Skip to content

Which Trocar Access Site Should We Use in Laparoscopic Appendectomy?

Which Trocar Access Site Should We Use in Laparoscopic Appendectomy?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05311995
Enrollment
140
Registered
2022-04-05
Start date
2021-02-01
Completion date
2022-02-20
Last updated
2022-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

Laparoscopy, Minimally invasive surgery, appendicitis, colorectal

Brief summary

Open appendectomy has been used in the treatment of appendicitis, which is among the most common emergency pathologies worldwide, since the end of the 19th century. In the 20th century, laparoscopic appendectomy came to the fore and the frequency of use increased gradually. Despite the frequency of laparoscopic appendectomy, there is no consensus on the best way to perform each procedural step. One of these steps is the trocar entry areas. In this study, investigator's aim is to compare the trocar entry areas, which are various reports in the literature, and to find the localization with the optimal usage area. 140 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy between 2021-2022 were randomized into four groups and included in the study. Demographic data, peroperative findings, complications, length of stay and post-operative VAS values of the patients were evaluated.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOnly different trocar sites

Only different trocar sites in literature

Sponsors

Inonu University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Four trocar tecnıques groups in literature

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy

Exclusion criteria

patients who underwent open surgery and did not want to be involved in the study process

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Intensity measure1 yearself reported pain intensity morning. item is scored 0-10 ( 0: no pain- 10: pain as bad as

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026