Skip to content

Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Implementation in Central-Eastern European Countries

Preparing for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Implementation in Central-Eastern European Countries With Low Access to Biomedical Prevention

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05323123
Enrollment
120
Registered
2022-04-12
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
2024-11-30
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Keywords

pre-exposure prophylaxis, gay and bisexual men

Brief summary

To stem increasing rates of HIV among gay and bisexual men in Central-Eastern Europe, the feasibility, acceptability, and early efficacy of a culturally adapted evidence-based program to introduce pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) into Romania's healthcare practice will be established. PrEP Romania, a hybrid in-person + mHealth PrEP uptake and adherence program, aims to empower gay and bisexual men and their healthcare system to adopt PrEP and support adherence. Findings can inform evidence-based PrEP rollout in other Central-Eastern European countries with similar levels of unpreparedness for biomedical prevention.

Detailed description

Despite the effectiveness of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in preventing HIV acquisition, PrEP is not currently medically prescribed in Romania, although demand is rapidly growing. Evidence-based knowledge is urgently needed to guide PrEP's effective rollout in Romania. First, Romania has the 2nd highest increasing HIV incidence of 15 Central-Eastern European (CEE) countries, with gay and bisexual men (GBM) being one of the few epidemic-driving groups; however, there is no national HIV programming for GBM. Second, in a large 2019 GBM report, Romania was the 8th of 44 European countries with the largest gap between PrEP use (1%) and demand (70%). Third, Romania displays some of the highest homophobic attitudes in CEE, keeping GBM in hiding and underutilizing healthcare. Consequently, many Romanian GBM obtain PrEP on their own and use it without medical guidance, thereby increasing their HIV and other health risks. To address the unmet HIV-prevention needs of Romanian GBM, an established US-Romanian team proposes to introduce a culturally-responsive pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) program in Romania. Two US-based tools will be integrated and adapted 1) SPARK, an in-person motivational intervention for uptake of and adherence to PrEP using an empowering sexual health approach; and 2) P3 (Prepared, Protected, emPowered), a PrEP adherence support app that utilizes engaging social networking and game-based elements, with an in-app portal for individualized live adherence counseling. PrEP Romania will be created with the support of a local Partner Consortium of GBM-competent health providers and community members, and be composed of both in-person (adapted SPARK to build initial motivation for PrEP uptake and adherence) and mHealth (adapted P3 to provide ongoing app-based PrEP motivation, education, and adherence support) components. Aim 1 (R21). In months 2-11, using the ADAPT-ITT Model, SPARK and P3 will be systematically combined and culturally adapted. Aim 2 (R21). In months 12-20, 20 GBM will be enrolled in a one-arm pilot to test PrEP Romania's feasibility (e.g., medical visit attendance), acceptability (e.g., intervention staff protocol feedback, GBM interviews about counseling, app usability, and PrEP use), and PrEP uptake (e.g., filled prescriptions), adherence (i.e., self-reported, biomarker verified) and persistence (i.e., still on PrEP) at 3 months. R21-R33 Transition Aim. In mos 21-24, PrEP Romania's promise and anticipated R33 plans will be summarized. Aim 3 (R33). In months 1-4, necessary adjustments will be made to PrEP Romania. In months 5-30, 120 PrEP-eligible GBM in two cities will be randomized to receive either 1) PrEP Romania or 2) a PrEP education condition. Differences in PrEP adherence (self-reported and biomarker verified) between arms will be examined at 3- and 6-months post-PrEP initiation. Aim 4 (R33). In months 31-36, individual and institutional barriers and facilitators of implementing PrEP Romania will be identified by examining Aim 3 feasibility and acceptability data, and via provider, clinic director, and GBM interviews to inform a future hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSPARK

SPARK is delivered in a clinic setting by a counselor using motivational interviewing techniques (e.g., open-ended questions, affirmations).

BEHAVIORALHealthMpowerment

PrEP adherence support app that utilizes engaging social networking and game-based elements, with an in-app portal for individualized live adherence counseling.

