Skip to content

Financial Incentives to Improve Asthma

Financial Incentives to Improve Adherence to Inhaled Asthma Medications in Children and Young People With Asthma

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05322044
Acronym
FINA
Enrollment
32
Registered
2022-04-11
Start date
2022-07-18
Completion date
2023-09-28
Last updated
2025-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma in Children, Medication Adherence

Keywords

Electronic monitoring device, Financial incentives, Reminders, Asthma control

Brief summary

The aim of this pilot randomised controlled trial is to assess the effectiveness of a short-term financial incentives intervention at bringing about behaviour change, namely short-medium term improvements in inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) adherence and asthma control in children and young people (CYP) with asthma.

Detailed description

After obtaining informed consent from parents (and assent from the CYP), CYP will be enrolled in a 24-week programme. All participants will receive an electronic monitoring device (EMD) which will be programmed with twice daily audio-visual reminders and will be required to download the EMD-associated App onto their smartphones. All participants will be required to attend 3 study visits at 0 weeks (baseline), 12-weeks and 24-weeks (follow-up). At baseline participants will be assessed for inhaler technique and given an asthma action plan (if they do not have one already) and will be randomised to either the control group or the intervention group. Intervention period will run between study visit 1 (0-weeks) and study visit 2 (12-weeks). Over the intervention period, participants in the intervention group will use their EMD with reminders, but will also be given financial incentives dependent upon their daily adherence and will have access to some additional EMD-associated app features (including notifications, a reward totaliser and a traffic light calendar to monitor progress). Control group participants will receive their usual care plus the use of EMD with reminders over the intervention period. After the intervention period (at study visit 2), intervention participants will no longer receive rewards or be able to access the additional app features. All participants (control and intervention) will be able to use their EMD with reminders for the final 12-week follow-up period. After completion of the 24-week programme, all participants will be required to return their EMD devices and will be invited to a focus group to share experiences and feedback of the trial.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALFinancial incentives

Financial incentives dependent upon adherence will be given to participants alongside additional EMD associated app features for 12-weeks.

Sponsors

Imperial College London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent obtained from parent/guardian and assent from child. * CYP with doctor diagnosed asthma presenting to Emergency Department (ED) with a severe asthma exacerbation (as defined by ERS/ATS guidelines). * Aged between 11 and 17 years old * Prescribed maintenance inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) (which can include maintenance and reliever therapy MART) for at least 6-months. * Own their own mobile smartphone (running Android 8 or higher, or iOS 13 or higher) * Prescribed the following inhalers: Clenil, Flixotide, Symbicort, Seretide

