Skip to content

Comparative Study Between Two Adjuvant Drugs to Bupivacaine for Post-operative Epidural Analgesia in Abdominal Surgeries

Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine for Post-operative Epidural Analgesia in Abdominal Surgeries

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05323214
Enrollment
75
Registered
2022-04-12
Start date
2021-08-01
Completion date
2022-09-30
Last updated
2022-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epidural Analgesia

Brief summary

Epidural analgesia is associated with early postoperative mobilization and rehabilitation with minimally associated pain and discomfort. Analgesic effect of local anesthetics is augmented by addition of adjuvants in epidural anesthesia ensuring satisfactory postoperative period. This study evaluates the effect of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as additives to bupivacaine for epidural analgesia.

Detailed description

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidin and fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine for postoperative epidural analgesia in abdominal surgeries regarding block characteristics, post-operative analgesia, hemodynamic changes and any anticipated side effects. * Type of Study: Prospective randomized comparative clinical study. * Study Setting: The operating theatres of Ain Shams University Hospitals * Study Period: One year * Sampling Method: Random sampling Patients randomly allocated by computer generated randomization and using opaque sealed envelopes to one of the three study groups according to the adjuvant drug used in postoperative analgesia. * Sample Size: Total 75 cases divided into 25 cases in each group. Kiran et al. (2018) reported a rather large effect size comparing onset to sensory block and time to maximum motor block. In a one-way ANOVA study, sample sizes of 25 cases per group in three groups whose means are to be compared. The total sample of 75 subjects achieves 80% power to detect differences among the means versus the alternative of equal means using an F test with a 0.0500 significance level. The size of the variation in the means is represented by the effect size = 0.4

Interventions

DRUGControl Analgesic regimen

testing the efficiency of bupivacaine without adjuvant drugs in epidural analgesia

DRUGFentanyl Analgesic regimen

testing the efficiency of Fentanyl as an adjuvant drug to bupivacaine in epidural analgesia

DRUGDexmedetomidine Analgesic regimen

testing the efficiency of Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant drug to bupivacaine in epidural analgesia

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ASA I or ASA II patients. * Age group: 21-70 years old. * BMI ≤40 * Duration of procedure ≤ 180 minutes.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with known neurologic and psychiatric illness will be excluded from the study. * Contraindications for epidural anesthesia as patient refusal, bleeding or coagulation test abnormalities, local skin infection at spinal lumbar region, raised intracranial pressure and hypovolemia * Spine abnormalities. * Systemic disorders like hematological, respiratory, cardiac, renal or hepatic insufficiency. * Allergy to any of the drugs used in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Onset of sensory analgesia24 hourswill be assessed by pin prick and cold application from the start of epidural infusion till scoring 1 at the 3 point scale. Assessment will be done every 5 minutes until the onset of sensory block using a 3-point scale: 0=normal sensation, 1=loss of sensation of pin prick (analgesia), and 2=loss of sensation of touch (anesthesia).
Duration of analgesia24 hourstime from starting epidural infusion to the time of the first request for additional pain medication

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The motor block24 hourswill be assessed if occurred by Bromage three point score (0-3) for the lower extremity during the 24 hours following epidural infusion where 0: no motor impairment (able to move the hip, knee, and ankle joints); 1. unable to raise either extended leg (able to move joints of knee and ankle); 2. unable to raise extended leg and flex knee (able to move joint of ankle); 3; unable to move knee and foot.
Post operative Mean arterial Blood pressure24 hoursMean arterial pressure in mmHg will be monitored continuously and recorded just before the initiation of epidural infusion and thereafter at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hrs. postoperatively during the 24 hours following epidural infusion
Postoperative pain score24 hoursfor 24 hours using the Visual Analogue Scale ranging from 0 to 10 (0 - no pain, 10 - worst pain ever) at 0, 2, 6, 12 and 24 hrs after starting epidural infusion.
Post operative Peripheral oxygen saturation24 hoursPeripheral oxygen saturation in blood (SpO2) will be monitored continuously and recorded just before the initiation of epidural infusion and thereafter at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hrs. postoperatively during the 24 hours following epidural infusion
Anticipated adverse events24 hourslike postoperative nausea and vomiting during the 24 hours from the start of epidural analgesia
Post operative Heart rate24 hoursHeart rate (HR) in beats per minute (bpm) will be monitored continuously and recorded just before the initiation of epidural infusion and thereafter at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hrs. postoperatively during the 24 hours following epidural infusion
Analgesic consumption24 hoursduring the 24 hours following epidural infusion.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactIbrahim A Ibrahim, MD
Drhema2010n@gmail.com+201208208230
Backup ContactMohamed A Saleh, MD
senomola@gmail.com+201092847049

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026