BEHAVIORALPrEP Education

Educational information about PrEP provided by physician during medical visits.

Sponsors

Yale University
CollaboratorOTHER
Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health
CollaboratorNIH
Columbia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Men will be eligible based on CDC criteria for GBM PrEP candidates, as European guidelines are yet to be formalized: * male sex at birth and current male identity; * age ≥ 18; * ≥1 acts of condomless anal sex with an HIV-positive or status-unknown male partner or diagnosis of bacterial sexually transmitted infection in past 6 months; * intentions to start a PrEP regimen; * confirmed to be HIV-negative upon study testing; and * own a mobile device (smartphone, tablet, laptop); this is highly feasible given the high prevalence of smartphone and internet use in Romania, but we will cover phone plans if needed.

Exclusion criteria

• those not meeting eligibility

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PrEP Adherence Via Biological Measures (Binary)Measured at 3 months post-baseline and 6 months post-baselineA binary measure of blood plasma concentration of tenofovir diphosphate (TFVdp) from PrEP medication determined using via dried blood spot or DBS analysis. ≥4 doses per week, equivalent to ≥1,000 fmol TFVdp has been shown to be protective against HIV transmission. A measurement of ≥1,000 fmol TFVdp therefore demonstrates sufficient PrEP adherence (i.e., a better outcome).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PrEP Adherence Via Self-report Measures (Binary)Measured at 3 months post-baseline and 6 months post-baseline.A binary measure of PrEP adherence obtained from participant self-report data. Each week, participants mark the days over the past week on which they took or missed their PrEP dose. Each participant's weekly survey results are averaged to determine their mean number of PrEP doses taken per week over the past 3 months. The binary version of this outcome is defined as: 0-3 doses per week, on average, vs. ≥4 doses per week, on average, with ≥4 doses representing a sufficient level of PrEP adherence to be protected against HIV transmission (i.e., a better outcome).
PrEP Adherence Via Self-report Measures (Continuous)Measured at 3 months post-baseline and 6 months post-baseline.A continuous measure of PrEP adherence obtained from participant self-report data. Each week, participants mark the days over the past week on which they took or missed their PrEP dose. Each participant's weekly survey results are averaged to determine their mean number of PrEP doses taken per week over the past 3 months, with higher numbers indicating greater PrEP adherence (i.e., a better outcome).
PrEP MotivationMeasured at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baselinePrEP motivation is assessed through participants responses to a single question (If you are using/were to use PrEP, how motivated are you/would you be to take the pill every day?) with responses scored from 1 to 7 (1=not at all motivated 7=extremely motivated). Higher scores indicate greater PrEP motivation (i.e., a better outcome).
PrEP KnowledgeMeasured at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baselinePrEP knowledge is measured through 3 multiple choice questions about PrEP efficacy (e.g., If taken as indicated by the provider, how effective is PrEP at preventing HIV infection?) where responses are scored as 0 (incorrect or unsure) or 1 (correct). Participants responding correctly to all 3 questions are assigned a total score of 1 (higher PrEP knowledge (i.e., a better outcome)), whereas all others are assigned a total score of 0.
PrEP Attitudes and Beliefs - Positive Statements SubscoreMeasured at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baselinePro-PrEP attitudes and beliefs are measured via a 3-item scale scale consisting of statements describing favorable opinions about PrEP (e.g., A daily pill would be a good way to protect myself against HIV). Respondents mark their level of agreement with each item on a scale from 1 (totally disagree) to 5 (totally agree). The 3 individual item scores are summed to obtain an overall score from 5-15, where higher overall scores indicate greater positive attitudes/beliefs about PrEP (i.e., a better outcome).