Exclusion criteria

* Parent/guardian / CYP unable to provide consent / assent * CYP with other, co-existing respiratory conditions * Parent/guardian/CYP who are not fluent or able to understand the information provided in English. * CYP who are involved in other intervention research studies (including CTIMPs)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Percentage ICS Adherence Between Groups at 12-weeksComparison between groups at study visit 2 (12-weeks)Comparison of average % ICS adherence measured by EMD for intervention group participants and average % ICS adherence measured by EMD for control group participants at 12-weeks (post-intervention period). EMD will electronically record date/time of asthma inhaler actuation. Data from EMD will be downloaded at study visit/s. Possible scores: 0% (poor adherence) to 100% (good adherence).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Asthma Exacerbation Needing a Course of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS)study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)Numbers of asthma exacerbations will be recorded by self-report from parents/child at study visit 2 and 3. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored.
Asthma Controlstudy visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)Measured by validated, self-report Asthma Control Test (ACT). Minimum score of 0 - maximum score of 25. Higher scores = well controlled asthma. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored at all study visits.
Exhaled Nitric Oxidestudy visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)Measured by FENO which measures nitric oxide level in parts per billion (PPB) in the air you slowly exhale out of child's lungs to be completed by child at each study visit. For children, \<20 ppb is low/normal and \>35ppb is high. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored.
Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (B-IPQ)study visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)A self-report validated questionnaire to explore the child's perceptions of their asthma will be conducted at each study visit. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored. The B-IPQ has 8 items which are scored on a Likert scale 0-10 scoring system and an overall score is calculated. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 80. Overall score indicates degree in which illness is perceived threatening - higher scorer = more threatening view.
Habitstudy visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)Measured by validated questionnaire the self-report behavioural automaticity index (SRBAI) to be conducted at each study visit. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored. The questionnaire has 4-questions which are rated on a Likert scale of strongly agree (1) - strongly disagree (5). An average of all 4 questions is calculated (minimum score 1, maximum score 5), 1 means no habit and 5 means strong habit.
Self-reported Adherencestudy visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)Measured by the validated Medication Adherence Report Scale for Asthma (MARS-A) questionnaire. Within and between group comparisons will be explored. Comparisons against EMD record of adherence will be explored. Questionnaire has 10 items on a scale of 1 = always to 5 = never Likert scale. An average of all items is calculated, minimum score 1 and maximum score 5. A score of 4.5 and above indicates high adherence.
Change in Percentage ICS Adherence for Control Participants Between 12-weeks and 24-weeksChange in % ICS adherence in control from study visit 2 (12-weeks) to study visit 3 (24-weeks)Change in % ICS adherence for control group between 12-weeks and 24-weeks. Average % ICS adherence measured by EMD. EMD will electronically record date/time of asthma inhaler actuation. Data from EMD will be downloaded at study visit/s. Possible scores: 0% (poor adherence) to 100% (good adherence).
Change in Percentage ICS Adherence for Intervention Participants Between 12-weeks and 24-weeksChange in % ICS adherence in intervention from study visit 2 (12-weeks) to study visit 3 (24-weeks)Change in % ICS adherence for intervention group between 12-weeks and 24-weeks. Average % ICS adherence measured by EMD. EMD will electronically record date/time of asthma inhaler actuation. Data from EMD will be downloaded at study visit/s. Possible scores: 0% (poor adherence) to 100% (good adherence).
Proportion of Participants Achieving Good Asthma Adherence (≥80%)study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)The proportion of participants is defined as number of participants achieving an average % ICS adherence measured by EMD of 80% and above from each group (intervention or control)bat study visit 2 and study visit 3. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored.
Total Number of Asthma Attacks Over the Course of the Studystudy visit 3 (24-weeks)Self-report measure of the number of asthma attacks from the start of the study (0-weeks) until end of study (24-weeks).
Incident Rate Ratio of Asthma Exacerbationsstudy visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)Calculation of incident rate ratio of asthma exacerbations based upon self-report number of asthma attacks at study visit 2 and study visit 3 and total number of attacks at 24-weeks.
Autonomous Motivationstudy visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)Measured by an adaptation of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) for the purpose of this study. Within and between group comparisons will be explored. There are 4 items for autonomous motivation. All items are scores on a scale of 0 (not at all true) and 7 (very true). A total score is calculated from all 4 questions, minimum score 4 and maximum score 28. A higher score = higher motivation in either domain. Addition of 2 questions for intervention group only on a similar scoring scale (0 = not at all true - 7 = very true) about the influence of incentives over motivation which will be reported descriptively.
Controlled Motivationstudy visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)Measured by an adaptation of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) for the purpose of this study. Within and between group comparisons will be explored. There are 4 items for controlled motivation. All items are scores on a scale of 0 (not at all true) and 7 (very true). A total score is calculated from all 4 questions, minimum score 4 and maximum score 28. A higher score = higher motivation in either domain. Addition of 2 questions for intervention group only on a similar scoring scale (0 = not at all true - 7 = very true) about the influence of incentives over motivation which will be reported descriptively.
Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessitystudy visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)A self-report validated questionnaire to explore the child's belief in their asthma medicines will be conducted at each study visit. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored. The questionnaire is split into 1) BMQ specific (medicines prescribed to child) that has 10 items and 2) BMQ - general (medicines in general) that has 8 items - all with a likert scale response of strongly agree - strongly disagree. Questions can be grouped into: necessity, concern, harm and over-use. Total scores for Necessity: 5 = low belief in need for medicine; 25 = high belief in need for medicine
Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Concernstudy visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)A self-report validated questionnaire to explore the child's belief in their asthma medicines will be conducted at each study visit. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored. The questionnaire is split into 1) BMQ specific (medicines prescribed to child) that has 10 items and 2) BMQ - general (medicines in general) that has 8 items - all with a likert scale response of strongly agree - strongly disagree. Questions can be grouped into: necessity, concern, harm and over-use. Total score for concern: 5 = low belief in concern of medicine; 25 = high belief in concern of medicine
Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Harmstudy visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)A self-report validated questionnaire to explore the child's belief in their asthma medicines will be conducted at each study visit. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored. The questionnaire is split into 1) BMQ specific (medicines prescribed to child) that has 10 items and 2) BMQ - general (medicines in general) that has 8 items - all with a likert scale response of strongly agree - strongly disagree. Questions can be grouped into: necessity, concern, harm and over-use. Total harm score: 4 = low belief in harm of medicine; 20 = high belief in harm of medicine
Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Over-usestudy visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)A self-report validated questionnaire to explore the child's belief in their asthma medicines will be conducted at each study visit. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored. The questionnaire is split into 1) BMQ specific (medicines prescribed to child) that has 10 items and 2) BMQ - general (medicines in general) that has 8 items - all with a likert scale response of strongly agree - strongly disagree. Questions can be grouped into: necessity, concern, harm and over-use. Total over-use score: 4 = low belief in medicine over-use; 20 = high belief in medicine over-use
Comparison of Percentage ICS Adherence Between Groups at 24-weeks (Follow-up)Comparison between groups at 24-weeks (follow-up)Average % ICS adherence measured by EMD. EMD will electronically record date/time of asthma inhaler actuation. Data from EMD will be downloaded at study visit/s. Possible scores: 0% (poor adherence) to 100% (good adherence).

