Skip to content

The Effect of Home-based Rehabilitation Program After COVID-19 Infection

The Cardiopulmonary Function Outcome and the Effect of Two Modules of Home-based Rehabilitation Programs in Patients After COVID-19 Infection - A Randomized and Controlled Trial.

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05317975
Enrollment
13
Registered
2022-04-08
Start date
2021-07-15
Completion date
2025-02-17
Last updated
2025-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COVID-19

Keywords

COVID-19, Rehabilitation, Cardiopulmonary exercise testing

Brief summary

To follow up the cardiopulmonary function after coronavirus disease 2019 (CoVID-19) infection and compare the effect of a 12-week home-based cardiopulmonary with or without add-on remote rehabilitation on the cardiopulmonary function, emotion and quality of outcome.

Detailed description

The investigators will recruit the patients post-CoVID infection for a cardiopulmonary function evaluation and a home-based rehabilitation program. The investigators hypothesize that an add-on remote rehabilitation on a home-based rehabilitation has a better effect than a home-based rehabilitation alone on the compliance rate for the exercise, and also a better outcome in terms of cardiopulmonary function testing, 6-minute walking test, physical activities and quality of life, as well as less dyspnea, depression and anxiety.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAdd-on telerehabilitation and home-based rehabilitation

1. 12wk home-based rehabilitation including individualized exercise training and inspiratory muscle training with symptoms monitoring. Participants will be provided with a manual and routine telephone follow-up by a case manager. 2. Add-on telerehabilitation for instruction and supervision of exercise training

BEHAVIORALHome-based rehabilitation alone

12wk home-based rehabilitation including individualized exercise training and inspiratory muscle training with symptoms monitoring. Participants will be provided with a manual and routine telephone follow-up by a case manager.

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. ≥ 20 years of age. 2. COVID-19 survivor after de-isolation at post-acute stage about to be discharged or already at outpatient follow-up who still have symptoms or exercise intolerance.

Exclusion criteria

1. Unable to cooperate with rehabilitation or evaluation. 2. Dependent in basic activities of living before infection (Premorbid Barthel index \<80). 3. End stage patient, with life expectancy less than 1 year. 4. Having contraindications for exercise according to the evaluation of a physician.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of 6-minute walking test (6MWT) and exercise capacityThe change in 6MWT and peak oxygen uptake will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention.The distance of a 6-minute walking test and peak oxygen uptake according to cardiopulmonary exercise test will be assessed before intervention (12-week rehabilitation course), 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
FatigueThe change in BFI will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention.The investigators will assess the change in the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI). The total score of BFI ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater level of fatigue.
Depression and anxietyThe change in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention.The investigators will assess the change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7). The PHQ-9 score ranges from 0-27 and the GAD-7 score ranges 0-21. Higher scores indicate worsen symptoms.
Dyspnea scaleThe change in mMRC will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention.The investigators will assess the change in the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale. The mMRC scale ranges from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate worsen symptoms.
Quality of life evaluationThe change in EQ-5D will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention.The investigators will assess the change in EuroQol-5D.
Grip strengthThe change in grip strength will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention.The investigators will assess the grip strength using a grip goniometer with the participants seated and the elbow flexed at 90 degree.
Cognitive evaluationThe change in MoCA will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after intervention.The investigators will assess the change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The total score of MoCA ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026