PrEP Attitudes and Beliefs - Negative Statements SubscoreMeasured at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baselineNegative PrEP attitudes and beliefs are measured via a 7-item scale scale consisting of statements describing negative opinions about PrEP (e.g., I would be very embarrassed to take HIV medication if I didn't have HIV). Respondents mark their level of agreement with each item on a scale from 1 (totally disagree) to 5 (totally agree). The 7 individual item scores are summed to obtain an overall score from 7-35, where higher overall scores indicate greater negative attitudes/beliefs about PrEP (i.e., a worse outcome).
PrEP Adherence Via Biological Measures (Continuous)Measured at 3 months post-baseline and 6 months post-baselineA continuous measure of blood plasma concentration of tenofovir diphosphate (TFVdp) from PrEP medication determined using via dried blood spot (DBS) analysis. A higher measure of fmol TFVdp demonstrates greater PrEP adherence (i.e., a better outcome).
PrEP FacilitatorsMeasured at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baselineFacilitators for taking PrEP are measured via an 8-item scale scale consisting of statements describing potential facilitators for taking PrEP (e.g., the fact that I don't have to pay for PrEP). Respondents mark the degree to which each item is important to them on a scale from 1 (not important at all) to 5 (extremely important). The 8 individual item scores are summed to obtain an overall score from 8-40, where higher overall scores indicate more facilitators for taking PrEP (i.e., a better outcome).
PrEP Stigma - Score on PrEP Stigma Scale-Shortened VersionMeasured at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baselineThe PrEP Stigma Scale-Shortened Version is an 11 item scale measuring anticipated and/or perceived stigma related to PrEP use. Participants state their level of agreement (1=strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree) to statements about PrEP-related stigma (e.g., My friends would think less of me if they found out I was using PrEP). Item scores are summed to obtain an overall score from 11 to 55, with higher total scores indicate increased stigma (i.e., a worse outcome).
Depression Symptomology - Score on Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item (PHQ-9)Measured at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baselineThe Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item (PHQ-9) measures severity of depression symptoms in the last 2 weeks, with respondents quantifying the frequency (0=not at all, 3=nearly every day) of their depression symptoms (e.g., Little interest or pleasure in doing things). Item scores are summed to obtain an overall score from 0-27 with higher overall scores indicate increased depression symptoms (i.e., a worse outcome).
Anxiety Symptomology - Score on Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item(GAD-7)Measured at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baselineThe Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item(GAD-7) measures severity of anxiety symptoms in the last 2 weeks, with respondents quantifying the frequency (0=not at all, 3=nearly every day) of their anxiety symptoms (e.g., Feeling nervous, anxious or on edge). Item scores are summed to obtain an overall score from 0-21 with higher overall scores indicate increased anxiety symptoms (i.e., a worse outcome).
HIV Risk - Number of Condomless Anal Sex (CAS) ActsBaseline and 6 months post-baselineHIV risk, measured by number of condomless anal sex (CAS) acts with an HIV-positive or status-unknown male partner over the past 6 months is self-reported by participants. A higher number of CAS acts represents greater HIV risk (i.e., a worse outcome).
Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) DiagnosesBaseline and 6 months post-baselineParticipants were asked whether they had been diagnosed with any bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) over the past 6 months. This self-reported measure was coded in a binary manner as either yes (i.e., a worse outcome) or no.
PrEP BarriersMeasured at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baselineBarriers to taking PrEP are measured via an 11-item scale scale consisting of statements describing potential barriers to taking PrEP (e.g., the fact that you have to take a pill every day). Respondents mark the degree to which each item is important to them on a scale from 1 (not important at all) to 5 (extremely important). The 11 individual item scores are summed to obtain an overall score from 11-55, where higher overall scores indicate more barriers to taking PrEP (i.e., a worse outcome).

