Skip to content

AGItated Patients Management: intraNASAL Midazolam vs Intramuscular Loxapine

AGItated Patients Management: intraNASAL Midazolam vs Intramuscular Loxapine, a Randomized Non Inferiority Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05324852
Acronym
AGINASAL
Enrollment
1
Registered
2022-04-12
Start date
2023-04-09
Completion date
2024-04-23
Last updated
2024-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emergence Delirium

Brief summary

This study is a non-inferiority phase III randomized trial evaluating the effect of intranasal midazolam versus intramuscular loxapine on the rapid tranquilization of agitated patient in emergency department. Intranasal midazolam is safe and may allow a management of extreme agitation state and prevent adverse effects.

Detailed description

This study is a prospective, multicenter, open-label randomized, controlled, parallel-group 2-arm phase III non-inferiority trial. Patients with agitation at emergency department will be randomized to two arms of treatment: one experimental arm with intranasal midazolam 5mg (investigational medicinal product), and one control arm with comparator treatment intramuscular loxapine 100mg. The duration of participation for each patient is at least 28 days (+7 days if follow-up not completed on D28). An endpoint Adjudication Committee will be scheduled.

Interventions

Midazolam, 5 mg, injectable solution in 5mg/ml, intranasal administration, atomize into nose with Mucosal Atomizer Device (MAD) 5mg(1ml) up each nostril , one time

DRUGIntramuscular loxapine

Loxapine, 100mg, injectable solution in 50mg/2ml intramuscular, intra muscular administration, one time

Sponsors

Lariboisière-Saint Louis clinical research unit
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Intramuscular loxapine versus intranasal midazolam

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 to 60 years; * Agitated Patient whose somatic or psychiatric aetiology cannot be diagnosed in an emergency situation and who need a sedation in a hospital emergency setting due to the presence of unmanageable agitation with 3 major criteria. Major criteria : Agitation Pain Tolerance Tachypnea ( fr \> 20) And 1 minor criteria among : Sweating Tactile Hyperthermia Medical care Non compliance Lack of tiring Unusual Strenght Inappropriately clothed, nudity • Medical insurance The protocol can start if the THREE major inclusion criteria and ONE of the minor inclusion criteria are checked PRESENT and ALL the non-inclusion criteria are checked no.

Exclusion criteria

Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from randomization into the study: * Pregnancy * Prisoners * Contraindications to intranasal Midazolam or intramuscular Loxapine : * Hypersensitivity to benzodiazepines or to any of the excipients (Sodium Chloride, Hydrochloric Acid, Sodium Hydroxide, Water for Injection) * Known hypersensitivity to loxapine or to any of the excipients (Polysorbate 80, propylene glycol, 20% v/v hydrochloric acid, water for injections, Nitrogen (Inert gas) * Individuals who are in comatose states or have central nervous system (CNS) depression due to alcohol or are taking other depressant drugs * Individuals with severe depressive states, spastic diseases, and with Parkinson's disease, except in the case of dyskinesias due to levodopa treatment * In combination with dopamine agonists except levodopa (amantadine, bromocriptine, lisuride, pergolide, piribedil, ropinirole, cabergoline, pramipexole, apomorphine) outside the patient with Parkinson's disease * Individuals with a history of cerebrovascular accident or epilepsia * Individuals in whom a significant elevation of blood pressure would constitute a serious hazard, such as patients with significant hypertension; * Individuals with severe cardiac decompensation * Patients with severe respiratory failure or acute respiratory depression * Individuals with acute narrow angle glaucoma.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evolution of agitation15 minutesThe proportion of patients with sufficient improvement of agitation at 15 minutes defined by a reduction of at least 3 points on the CGI (Clinical Global Impression).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of adverse events following the use of loxapine or midazolam240 minutesThe adverse effects over 240 minutes : oxygen desaturation \[\<90%\], airway obstruction requiring intervention, tracheal intubation, cardiac arrhythmias, prolonged QTc interval, hypotension, extrapyramidal side effects, akathisia, and anaphylaxis.
Number of deceased patients24 hoursmortality at 24 hours
Number, type and severity level of adverse events240 minutesThe adverse effects over 240 minutes : oxygen desaturation \[\<90%\], airway obstruction requiring intervention, tracheal intubation, cardiac arrhythmias, prolonged QTc interval, hypotension, extrapyramidal side effects, akathisia, and anaphylaxis
level of sedation obtained by loxapine or midazolam.15,60,120 and 240 minutesThe proportion of patients with sufficient improvement of agitation at 240 minutes defined by a reduction of at least 3 points on the CGI. Proportion of patients clinically improved on the improvement subscale of the clinical global impressions scale at 15, 60, 120, and 240 minutes.
feelings of health providers with Qualitative research.15 min and 240 minDuration of violent and acute behavioural disturbance Staff injuries. Proportion of patients requiring the doctor to be called back.
Improvement of agitation15 minThe proportion of patients with sufficient improvement of agitation at 15 minutes defined by a RASS \< -1

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026