Skip to content

Analysis of the Relevance of Radiologic Parameters on the Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy

Evaluation of Prognostic Radiological Parameters on the Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy, a Cross-sectional Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05310240
Enrollment
810
Registered
2022-04-04
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2023-02-01
Last updated
2023-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Femoro-acetabular Impingement, Hip Disease, Hip Impingement Syndrome

Keywords

magnetic resonance arthrography, hip arthroscopy

Brief summary

Joint-preserving surgery with arthroscopic techniques of the hip follows detailed radiological assessment including plain radiography of the hips and magnetic resonance arthrography (MRI). The purpose of this study was to compare features on radiography and MRI of the hip before surgery and assess their prognostic value on the outcome after surgery.

Detailed description

Hip arthroscopy is indicated for the treatment of a variety of pathologies of the hip, in patients without osteoarthritis. The diagnosis in patients with pain at the hip is made after history taking, clinical examination and radiological evaluation with plain radiography in a standardized technique and a magnetic resonance arthrography of the hip. The main indications for hip arthroscopy include CAM-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) necessitating bony decompression and chondro-labral tears necessitating arthroscopic repair or debridement. The purpose of this radiological non-interventional outcome study was to assess features on plain radiography and MRI in favor of good outcome after hip arthroscopy. This department performed 810 hip arthroscopies in the years of 2013 till 2021. All of those patients underwent standardized radiological evaluation with radiography and MRI. Radiographical parameters are assessed by a resident with experience in musculo-sceletal radiology, intra- and inter-observer reliability has been assessed for each parameter. All arthroscopies have been performed by two experience senior orthopedic surgeons. Ethical board approval has been obtained to follow-up on those patients. Follow-up includes the patient-reported outcome assessment using the iHOT12 score and the modified Harris hip score. The clinical end-point is the time till total hip arthroplasty (THA), a registry analysis of the Tyrolean Arthroplasty registry (TAR) has been performed. Statistical analysis is performed using ANOVA and Fishers T-Tests, the level of significance is .05.

Interventions

PROCEDUREHip arthroscopy

Arthroscopic surgery of the hip

Sponsors

Bezirkskrankenhaus St. Johann in Tirol
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Hip arthroscopy from 2013-2021 at this department.

Exclusion criteria

* Age below 18 years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
prosthetic-free survivalThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearThe number of days between hip arthroscopy and total hip arthroplasty. This parameter is assessed with the help of a joint-replacement registry for all subjects.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
iHOT12 ScoreThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearPatient reported outcome measurement with validation for patients after hip arthroscopy
modified Harris-Hip scoreThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearPatient reported outcome measurement with validation for failure of joint-preserving procedures

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026