Countries

Romania, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PrEP Romania
Participants will receive PrEP, motivational counseling, and adherence support Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP): FDA-approved oral medication to reduce the risk of HIV infection SPARK: SPARK is delivered in a clinic setting by a counselor using motivational interviewing techniques (e.g., open-ended questions, affirmations). HealthMpowerment: PrEP adherence support app that utilizes engaging social networking and game-based elements, with an in-app portal for individualized live adherence counseling.
63
Control
Participants will receive PrEP during a medical visit. Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP): FDA-approved oral medication to reduce the risk of HIV infection SPARK: SPARK is delivered in a clinic setting by a counselor using motivational interviewing techniques (e.g., open-ended questions, affirmations).
57
Total120

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up42
Overall StudyRemoved by research staff due to no longer fulfilling eligibility requirements10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPrEP RomaniaControlTotal
Age, Continuous29.71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.44
28.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.71
29.06 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.09
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hungarian
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Roma
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Romanian
56 Participants51 Participants107 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
63 participants57 participants120 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
63 Participants57 Participants120 Participants
Study Site
Bucharest
32 Participants28 Participants60 Participants
Study Site
Cluj-Napoca
31 Participants29 Participants60 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 630 / 57
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 638 / 57
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 630 / 57

Outcome results

Primary

PrEP Adherence Via Biological Measures (Binary)

A binary measure of blood plasma concentration of tenofovir diphosphate (TFVdp) from PrEP medication determined using via dried blood spot or DBS analysis. ≥4 doses per week, equivalent to ≥1,000 fmol TFVdp has been shown to be protective against HIV transmission. A measurement of ≥1,000 fmol TFVdp therefore demonstrates sufficient PrEP adherence (i.e., a better outcome).

Time frame: Measured at 3 months post-baseline and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up, and in some cases participants did not provide data for certain outcomes on self-administered surveys or via blood testing. Therefore, at some timepoints, Number Analyzed may be less that 63 for PrEP Romania arm and 57 for Control arm.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Adherence Via Biological Measures (Binary)3 months post-baseline>= 1000 fmol TFVdp47 Participants
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Adherence Via Biological Measures (Binary)3 months post-baseline< 1000 fmol TFVdp11 Participants
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Adherence Via Biological Measures (Binary)6 months post-baseline>= 1000 fmol TFVdp38 Participants
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Adherence Via Biological Measures (Binary)6 months post-baseline< 1000 fmol TFVdp14 Participants
ControlPrEP Adherence Via Biological Measures (Binary)6 months post-baseline< 1000 fmol TFVdp22 Participants
ControlPrEP Adherence Via Biological Measures (Binary)3 months post-baseline>= 1000 fmol TFVdp34 Participants
ControlPrEP Adherence Via Biological Measures (Binary)6 months post-baseline>= 1000 fmol TFVdp30 Participants
ControlPrEP Adherence Via Biological Measures (Binary)3 months post-baseline< 1000 fmol TFVdp19 Participants
Secondary

Anxiety Symptomology - Score on Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item(GAD-7)

The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item(GAD-7) measures severity of anxiety symptoms in the last 2 weeks, with respondents quantifying the frequency (0=not at all, 3=nearly every day) of their anxiety symptoms (e.g., Feeling nervous, anxious or on edge). Item scores are summed to obtain an overall score from 0-21 with higher overall scores indicate increased anxiety symptoms (i.e., a worse outcome).

Time frame: Measured at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up, and in some cases participants did not provide data for certain outcomes on self-administered surveys or via blood testing. Therefore, at some timepoints, Number Analyzed may be less that 63 for PrEP Romania arm and 57 for Control arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PrEP RomaniaAnxiety Symptomology - Score on Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item(GAD-7)Baseline3.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.35
PrEP RomaniaAnxiety Symptomology - Score on Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item(GAD-7)3 months post-baseline2.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.48
PrEP RomaniaAnxiety Symptomology - Score on Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item(GAD-7)6 months post-baseline3.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.62
ControlAnxiety Symptomology - Score on Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item(GAD-7)Baseline4.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.86
ControlAnxiety Symptomology - Score on Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item(GAD-7)3 months post-baseline2.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.71
ControlAnxiety Symptomology - Score on Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item(GAD-7)6 months post-baseline3.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.88
Secondary

Depression Symptomology - Score on Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item (PHQ-9)

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item (PHQ-9) measures severity of depression symptoms in the last 2 weeks, with respondents quantifying the frequency (0=not at all, 3=nearly every day) of their depression symptoms (e.g., Little interest or pleasure in doing things). Item scores are summed to obtain an overall score from 0-27 with higher overall scores indicate increased depression symptoms (i.e., a worse outcome).

