypertension

Brief summary

To compare the antihypertensive effect of renal denervation with the Paradise™ system with that of a sham procedure in hypertensive patients receiving two antihypertensive drugs at the time of consent, and treated with a duo combination antihypertensive pill.

Interventions

DEVICEParadise™ (PRDS-001) Renal Denervation Ultrasound System

Following renal angiogram according to standard procedures, subjects remain blinded and are randomized to treatment with renal denervation or sham control

Following renal angiogram according to standard procedures, subjects remain blinded and renal angiogram is considered the sham procedure

Sponsors

Otsuka Medical Devices Co., Ltd. Japan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: * Patients who have received antihypertensive treatment with two antihypertensive drugs (ARB/ACE inhibitor and Ca channel antagonist, either as a single agent or as a combination) for at least 4 weeks prior to obtaining consent, with no change in the type or dosage. * Patients with a mean seated office blood pressure of between 140 mmHg and 180 mmHg systolic and between 90 mmHg and 110 mmHg diastolic at screening visit. * Patients with a mean 24-hour ABPM (ambulatory blood pressure measurement) of between 130 mmHg and 170 mmHg systolic and between 80 mmHg and 105 mmHg diastolic at baseline visit

Exclusion criteria

* Lacks appropriate renal artery anatomy for renal denervation * Secondary hypertension other than sleep apnea * Type 1 diabetes mellitus or uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes * Any history of cerebrovascular event or severe cardiovascular event, within 6 months prior to consent * Repeated hospitalization for hypertensive crisis (twice or more) within 12 months prior to obtaining consent, or any hospitalization for hypertensive crisis within 3 months prior to obtaining consent * Patients prescribed to drugs that have antihypertensive effects for other chronic diseases, and the investigator considers that discontinuation of these drugs may pose a serious risk to health * Patients who are taking drugs known to affect blood pressure and the investigator judges that it is not possible to discontinue these drugs during the study period * Patients with a history of persistent or permanent atrial tachyarrhythmia * Patients with active implantable medical devices * Primary pulmonary hypertension * Patients with contraindications or unacceptable anaphylactic reactions or uncontrolled allergy to contrast media * Night shift workers * Pregnant, nursing or planning to become pregnant * Patients with any of the following central laboratory tests at screening * Plasma aldosterone/renin ratio greater than or equal to 200 and plasma aldosterone greater than or equal to 60 pg/ml * HbA1c greater than or equal to 8.0% * eGFR less than 40 mL/min/1.73m2

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean change in 24-hour systolic ABPMFrom baseline to 3 months post-procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Mean change in 24-hour systolic ABPMfrom baseline to 6 months post-procedure
Mean change in daytime/nighttime /24-hour ABPM (systolic/diastolic) (excluding primary and important secondary endpoints)From baseline to 3, 6, 12 months post-procedure
Change in mean sitting office blood pressure (systolic/diastolic)From baseline to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36 months post-procedure
Change in mean home blood pressure (systolic/diastolic)From baseline to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36 months post-procedure
Percentage of subjects with a mean decrease in daytime/nighttime/24-hour systolic ABPM of ≥5 mmHg, ≥10 mmHg, and ≥15 mmHg3, 6, and 12months post-procedure
Percentage of subjects who required a change in antihypertensive medicationat any time up to 12 months after the procedure
Percentage of subjects who achieved blood pressure control without any change in antihypertensive medication3, 6, 12 months after the procedure
Percentage of subjects whose blood pressure was controlled by changing antihypertensive medication3, 6, 12 months after the procedure
Change in mean pulse pressure (difference between systolic and diastolic blood pressure) in the office, home, ABPM3, 6, 12 months after the procedure
Change in mean heart rate in the office, home, ABPM3, 6, 12 months after the procedure

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 16, 2026