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control (no Financial Incentive)
No incentive. Usual care (plus EMD with reminders) for 12-weeks.
16
Intervention (Financial Incentive)
Financial incentive dependent upon daily medication adherence (plus EMD with reminders) for 12-weeks. Financial incentives: Financial incentives dependent upon adherence will be given to participants alongside additional EMD associated app features for 12-weeks.
16
Total32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl (no Financial Incentive)TotalIntervention (Financial Incentive)
Age, Continuous13.31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.58
13.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.64
13.50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.75
Asthma Control Test (ACT)20.5 units on a scale20 units on a scale20 units on a scale
Beliefs in Medicine (BMQ) - Concerns15.63 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.33
14.97 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.96
14.31 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.42
Beliefs in Medicine (BMQ) - Harm12.5 units on a scale12 units on a scale12 units on a scale
Beliefs in Medicine (BMQ) - Necessity15.19 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.33
14.69 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.28
14.19 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.25
Beliefs in Medicine (BMQ) - Overuse15 units on a scale15 units on a scale15 units on a scale
English primary language at home11 Participants25 Participants14 Participants
Habit (Self Report Behavioural Automaticity Index, SRBAI)2.75 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.09
2.83 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.88
2.91 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63
Illness perceptions (Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire, B-IPQ)26 units on a scale32 units on a scale33 units on a scale
Maintenance and Reliever Treatment (MART) regime0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Maintenance asthma treatment
Clenil modulite
4 Participants15 Participants11 Participants
Maintenance asthma treatment
Seretide Evohaler
6 Participants7 Participants1 Participants
Maintenance asthma treatment
Symbicort Turbohaler
6 Participants10 Participants4 Participants
Maintenance asthma treatment step
Combination (ICS/LABA)
12 Participants17 Participants5 Participants
Maintenance asthma treatment step
ICS-only
4 Participants15 Participants11 Participants
Medication Adherence Reporting Scale for Asthma (MARS-A)4.20 units on a scale4.20 units on a scale4.10 units on a scale
Motivation (adapted Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire, TSRQ) - autonomous22.50 units on a scale22.50 units on a scale22.50 units on a scale
Motivation (adapted Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire, TSRQ) - controlled18.19 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.39
17.50 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
16.81 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.08
Multiple daily asthma medications
+ 1 other medication
5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants
Multiple daily asthma medications
+ 2 other medication
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Multiple daily asthma medications
+ 3 other medication
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Multiple daily asthma medications
Asthma maintenance treatment alone
8 Participants20 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian or Asian British
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black, African, Caribbean, or Black British
5 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed, Mulitple ethnic groups
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other ethnic group
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants11 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants21 Participants11 Participants
Time since ED presentation35.5 days41 days41 days