Time frame: Measured at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up, and in some cases participants did not provide data for certain outcomes on self-administered surveys or via blood testing. Therefore, at some timepoints, Number Analyzed may be less that 63 for PrEP Romania arm and 57 for Control arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PrEP RomaniaDepression Symptomology - Score on Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item (PHQ-9)Baseline4.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.38
PrEP RomaniaDepression Symptomology - Score on Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item (PHQ-9)3 months post-baseline3.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.03
PrEP RomaniaDepression Symptomology - Score on Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item (PHQ-9)6 months post-baseline4.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.19
ControlDepression Symptomology - Score on Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item (PHQ-9)Baseline5.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.55
ControlDepression Symptomology - Score on Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item (PHQ-9)3 months post-baseline3.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
ControlDepression Symptomology - Score on Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item (PHQ-9)6 months post-baseline4.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.04
Secondary

HIV Risk - Number of Condomless Anal Sex (CAS) Acts

HIV risk, measured by number of condomless anal sex (CAS) acts with an HIV-positive or status-unknown male partner over the past 6 months is self-reported by participants. A higher number of CAS acts represents greater HIV risk (i.e., a worse outcome).

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up, and in some cases participants did not provide data for certain outcomes on self-administered surveys or via blood testing. Therefore, at some timepoints, Number Analyzed may be less that 63 for PrEP Romania arm and 57 for Control arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PrEP RomaniaHIV Risk - Number of Condomless Anal Sex (CAS) ActsBaseline23.60 condomless anal sex actsStandard Deviation 34.25
PrEP RomaniaHIV Risk - Number of Condomless Anal Sex (CAS) Acts6 months post-baseline18.21 condomless anal sex actsStandard Deviation 28.72
ControlHIV Risk - Number of Condomless Anal Sex (CAS) ActsBaseline21.00 condomless anal sex actsStandard Deviation 23.1
ControlHIV Risk - Number of Condomless Anal Sex (CAS) Acts6 months post-baseline10.04 condomless anal sex actsStandard Deviation 15.45
Secondary

PrEP Adherence Via Biological Measures (Continuous)

A continuous measure of blood plasma concentration of tenofovir diphosphate (TFVdp) from PrEP medication determined using via dried blood spot (DBS) analysis. A higher measure of fmol TFVdp demonstrates greater PrEP adherence (i.e., a better outcome).

Time frame: Measured at 3 months post-baseline and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up, and in some cases participants did not provide data for certain outcomes on self-administered surveys or via blood testing. Therefore, at some timepoints, Number Analyzed may be less that 63 for PrEP Romania arm and 57 for Control arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Adherence Via Biological Measures (Continuous)3 months post-baseline1963.98 fmol TFVdpStandard Deviation 1194.07
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Adherence Via Biological Measures (Continuous)6 months post-baseline1777.38 fmol TFVdpStandard Deviation 1162.16
ControlPrEP Adherence Via Biological Measures (Continuous)3 months post-baseline1867.45 fmol TFVdpStandard Deviation 1452.07
ControlPrEP Adherence Via Biological Measures (Continuous)6 months post-baseline1481.46 fmol TFVdpStandard Deviation 1373.62
Secondary

PrEP Adherence Via Self-report Measures (Binary)

A binary measure of PrEP adherence obtained from participant self-report data. Each week, participants mark the days over the past week on which they took or missed their PrEP dose. Each participant's weekly survey results are averaged to determine their mean number of PrEP doses taken per week over the past 3 months. The binary version of this outcome is defined as: 0-3 doses per week, on average, vs. ≥4 doses per week, on average, with ≥4 doses representing a sufficient level of PrEP adherence to be protected against HIV transmission (i.e., a better outcome).

Time frame: Measured at 3 months post-baseline and 6 months post-baseline.

