Skip to content

Monteggia Fractures: Analysis of Patient Reported Outcome Measurements in Correlation to Ulnar Fracture Localization

Monteggia Fractures: Analysis of Patient Reported Outcome Measurements in Correlation to Ulnar Fracture Localization

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05325268
Enrollment
35
Registered
2022-04-13
Start date
2018-06-01
Completion date
2019-02-01
Last updated
2022-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Monteggia's Fracture

Keywords

elbow, fracture, patient reported outcome

Brief summary

Patients who had suffered a Monteggia fracture (lesion of the elbow) will be assessed regarding clinical and functional outcome (PROM) after treatment with osteosynthesis.

Detailed description

A retrospective, monocentric study will be performed. Patients who underwent surgical treatment after suffering a Monteggia injury or a Monteggia like lesion between 2012 and 2018 will be included. Fractures will classified after Bado and Jupiter, according to the fracture location of the proximal ulna, as well as regarding the potential accompanying ligamentary injury. In a follow-up examination validated patient-reported outcome measures (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score \[DASH\], MEPS \[Mayo Elbow Performance Score\], Oxford Elbow Score \[OES\], Pain, Subjective Elbow Score) and functionality (range of motion \[ROM\], posterolateral instability, strength, valgus-/varus-stress) will be evaluated. In addition, treatment strategy and complications will be analysed.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOsteosynthesis

Treatment of fracture with open reduction and osteosynthesis

Sponsors

Technische Universität Dresden
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with Monteggia fractures treated with osteosynthesis between 2012 and 2018 * understanding of German language (written and oral) * informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients not meeting the above criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH)Time of Follow-Up assesment, approx. 3-7 years after surgery, avg. 50monthsEvaluation of the subjective function (patient reported outcome) using the DASH-Score, 0-100, best: 0, worst: 100
Oxford Elbow Score (OES)Time of Follow-Up assesment, approx. 3-7 years after surgery, avg. 50monthsEvaluation of the subjective function (patient reported outcome) using the OES-Score, 0 - 48, best: 48, worst: 0
Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS)Time of Follow-Up assesment, approx. 3-7 years after surgery, avg. 50monthsEvaluation of the subjective function (patient reported outcome) using the MEPS-Score, 0-100, best: 100, worst: 0
Range of Motion (ROM)Time of Follow-Up assesment, approx. 3-7 years after surgery, avg. 50monthsObjective functional clinical result. Evaluation of Motion of the Elbow in ° measured via goniometer. Physiological: Flexion/Extension 140/0/0°.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ulnar fracture localization (Radiologically)baseline (timepoint of injury)Localization of ulnar fracture was measured from the proximal tip of the Olecranon to the fracture line on conventional X-ray in order to assess whether further distal fractures have a worse outcome compared to fractures with a close relation to or affecting the elbow joint \[cm\]

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026