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 160 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 160 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 163 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Comparison of Percentage ICS Adherence Between Groups at 12-weeks

Comparison of average % ICS adherence measured by EMD for intervention group participants and average % ICS adherence measured by EMD for control group participants at 12-weeks (post-intervention period). EMD will electronically record date/time of asthma inhaler actuation. Data from EMD will be downloaded at study visit/s. Possible scores: 0% (poor adherence) to 100% (good adherence).

Time frame: Comparison between groups at study visit 2 (12-weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Control (no Financial Incentive)Comparison of Percentage ICS Adherence Between Groups at 12-weeks56 percentage adherence
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Comparison of Percentage ICS Adherence Between Groups at 12-weeks73 percentage adherence
Secondary

Asthma Control

Measured by validated, self-report Asthma Control Test (ACT). Minimum score of 0 - maximum score of 25. Higher scores = well controlled asthma. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored at all study visits.

Time frame: study visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)

Population: Participant numbers decrease between baseline, 12-weeks and 24-weeks due to participant withdrawal

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Control (no Financial Incentive)Asthma Control24-weeks22.50 score on a scale
Control (no Financial Incentive)Asthma Control12-weeks21.00 score on a scale
Control (no Financial Incentive)Asthma Control0-weeks (baseline)20.50 score on a scale
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Asthma Control24-weeks24.00 score on a scale
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Asthma Control12-weeks23.00 score on a scale
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Asthma Control0-weeks (baseline)20.00 score on a scale
Secondary

Autonomous Motivation

Measured by an adaptation of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) for the purpose of this study. Within and between group comparisons will be explored. There are 4 items for autonomous motivation. All items are scores on a scale of 0 (not at all true) and 7 (very true). A total score is calculated from all 4 questions, minimum score 4 and maximum score 28. A higher score = higher motivation in either domain. Addition of 2 questions for intervention group only on a similar scoring scale (0 = not at all true - 7 = very true) about the influence of incentives over motivation which will be reported descriptively.

Time frame: study visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)

Population: Participant numbers decrease between baseline, 12-weeks and 24-weeks due to participant withdrawal

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Control (no Financial Incentive)Autonomous Motivation0-weeks (baseline)22.50 score on a scale
Control (no Financial Incentive)Autonomous Motivation12-weeks22 score on a scale
Control (no Financial Incentive)Autonomous Motivation24-weeks26 score on a scale
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Autonomous Motivation0-weeks (baseline)22.50 score on a scale
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Autonomous Motivation12-weeks20 score on a scale
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Autonomous Motivation24-weeks21 score on a scale
Secondary

Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Concern

A self-report validated questionnaire to explore the child's belief in their asthma medicines will be conducted at each study visit. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored. The questionnaire is split into 1) BMQ specific (medicines prescribed to child) that has 10 items and 2) BMQ - general (medicines in general) that has 8 items - all with a likert scale response of strongly agree - strongly disagree. Questions can be grouped into: necessity, concern, harm and over-use. Total score for concern: 5 = low belief in concern of medicine; 25 = high belief in concern of medicine

Time frame: study visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)

Population: Participant numbers decrease between baseline, 12-weeks and 24-weeks due to participant withdrawal

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control (no Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Concern0-weeks (baseline)15.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
Control (no Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Concern12-weeks15.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.74
Control (no Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Concern24-weeks16.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.34
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Concern0-weeks (baseline)14.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.42
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Concern12-weeks15.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Concern24-weeks15.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
Secondary

Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Harm

A self-report validated questionnaire to explore the child's belief in their asthma medicines will be conducted at each study visit. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored. The questionnaire is split into 1) BMQ specific (medicines prescribed to child) that has 10 items and 2) BMQ - general (medicines in general) that has 8 items - all with a likert scale response of strongly agree - strongly disagree. Questions can be grouped into: necessity, concern, harm and over-use. Total harm score: 4 = low belief in harm of medicine; 20 = high belief in harm of medicine

Time frame: study visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)

Population: Participant numbers decrease between baseline, 12-weeks and 24-weeks due to participant withdrawal

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Control (no Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Harm0-weeks (baseline)12.5 score on a scale
Control (no Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Harm12-weeks14 score on a scale
Control (no Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Harm24-weeks12.5 score on a scale
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Harm0-weeks (baseline)12 score on a scale
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Harm12-weeks12 score on a scale
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Harm24-weeks13 score on a scale
Secondary

Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity

A self-report validated questionnaire to explore the child's belief in their asthma medicines will be conducted at each study visit. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored. The questionnaire is split into 1) BMQ specific (medicines prescribed to child) that has 10 items and 2) BMQ - general (medicines in general) that has 8 items - all with a likert scale response of strongly agree - strongly disagree. Questions can be grouped into: necessity, concern, harm and over-use. Total scores for Necessity: 5 = low belief in need for medicine; 25 = high belief in need for medicine

Time frame: study visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)

Population: Participant numbers decrease between baseline, 12-weeks and 24-weeks due to participant withdrawal

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control (no Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity0-weeks (baseline)15.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.33
Control (no Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity12-weeks15.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.89
Control (no Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity24-weeks16.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.25
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity0-weeks (baseline)14.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.25
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity12-weeks16.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity24-weeks14.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.25
Secondary

Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Over-use

A self-report validated questionnaire to explore the child's belief in their asthma medicines will be conducted at each study visit. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored. The questionnaire is split into 1) BMQ specific (medicines prescribed to child) that has 10 items and 2) BMQ - general (medicines in general) that has 8 items - all with a likert scale response of strongly agree - strongly disagree. Questions can be grouped into: necessity, concern, harm and over-use. Total over-use score: 4 = low belief in medicine over-use; 20 = high belief in medicine over-use

Time frame: study visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)

Population: Participant numbers decrease between baseline, 12-weeks and 24-weeks due to participant withdrawal

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Control (no Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Over-use0-weeks (baseline)15 score on a scale
Control (no Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Over-use12-weeks15 score on a scale
Control (no Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Over-use24-weeks15.5 score on a scale
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Over-use0-weeks (baseline)15 score on a scale
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Over-use12-weeks14 score on a scale
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Belief in Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) - Over-use24-weeks14 score on a scale
Secondary

Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (B-IPQ)

A self-report validated questionnaire to explore the child's perceptions of their asthma will be conducted at each study visit. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored. The B-IPQ has 8 items which are scored on a Likert scale 0-10 scoring system and an overall score is calculated. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 80. Overall score indicates degree in which illness is perceived threatening - higher scorer = more threatening view.

Time frame: study visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)

Population: Participant numbers decrease between baseline, 12-weeks and 24-weeks due to participant withdrawal

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Control (no Financial Incentive)Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (B-IPQ)0-weeks (baseline)26 score on a scale
Control (no Financial Incentive)Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (B-IPQ)12-weeks23.50 score on a scale
Control (no Financial Incentive)Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (B-IPQ)24-weeks21.00 score on a scale
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (B-IPQ)0-weeks (baseline)33 score on a scale
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (B-IPQ)12-weeks26 score on a scale
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (B-IPQ)24-weeks26 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Percentage ICS Adherence for Control Participants Between 12-weeks and 24-weeks

Change in % ICS adherence for control group between 12-weeks and 24-weeks. Average % ICS adherence measured by EMD. EMD will electronically record date/time of asthma inhaler actuation. Data from EMD will be downloaded at study visit/s. Possible scores: 0% (poor adherence) to 100% (good adherence).