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up, and in some cases participants did not provide data for certain outcomes on self-administered surveys or via blood testing. Therefore, at some timepoints, Number Analyzed may be less that 63 for PrEP Romania arm and 57 for Control arm.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Adherence Via Self-report Measures (Binary)3 months post-baseline>=4 doses per week, on average56 Participants
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Adherence Via Self-report Measures (Binary)3 months post-baseline0-3 doses per week, on average1 Participants
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Adherence Via Self-report Measures (Binary)6 months post-baseline>=4 doses per week, on average53 Participants
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Adherence Via Self-report Measures (Binary)6 months post-baseline0-3 doses per week, on average1 Participants
ControlPrEP Adherence Via Self-report Measures (Binary)6 months post-baseline0-3 doses per week, on average2 Participants
ControlPrEP Adherence Via Self-report Measures (Binary)3 months post-baseline>=4 doses per week, on average54 Participants
ControlPrEP Adherence Via Self-report Measures (Binary)6 months post-baseline>=4 doses per week, on average52 Participants
ControlPrEP Adherence Via Self-report Measures (Binary)3 months post-baseline0-3 doses per week, on average0 Participants
Secondary

PrEP Adherence Via Self-report Measures (Continuous)

A continuous measure of PrEP adherence obtained from participant self-report data. Each week, participants mark the days over the past week on which they took or missed their PrEP dose. Each participant's weekly survey results are averaged to determine their mean number of PrEP doses taken per week over the past 3 months, with higher numbers indicating greater PrEP adherence (i.e., a better outcome).

Time frame: Measured at 3 months post-baseline and 6 months post-baseline.

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up, and in some cases participants did not provide data for certain outcomes on self-administered surveys or via blood testing. Therefore, at some timepoints, Number Analyzed may be less that 63 for PrEP Romania arm and 57 for Control arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Adherence Via Self-report Measures (Continuous)3 months post-baseline6.72 doses per weekStandard Deviation 0.86
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Adherence Via Self-report Measures (Continuous)6 months post-baseline6.62 doses per weekStandard Deviation 0.99
ControlPrEP Adherence Via Self-report Measures (Continuous)3 months post-baseline6.81 doses per weekStandard Deviation 0.49
ControlPrEP Adherence Via Self-report Measures (Continuous)6 months post-baseline6.43 doses per weekStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

PrEP Attitudes and Beliefs - Negative Statements Subscore

Negative PrEP attitudes and beliefs are measured via a 7-item scale scale consisting of statements describing negative opinions about PrEP (e.g., I would be very embarrassed to take HIV medication if I didn't have HIV). Respondents mark their level of agreement with each item on a scale from 1 (totally disagree) to 5 (totally agree). The 7 individual item scores are summed to obtain an overall score from 7-35, where higher overall scores indicate greater negative attitudes/beliefs about PrEP (i.e., a worse outcome).

Time frame: Measured at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up, and in some cases participants did not provide data for certain outcomes on self-administered surveys or via blood testing. Therefore, at some timepoints, Number Analyzed may be less that 63 for PrEP Romania arm and 57 for Control arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Attitudes and Beliefs - Negative Statements SubscoreBaseline14.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.29
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Attitudes and Beliefs - Negative Statements Subscore3 months post-baseline14.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.06
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Attitudes and Beliefs - Negative Statements Subscore6 months post-baseline13.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.77
ControlPrEP Attitudes and Beliefs - Negative Statements Subscore3 months post-baseline14.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.63
ControlPrEP Attitudes and Beliefs - Negative Statements SubscoreBaseline14.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.65
ControlPrEP Attitudes and Beliefs - Negative Statements Subscore6 months post-baseline14.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.49
Secondary

PrEP Attitudes and Beliefs - Positive Statements Subscore

Pro-PrEP attitudes and beliefs are measured via a 3-item scale scale consisting of statements describing favorable opinions about PrEP (e.g., A daily pill would be a good way to protect myself against HIV). Respondents mark their level of agreement with each item on a scale from 1 (totally disagree) to 5 (totally agree). The 3 individual item scores are summed to obtain an overall score from 5-15, where higher overall scores indicate greater positive attitudes/beliefs about PrEP (i.e., a better outcome).

