Skip to content

The Effectiveness of Graston Tecnique Compared to Traditional Physiotherapy to Improve Range of Motion After Arthroscopic Cuff Repair.

The Effectiveness of Graston Tecnique Compared to Traditional Physiotherapy to Improve Shoulder Range of Motion After Arthroscopic Cuff Repair.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05315440
Acronym
GRA-RCR
Enrollment
41
Registered
2022-04-07
Start date
2020-11-12
Completion date
2025-02-21
Last updated
2025-07-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cuff Tear Arthropathy

Keywords

shoulder rehabilitation, range of motion, rotator cuff repair, instrument assisted soft tissue mobilitation

Brief summary

In shoulder rehabilitation after arthroscopic cuff repair, one of first objectives coincides with improving the range of passive movement: this process often requires considerable time of both patients and physiotherapists. This study aims to verify whether it is useful to add instruments assisted soft-tissue mobilization according to Graston Tecnique to the classic rehabilitation protocol in order to accelerate recovery times of passive range of motion.

Detailed description

There is conflicting evidence about early versus delayed postoperative rehabilitation after arthroscopic cuff repair: early protocol seems to reduce the risk of stiffness but could increase the risk of rupture of the tendon in long time, especially for large tears; delayed protocol impose a period of shoulder immobilization (from 2 weeks to 40-day) that can promote tendons healing but could determine shoulder stiffness. Our research question is if after the delayed protocol used in our institute (40 -day immobilization period) it migh be useful to add soft-tissue mobilization assisted by instruments according to Graston Tecnique to the classic rehabilitation protocol of the shoulder in order to speed up recovery times of the passive movement range.

Interventions

OTHERgraston tecnique

Graston technique involves the use of steel tools that are used non-invasively on the skin to identify and treat areas that have stiffness or inflammation. These areas can be located with greater precision than the manual technique precisely because the instruments do not compress in contact with the patient's skin, as is the case with the physiotherapist's fingertips. Thanks to the instruments it is therefore possible to detect the areas of altered consistency and to treat them by pressing a minimum pressure.

OTHERConventional rehabilitation

30 minutes of passive and active assisted mobilization guided by the therapist, 30 min of Continous passive movement in flexion and abduction and 30 minutes of electrostimulation.

Sponsors

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

outcome assessor doesn't know allocation concealment

Intervention model description

randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* arthroscopic rotator cuff repair * partial lesion due to tendon degeneration (1 or 2 anchors reparation)

Exclusion criteria

* traumatic tendon lesions * associated conditions as arthritis, loss of superficial sensitivity, loss of muscle tone, mental impairment, oncological conditions * shoulder stiffness before surgery due to calcific tendonitis, adhesive capsulitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Passive Range of Motion Recovery of the Shoulderafter 2 weeks of treatmentPassive Range of Motion Recovery of the Shoulder in elevation and abduction measured by digital inclinometer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction of pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)after 2 weeks of treatmentThe visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst pain).
Shoulder function improvement measured by Constant Murley and Dash scalesafter 2 weeks of treatmentThe Constant-Murley score is a 100-points scale composed of a number of individual parameters that define the level of pain and the ability to carry out the normal daily activities of the patient. The test is divided into 4 subscales: pain (15 points), activities of daily living (20 points), strength (25 points) and range of motion (40 points). The higher the score, the higher the quality of the function. Since the test is carried out in an acute post-surgery phase, it is not possible to carry out the evaluation of strength, which is assigned a score of zero for all patients. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a 30-item questionnaire that looks at the ability of a patient to perform certain upper extremity activities. This questionnaire is a self-report questionnaire that patients can rate difficulty and interference with daily life on a 5 point Likert scale.The score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026