Time frame: Change in % ICS adherence in control from study visit 2 (12-weeks) to study visit 3 (24-weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Control (no Financial Incentive)Change in Percentage ICS Adherence for Control Participants Between 12-weeks and 24-weeks56 percentage of adherence
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Change in Percentage ICS Adherence for Control Participants Between 12-weeks and 24-weeks31.5 percentage of adherence
Secondary

Change in Percentage ICS Adherence for Intervention Participants Between 12-weeks and 24-weeks

Change in % ICS adherence for intervention group between 12-weeks and 24-weeks. Average % ICS adherence measured by EMD. EMD will electronically record date/time of asthma inhaler actuation. Data from EMD will be downloaded at study visit/s. Possible scores: 0% (poor adherence) to 100% (good adherence).

Time frame: Change in % ICS adherence in intervention from study visit 2 (12-weeks) to study visit 3 (24-weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Control (no Financial Incentive)Change in Percentage ICS Adherence for Intervention Participants Between 12-weeks and 24-weeks73 percentage of adherence
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Change in Percentage ICS Adherence for Intervention Participants Between 12-weeks and 24-weeks39 percentage of adherence
Secondary

Comparison of Percentage ICS Adherence Between Groups at 24-weeks (Follow-up)

Average % ICS adherence measured by EMD. EMD will electronically record date/time of asthma inhaler actuation. Data from EMD will be downloaded at study visit/s. Possible scores: 0% (poor adherence) to 100% (good adherence).

Time frame: Comparison between groups at 24-weeks (follow-up)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Control (no Financial Incentive)Comparison of Percentage ICS Adherence Between Groups at 24-weeks (Follow-up)31.5 percentage of adherence
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Comparison of Percentage ICS Adherence Between Groups at 24-weeks (Follow-up)39 percentage of adherence
Secondary

Controlled Motivation

Measured by an adaptation of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) for the purpose of this study. Within and between group comparisons will be explored. There are 4 items for controlled motivation. All items are scores on a scale of 0 (not at all true) and 7 (very true). A total score is calculated from all 4 questions, minimum score 4 and maximum score 28. A higher score = higher motivation in either domain. Addition of 2 questions for intervention group only on a similar scoring scale (0 = not at all true - 7 = very true) about the influence of incentives over motivation which will be reported descriptively.

Time frame: study visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)

Population: Participant numbers decrease between baseline, 12-weeks and 24-weeks due to participant withdrawal

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control (no Financial Incentive)Controlled Motivation0-weeks (baseline)18.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.39
Control (no Financial Incentive)Controlled Motivation12-weeks14.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.51
Control (no Financial Incentive)Controlled Motivation24-weeks17.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.16
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Controlled Motivation0-weeks (baseline)16.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.08
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Controlled Motivation12-weeks17.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.73
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Controlled Motivation24-weeks15.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.95
Secondary

Exhaled Nitric Oxide

Measured by FENO which measures nitric oxide level in parts per billion (PPB) in the air you slowly exhale out of child's lungs to be completed by child at each study visit. For children, \<20 ppb is low/normal and \>35ppb is high. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored.

Time frame: study visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)

Population: Participant numbers decrease between baseline, 12-weeks and 24-weeks due to participant withdrawal

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Control (no Financial Incentive)Exhaled Nitric Oxide0-weeks24 ppb
Control (no Financial Incentive)Exhaled Nitric Oxide12-weeks55.50 ppb
Control (no Financial Incentive)Exhaled Nitric Oxide24-weeks46.50 ppb
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Exhaled Nitric Oxide0-weeks51 ppb
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Exhaled Nitric Oxide12-weeks66.50 ppb
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Exhaled Nitric Oxide24-weeks102 ppb
Secondary

Habit

Measured by validated questionnaire the self-report behavioural automaticity index (SRBAI) to be conducted at each study visit. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored. The questionnaire has 4-questions which are rated on a Likert scale of strongly agree (1) - strongly disagree (5). An average of all 4 questions is calculated (minimum score 1, maximum score 5), 1 means no habit and 5 means strong habit.