Time frame: Measured at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up, and in some cases participants did not provide data for certain outcomes on self-administered surveys or via blood testing. Therefore, at some timepoints, Number Analyzed may be less that 63 for PrEP Romania arm and 57 for Control arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Attitudes and Beliefs - Positive Statements SubscoreBaseline14.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Attitudes and Beliefs - Positive Statements Subscore3 months post-baseline14.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Attitudes and Beliefs - Positive Statements Subscore6 months post-baseline14.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
ControlPrEP Attitudes and Beliefs - Positive Statements SubscoreBaseline14.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
ControlPrEP Attitudes and Beliefs - Positive Statements Subscore3 months post-baseline14.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
ControlPrEP Attitudes and Beliefs - Positive Statements Subscore6 months post-baseline14.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Secondary

PrEP Barriers

Barriers to taking PrEP are measured via an 11-item scale scale consisting of statements describing potential barriers to taking PrEP (e.g., the fact that you have to take a pill every day). Respondents mark the degree to which each item is important to them on a scale from 1 (not important at all) to 5 (extremely important). The 11 individual item scores are summed to obtain an overall score from 11-55, where higher overall scores indicate more barriers to taking PrEP (i.e., a worse outcome).

Time frame: Measured at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up, and in some cases participants did not provide data for certain outcomes on self-administered surveys or via blood testing. Therefore, at some timepoints, Number Analyzed may be less that 63 for PrEP Romania arm and 57 for Control arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Barriers6 months post-baseline22.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.92
PrEP RomaniaPrEP BarriersBaseline23.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.47
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Barriers3 months post-baseline21.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.05
ControlPrEP Barriers3 months post-baseline25.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
ControlPrEP BarriersBaseline25.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.49
ControlPrEP Barriers6 months post-baseline23.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.96
Secondary

PrEP Facilitators

Facilitators for taking PrEP are measured via an 8-item scale scale consisting of statements describing potential facilitators for taking PrEP (e.g., the fact that I don't have to pay for PrEP). Respondents mark the degree to which each item is important to them on a scale from 1 (not important at all) to 5 (extremely important). The 8 individual item scores are summed to obtain an overall score from 8-40, where higher overall scores indicate more facilitators for taking PrEP (i.e., a better outcome).

Time frame: Measured at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up, and in some cases participants did not provide data for certain outcomes on self-administered surveys or via blood testing. Therefore, at some timepoints, Number Analyzed may be less that 63 for PrEP Romania arm and 57 for Control arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PrEP RomaniaPrEP FacilitatorsBaseline33.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.64
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Facilitators3 months post-baseline34.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.14
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Facilitators6 months post-baseline34.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.38
ControlPrEP FacilitatorsBaseline35.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.31
ControlPrEP Facilitators3 months post-baseline35.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.05
ControlPrEP Facilitators6 months post-baseline35.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.64
Secondary

PrEP Knowledge

PrEP knowledge is measured through 3 multiple choice questions about PrEP efficacy (e.g., If taken as indicated by the provider, how effective is PrEP at preventing HIV infection?) where responses are scored as 0 (incorrect or unsure) or 1 (correct). Participants responding correctly to all 3 questions are assigned a total score of 1 (higher PrEP knowledge (i.e., a better outcome)), whereas all others are assigned a total score of 0.

