Skip to content

A Novel Remote Patient and Medication Monitoring Solution to Improve Adherence and PerSiStence With IBD Therapy

A Novel Remote Patient and Medication Monitoring Solution to Improve Adherence and PerSiStence With Inflammatory Bowel DiSease Therapy-ASSIST Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05316584
Acronym
ASSIST
Enrollment
123
Registered
2022-04-07
Start date
2022-09-06
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohn Disease, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Ulcerative Colitis

Keywords

Inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn disease, Ulcerative colitis, Adherence, Remote monitoring

Brief summary

The investigators hypothesize that use of a remote monitoring digital health system that supports medication taking and monitoring of symptoms will improve adherence, clinical outcomes, and decrease healthcare utilization compared to standard care in participants with inflammatory bowel disease initiating oral or subcutaneous treatment. The investigators are conducting a 12-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a remote monitoring digital health system on adherence, clinical outcomes, and healthcare utilization. The investigators will address the following specific aims: 1. Compare adherence as measured by the medication possession ratio in participants using a remote monitoring digital health system compared to standard of care. 2. Compare clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization in participants using a remote monitoring digital health system compared to standard of care.

Detailed description

The investigators hypothesize that use of a remote monitoring digital health system that supports medication taking and monitoring of symptoms will improve adherence, clinical outcomes, and decrease healthcare utilization compared to standard care in participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) initiating oral or subcutaneous treatment. The investigators are conducting a 12-month multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a remote monitoring digital health system on adherence, clinical outcomes, and healthcare utilization. Adult participants with IBD with regular access to a mobile device or tablet initiating therapy with an oral or subcutaneous treatment for IBD at one of the five sites will be eligible to participate. Participants will be randomized 2:1 to the intervention or standard care. Eligible participants will complete an informed consent and baseline survey gathering demographic and clinical information. TapptTM digital health system (developed by Synchronyx) is a remote therapeutic monitoring and digital engagement solution that monitors real-time medication adherence patterns through smart label technologies, capture patient reported outcomes (PROs) and barriers to care, and process patient data through algorithms that trigger personalized digital and human touchpoints between clinical visits. The research team will input information into the system on the intervention participant's medication to be tracked, dose, and frequency of dosing. Participants in the intervention group will be shipped the smart labels to be affixed to the pill bottle, pen, or syringe of the newly prescribed medication. Prior to receiving their medication, participants will receive virtual training on how to attach and use the proprietary labels, set up their participant profile, use the participant-facing web app, and seek technical helpdesk support. At the time of a medication dose, participants will scan the label by tapping it with their mobile device to verify that they are taking the medication. Upon scanning, participants immediately will receive a notification on their device indicating that the label was successfully scanned, and that their medication adherence was updated in their profile. The app offers participants visibility into their medication adherence patterns and upcoming doses, as well as the opportunity to respond to in-app questions that capture barriers towards adherence, IBD symptoms, and patient report outcomes (PROs). This information will also be available to the research and clinical team in real-time via the provider dashboard. Most importantly, the dashboard's artificial intelligence-based algorithm will send email alerts to the clinical team if participant's adherence, symptoms, or PROs fall below predetermined thresholds. For oral medications, mean adherence \<86% in a 2-week period will trigger an alert. For SC medications, an alert will be generated if a dose is 10 days late for administration. A PRO 2 score for UC or CD of 2 or more will trigger an alert. If alerts are triggered for non-adherence, a clinical nurse, pharmacist, or social worker will contact the participant to identify barriers to adherence; remediation will be initiated if possible. The primary outcome of the proposed study will be the difference in mean medication possession ratio (MPR) between the intervention and control group during the 12-month study. Secondary outcomes will include self-reported adherence (MARS-5), clinical response and remission (Harvey Bradshaw Index for CD and partial Mayo score of UC), steroid-free response and remission, PROMIS measures of Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Pain Interference, Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life, self-efficacy (IBD Self-Efficacy Scale), new steroid use, and health care utilization (urgent care or emergency room visit, unplanned office visit, hospitalization, and/or surgery). Assuming 2 intervention participants for every 1 control with an adherence rate among controls of 0.65 and 0.9 in intervention participations with a Type 1 error rate of 0.05 and power of 0.9, we will need to enroll 82 intervention participants and 41 controls (n=123). All analyses will be completed using intention to treat principles. For categorical variables, the groups will be compared using the Chi Square test (Fisher's Exact if not normally distributed). For continuous variables, the groups will be compared using t tests (Wilcoxon signed rank if not normally distributed). We will also build logistic and linear regression models to adjust for confounding variable for the outcomes of interest. Possible confounding variables include but are not limited to route of administration, gender, insurance type, disease type, age, concurrent psychiatric disease, smoking, and concurrent steroid and/or narcotic use.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALRemote monitoring