Time frame: study visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)

Population: Participant numbers decrease between baseline, 12-weeks and 24-weeks due to participant withdrawal

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control (no Financial Incentive)Habit0-weeks (baseline)2.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Control (no Financial Incentive)Habit12-weeks2.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Control (no Financial Incentive)Habit24-weeks2.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Habit0-weeks (baseline)2.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Habit12-weeks2.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Habit24-weeks3.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Secondary

Incident Rate Ratio of Asthma Exacerbations

Calculation of incident rate ratio of asthma exacerbations based upon self-report number of asthma attacks at study visit 2 and study visit 3 and total number of attacks at 24-weeks.

Time frame: study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)

Population: Self-reported number of asthma attacks collected was too low to calculate the incident rate ratio of asthma exacerbations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Control (no Financial Incentive)Incident Rate Ratio of Asthma ExacerbationsNA ratio (unitless number)
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Incident Rate Ratio of Asthma ExacerbationsNA ratio (unitless number)
Secondary

Number of Asthma Exacerbation Needing a Course of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS)

Numbers of asthma exacerbations will be recorded by self-report from parents/child at study visit 2 and 3. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored.

Time frame: study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)

Population: Number of participants decreased between 12- and 24-weeks due to participant withdrawal

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control (no Financial Incentive)Number of Asthma Exacerbation Needing a Course of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS)12-weeks1 Participants
Control (no Financial Incentive)Number of Asthma Exacerbation Needing a Course of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS)24-weeks0 Participants
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Number of Asthma Exacerbation Needing a Course of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS)12-weeks2 Participants
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Number of Asthma Exacerbation Needing a Course of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS)24-weeks1 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Achieving Good Asthma Adherence (≥80%)

The proportion of participants is defined as number of participants achieving an average % ICS adherence measured by EMD of 80% and above from each group (intervention or control)bat study visit 2 and study visit 3. Within and between group comparisons between groups will be explored.

Time frame: study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)

Population: Participant numbers decrease between baseline, 12-weeks and 24-weeks due to participant withdrawal

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Control (no Financial Incentive)Proportion of Participants Achieving Good Asthma Adherence (≥80%)12-weeks1 participants
Control (no Financial Incentive)Proportion of Participants Achieving Good Asthma Adherence (≥80%)24-weeks0 participants
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Proportion of Participants Achieving Good Asthma Adherence (≥80%)12-weeks4 participants
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Proportion of Participants Achieving Good Asthma Adherence (≥80%)24-weeks0 participants
Secondary

Self-reported Adherence

Measured by the validated Medication Adherence Report Scale for Asthma (MARS-A) questionnaire. Within and between group comparisons will be explored. Comparisons against EMD record of adherence will be explored. Questionnaire has 10 items on a scale of 1 = always to 5 = never Likert scale. An average of all items is calculated, minimum score 1 and maximum score 5. A score of 4.5 and above indicates high adherence.

Time frame: study visit 1 (0 weeks), study visit 2 (12-weeks) and study visit 3 (24-weeks)

Population: Participant numbers decrease between baseline, 12-weeks and 24-weeks due to participant withdrawal

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Control (no Financial Incentive)Self-reported Adherence0-weeks (baseline)4.20 score on a scale
Control (no Financial Incentive)Self-reported Adherence12-weeks4.30 score on a scale
Control (no Financial Incentive)Self-reported Adherence24-weeks4.20 score on a scale
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Self-reported Adherence0-weeks (baseline)4.1 score on a scale
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Self-reported Adherence12-weeks4.20 score on a scale
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Self-reported Adherence24-weeks4.10 score on a scale
Secondary

Total Number of Asthma Attacks Over the Course of the Study

Self-report measure of the number of asthma attacks from the start of the study (0-weeks) until end of study (24-weeks).

Time frame: study visit 3 (24-weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Control (no Financial Incentive)Total Number of Asthma Attacks Over the Course of the Study1 Number of attacks
Intervention (Financial Incentive)Total Number of Asthma Attacks Over the Course of the Study3 Number of attacks

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026