Time frame: Measured at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up, and in some cases participants did not provide data for certain outcomes on self-administered surveys or via blood testing. Therefore, at some timepoints, Number Analyzed may be less that 63 for PrEP Romania arm and 57 for Control arm.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Knowledge6 months post-baseline0 (not all correct)23 Participants
PrEP RomaniaPrEP KnowledgeBaseline1 (all correct)40 Participants
PrEP RomaniaPrEP KnowledgeBaseline0 (not all correct)23 Participants
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Knowledge3 months post-baseline1 (all correct)42 Participants
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Knowledge3 months post-baseline0 (not all correct)20 Participants
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Knowledge6 months post-baseline1 (all correct)35 Participants
ControlPrEP Knowledge3 months post-baseline0 (not all correct)19 Participants
ControlPrEP Knowledge6 months post-baseline0 (not all correct)18 Participants
ControlPrEP Knowledge3 months post-baseline1 (all correct)37 Participants
ControlPrEP KnowledgeBaseline1 (all correct)27 Participants
ControlPrEP Knowledge6 months post-baseline1 (all correct)37 Participants
ControlPrEP KnowledgeBaseline0 (not all correct)30 Participants
Secondary

PrEP Motivation

PrEP motivation is assessed through participants responses to a single question (If you are using/were to use PrEP, how motivated are you/would you be to take the pill every day?) with responses scored from 1 to 7 (1=not at all motivated 7=extremely motivated). Higher scores indicate greater PrEP motivation (i.e., a better outcome).

Time frame: Measured at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up, and in some cases participants did not provide data for certain outcomes on self-administered surveys or via blood testing. Therefore, at some timepoints, Number Analyzed may be less that 63 for PrEP Romania arm and 57 for Control arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PrEP RomaniaPrEP MotivationBaseline6.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Motivation3 months post-baseline6.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Motivation6 months post-baseline6.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
ControlPrEP MotivationBaseline6.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
ControlPrEP Motivation3 months post-baseline6.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
ControlPrEP Motivation6 months post-baseline6.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
Secondary

PrEP Stigma - Score on PrEP Stigma Scale-Shortened Version

The PrEP Stigma Scale-Shortened Version is an 11 item scale measuring anticipated and/or perceived stigma related to PrEP use. Participants state their level of agreement (1=strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree) to statements about PrEP-related stigma (e.g., My friends would think less of me if they found out I was using PrEP). Item scores are summed to obtain an overall score from 11 to 55, with higher total scores indicate increased stigma (i.e., a worse outcome).

Time frame: Measured at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up, and in some cases participants did not provide data for certain outcomes on self-administered surveys or via blood testing. Therefore, at some timepoints, Number Analyzed may be less that 63 for PrEP Romania arm and 57 for Control arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Stigma - Score on PrEP Stigma Scale-Shortened VersionBaseline19.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.95
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Stigma - Score on PrEP Stigma Scale-Shortened Version3 months post-baseline18.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
PrEP RomaniaPrEP Stigma - Score on PrEP Stigma Scale-Shortened Version6 months post-baseline18.59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.57
ControlPrEP Stigma - Score on PrEP Stigma Scale-Shortened VersionBaseline20.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.53
ControlPrEP Stigma - Score on PrEP Stigma Scale-Shortened Version3 months post-baseline19.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.11
ControlPrEP Stigma - Score on PrEP Stigma Scale-Shortened Version6 months post-baseline19.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.91
Secondary

Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Diagnoses

Participants were asked whether they had been diagnosed with any bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) over the past 6 months. This self-reported measure was coded in a binary manner as either yes (i.e., a worse outcome) or no.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up, and in some cases participants did not provide data for certain outcomes on self-administered surveys or via blood testing. Therefore, at some timepoints, Number Analyzed may be less that 63 for PrEP Romania arm and 57 for Control arm.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PrEP RomaniaSexually Transmitted Infection (STI) DiagnosesBaselineYes24 Participants
PrEP RomaniaSexually Transmitted Infection (STI) DiagnosesBaselineNo39 Participants
PrEP RomaniaSexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Diagnoses6 months post-baselineYes13 Participants
PrEP RomaniaSexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Diagnoses6 months post-baselineNo45 Participants
ControlSexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Diagnoses6 months post-baselineNo38 Participants
ControlSexually Transmitted Infection (STI) DiagnosesBaselineYes18 Participants
ControlSexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Diagnoses6 months post-baselineYes15 Participants
ControlSexually Transmitted Infection (STI) DiagnosesBaselineNo39 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026