See prior description of the intervention.

Sponsors

University of Maryland, Baltimore
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
CollaboratorOTHER
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
New York University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Cincinnati
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

It will not be possible to blind participants to their respective group assignment. However, to minimize bias, we will collect all outcome data electronically by study staff at the Data Management Center at the University of North Carolina masked to the group assignment.

Intervention model description

Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. At least 18 years of age or older 2. Have documented IBD based on usual diagnostic criteria including clinical symptoms and findings from endoscopy, radiology studies, and histology 3. Initiating treatment with a new oral or subcutaneous treatment for IBD 4. Have access to a mobile smartphone (iPhone 7 or later; Android release date 2012 or later) with reliable data and/or Wi-Fi access 5. Ability to understand the protocol and provide informed consent in English

Exclusion criteria

1. Inability to speak and read English 2. Inability to comply with the study protocol 3. Presence of an ileostomy, colostomy, ileoanal pouch anastomosis, or ileorectal anastomosis 4. Patients initiating oral corticosteroids only (without concurrent use of an oral or subcutaneous maintenance therapy) 5. Imminent surgery (within the next 60 days) 6. History of short bowel syndrome 7. Uncontrolled medical or psychiatric disease at the opinion of the investigator 1. Degenerative neurologic condition 2. Unstable angina 3. Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease 4. Malignancy within the last 2 years (excluding squamous or basal cell cancers of the skin) 5. Poorly controlled depression, mania, and schizophrenia 6. Serious active infection requiring antimicrobial therapy (excluding CD patients with perianal CD on antibiotics)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Medication adherence1 yearMedication possession ratio
Self-reported medication adherence1 yearMARS-5, scores from 5 to 25 with higher scores indicated greater adherence

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Healthcare utilization1 yearRates of healthcare utilization including office and ER visits, hospitalizations, and diagnostic testing
IBD Disease activity1 yearHarvey Bradshaw Index ( for participants with Crohn's disease only), minimum score 0, no maximum score, higher scores indicated greater disease activity
IBD Disease activity (objective)1 yearC reactive protein, minimum value 0, no maximum value, higher values indicate greater disease activity
Patient Reported Outcomes, Quality of Life1 yearPROMIS Global Health, T scores from 0-100, 50 is the population mean, higher scores indicate better quality of life
Self-efficacy1 yearIBD Self-efficacy scale, scores range from 29-290 with higher scores indicated greater self-efficacy
IBD Disease Activity1 yearSimple clinical colitis activity index (participants with ulcerative colitis only), minimum score 0, maximum score 19, higher scores indicate greater disease activity
IBD Disease Activity (objective)1 yearFecal calprotectin, minimum value 0, no maximum value, higher values indicate greater disease activity
Patient Reported Outcome (Pain interference)1 yearPROMIS Pain Interference, T scores from 0-100, 50 is the population mean, higher scores indicate more pain
Patient Reported Outcome (Anxiety)1 YearPROMIS Anxiety, T scores from 0-100, 50 is the population mean, higher scores indicate more anxiety
Patient Reported Outcome (Depression)1 yearPROMIS Depression, T scores from 0-100, 50 is the population mean, higher scores indicate more depression
Patient Reported Outcome (Fatigue)1 yearPROMIS Fatigue, T scores from 0-100, 50 is the population mean, higher scores indicate more fatigue
Patient Reported Outcome (Sleep Disturbance)1 yearPROMIS Sleep Disturbance, T scores from 0-100, 50 is the population mean, higher scores indicate more sleep disturbance

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 21, 2026