Skip to content

Comparison of Somatosensory Versus Endurance-strength Exercise in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain

Comparison of Somatosensory Exercise Versus Endurance-strength Exercise in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05321537
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-04-11
Start date
2022-03-19
Completion date
2023-05-08
Last updated
2023-05-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Keywords

neck pain, chronic pain, therapeutic exercise, proprioception, motor control

Brief summary

Aim: To compare the effects of somatosensory exercise vs endurance-strength exercise on the deep cervical flexor muscles on pain and perceived disability in patients with chronic neck pain. Study design: Protocol of a clinical trial, controlled, parallel and a blinded assessor. Population: Subjects aged 18 to 65 years with neck pain of 3 or more months of evolution.

Detailed description

The study will be carried out at the Faculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy of the University of Alcalá. A total of 60 subjects with nonspecific chronic neck pain will be selected and randomly assigned into two intervention groups. The first group will perform a somatosensory exercise program and a second group will perform activation and endurance-strength exercises of the deep cervical flexors. The duration of the intervention will be 8 weeks, with 6 sessions of physical therapy and daily home exercise. The variables pain, pressure pain threshold, disability, endurance-strength, proprioception, quality of life, kinesiophobia, quality of sleep and depression will be analyzed. Measurements will be taken pre-treatment, post-treatment and a follow-up at 3 months.

Interventions

OTHERTherapeutic exercises

A somatosensory training and an endurance-strength training protocol

Sponsors

Alexander Achalandabaso
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The evaluator will not know to which treatment group each belongs.

Intervention model description

A single center, parallel, randomized, blinded rater, controlled clinical trial will be conducted. The 25 requirements proposed by the CONSORT declaration will be followed.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects of age between 18 and 65 years * Neck pain of 3 or more months of evolution

Exclusion criteria

* Cervical Disability Index less than 15/50 * Infection * Oncological processes * Neck or arm surgery * Neck or arm trauma * Positive neurological signs * Rheumatic diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain changePre-intervention, post-intervention (2 months) and follow-up of 3 months after the end.To assess pain, the Visual Analogue Scale will be used, which consists of a 10-centimeter horizontal line, at whose ends is the maximum expression of a symptom.
Disability changePre-intervention, post-intervention (2 months) and follow-up of 3 months after the end.Disability will be assessed using the validated Spanish version of the Cervical Disability Index. Its range score is 0-50, higher values mean greater disability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proprioception changePre-intervention, post-intervention (2 months) and follow-up of 3 months after the end.The proprioception of the head and neck in space will be evaluated using the Cervical Joint Positioning Error Test.
Kinesiophobia changePre-intervention, post-intervention (2 months) and follow-up of 3 months after the end.The patients' level of fear of movement will be evaluated using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. Range score is 11-44, higher values mean greater fear of injury.
Pressure Pain Threshold changePre-intervention, post-intervention (2 months) and follow-up of 3 months after the end.To assess the Pressure Pain Threshold, a analog pressure algometer will be used. The pressure will be performed bilaterally on the levator scapulae, upper trapezius, splenius capitis and sternocleidomastoid.
Quality of life changePre-intervention, post-intervention (2 months) and follow-up of 3 months after the end.Quality of life will be assessed with the 12-Item Short Form Survey, second version (SF-12v2), using its Spanish version. This questionnaire is made up of 12 items which measure both physical and mental items. Range score is PCS 24-56,6 and MCS 19-60,8, higher values mean higher quality of life.
Depression changePre-intervention, post-intervention (2 months) and follow-up of 3 months after the end.To assess depression, the Beck Depression Inventory in its second edition (BDI-II), in its Spanish version, will be used. Range score is 0-63, higher values mean worse outcome.
Sleep quality changePre-intervention, post-intervention (2 months) and follow-up of 3 months after the end.To assess sleep quality we will use the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, using the Spanish version. Range score is 0-21, higher values mean worse outcome.
Endurance of craniocervical flexion changePre-intervention, post-intervention (2 months) and follow-up of 3 months after the end.The isometric endurance of the deep flexor muscles of the neck will be measured with the Craniocervical Flexion Test, using a pressure biofeedback.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026