Alzheimer's Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
The primary objective of this study is to verify the clinical benefit of monthly doses of aducanumab in slowing cognitive and functional impairment as measured by changes in the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) score as compared with placebo in participants with early Alzheimer's disease.
Interventions
Administered as specified in the treatment arm.
Administered as specified in the treatment arm.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria: * The participant must have confirmed amyloid beta pathology by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or amyloid PET * Must have a history of subjective memory decline with gradual onset and slow progression over the 6 months before Screening, confirmed by study partner * The participant must have 1 informant/care partner who, in the Investigator's opinion, has frequent and sufficient contact with the participant (at least 10 hours/week in person or by phone) as to be able to provide accurate information about the participant's cognitive and functional abilities over time * Must meet all of the following clinical criteria for MCI due to Alzheimer's disease or mild Alzheimer's disease according to National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) criteria 1. Have an MMSE score between 22 and 30 inclusive 2. Have a CDR memory score \>0.5 3. Have a Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Global Score (CDR-GS) of 0.5 or 1.0 4. Have a Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) score of 85 or lower indicative of objective cognitive impairment * Apart from a clinical diagnosis of early Alzheimer's disease, the participant must be in good health as determined by the Investigator based on medical history and screening assessments * Must consent to apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotyping. (Note: Participants are not required to be ApoE ε4 carriers) Key
Exclusion criteria
* Any uncontrolled medical or neurological/neurodegenerative condition (other than Alzheimer's disease) that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might be a contributing cause of the participant's cognitive impairment * Clinically significant and/or unstable psychiatric illness within 6 months prior to Screening * Transient ischemic attack or stroke or any unexplained loss of consciousness within 1 year prior to Screening * History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions or of hypersensitivity to any of the inactive ingredients in the drug product * Participation in any study with purported disease-modifying effect in Alzheimer's disease within 12 months prior to Screening unless documentation of receipt of placebo is available * Current use or previous use of medications with a purported disease-modifying effect in Alzheimer's disease, outside of investigational studies * Use of any medications that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may contribute to cognitive impairment, put the participant at higher risk for AEs, or impair the participant's ability to perform cognitive testing or complete study procedures * Use of any investigational drug * Prior exposure to aducanumab either commercially or by participation in a previous study with aducanumab. (Participants are eligible if they did not receive active aducanumab.) * A negative PET scan result with any amyloid-targeting ligand within 12 months prior to Screening NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Week 78 | Baseline, Week 78 | The Clinical Dementia Rate Scale integrates assessments from 3 domains of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment/problem-solving) and 3 domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, personal care). Following the caregiver interview and systematic participant examination, the rater assigns a score describing the participant's current performance level in each of these domains of life functioning. The Sum of boxes scoring methodology sums the score for each of the 6 domains and provides a value ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater impairment. A positive change from baseline indicates greater impairment. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study for Activities of Daily Living in Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106 | The ADCS-ADL-MCI scale consists of 17 instrumental items (e.g., shopping, preparing meals, using household appliances, etc) and 1 basic item (getting dressed). Ratings reflect caregiver observations about the participant's actual functioning over the previous month and provide an assessment of change in the functional state of the participant over time. The total score ranges from 0 to 53. Higher scores indicate greater independent, healthy functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates healthy functioning while a negative change from baseline indicates a decline in independent functioning. |
| Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) at Weeks 78 and 106 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106 | ADAS-Cog13 comprises both cognitive tasks and clinical ratings of cognitive performance. The cognitive subscale items capture word recall, ability to follow commands, the ability to correctly copy or draw an image, naming, the ability to interact with everyday objects, orientation, word recognition, memory, comprehension of spoken language, word-finding, and language ability, with a measure for delayed word recall and concentration/distractibility. The total score ranges from 0 to 85. Higher scores indicate worse performance. A positive change from baseline indicates decline in cognitive performance. |
| Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106 | The MMSE scale is a performance-based test of global cognitive status. It consists of 11 tasks that assess orientation, word recall, attention and calculation, language abilities, and visuospatial functions. The scores from the 11 tests are combined to obtain the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better performance. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in cognitive performance. |
| Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106 | The NPI-10 is a questionnaire administered to the informant, designed to obtain information on the presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms and behaviors in a participant with Alzheimer's disease. Ten areas are assessed: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability and aberrant motor behavior. The NPI total score ranges from 0 to 120. Higher scores indicate greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement (symptom reduction). |
| Change From Baseline in Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106 | The iADRS composite captures a decline in both cognition and daily function. It is a simple linear combination of the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale, cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog13), and the Alzheimer's disease cooperative study scale for activities of daily living in mild cognitive impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI). The ADAS-Cog13 scale ranges from 0 to 85 (higher scores indicate worse performance) and the ADCS-ADL-MCI scale ranges from 0 to 53 (higher scores indicate greater independent, healthy functioning). The total score for iADRS scale ranges from 0 to 138, where higher scores indicate better performance. |
| Change From Baseline in Tau PET Signal at Weeks 78 and 104 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 104 | The cerebral tau level was measured by tau PET imaging. Tau PET imaging was conducted using radiotracer. SUVR is a ratio of PET uptake measured in brain region of interest and a disease-free reference region. A higher SUVR is an indication of increased PET radiotracer uptake and worsening disease. |
| Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score at Week 106 | Baseline, Week 106 | The CDR integrates assessments from 3 domains of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment/problem-solving) and 3 domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, personal care). Following caregiver interview and systematic participant examination, the rater assigns a score describing the participant's current performance level in each of these domains of life functioning. The CDR-SB sums the score for each of the 6 domains and provides a value ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater impairment. Positive change from baseline indicates greater impairment. |
| Change From Baseline in Global Statistical Test (GST) Composite Z-Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106 | GST z-score is an average of z-scores of CDR-SB, ADASCog13 and ADCS-ADL-MCI. CDR-SB assesses 3 cognitive (memory,orientation, judgment/problem-solving)and 3 functional(community affairs,home/hobbies,personal care) domains. Sum of Boxes method combines scores across 6 domains, ranging from 0-18(higher scores=greater impairment). ADAS-Cog13 evaluates cognitive tasks like word recall, naming, orientation and memory, with scores from 0-85 (higher scores=worse performance). ADCS-ADL-MCI rates 17 tasks (e.g.,shopping, preparing meal) and 1 basic task(dressing) with scores from 0-53 (higher scores=greater independence/healthy functioning). z-score\>0 indicates greater impairment/worse performance for CDR-SB and ADASCog13 scales and improved functioning for ADCS-ADL-MCI. For ADCS-ADL-MCI, z-score were reversed (new reversed value=original value-1) to make interpretation consistent. The GST z-score of 0 indicates population mean and score\>0 indicate greater impairment/worse performance. |
| Change From Baseline in Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Signal at Weeks 78 and 104 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 104 | Amyloid PET scan assesses cerebral amyloid load using radiotracers which is standardized into centiloids. Centiloid values on centiloid scale is based on mean composite standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR). |
Countries
Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants took part in the study at the investigative sites in Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, and United States from 02 Jun 2022 to 12 Aug 2024.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 1027 participants with Alzheimer's Disease (AD) were enrolled and randomized in this study. Of these, 1024 participants were dosed to receive placebo or aducanumab. None of the participants completed the study due to early termination of the study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Participants received placebo, Q4W, administered as an IV infusion. | 344 |
| Aducanumab Participants received aducanumab, up to 10 mg/kg of body weight, Q4W, administered as an IV infusion. | 680 |
| Total | 1,024 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 4 | 31 |
| Overall Study | Death | 0 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Failure to Meet Continuation Criteria | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Failure to Meet Randomization Criteria | 1 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy - Based on Participant Perception | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Deviation | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Randomized by Mistake | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Reason Not Specified | 1 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Site Terminated by Sponsor | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Study Terminated by Sponsor | 282 | 559 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Participant - Concern About Study Procedures/Perceived Risks | 2 | 6 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Participant - Desire for Change in Treatment (Unrelated to Safety/Efficacy) | 8 | 17 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Participant - Other | 25 | 30 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Participant Relocation (Moving or Has Moved) | 1 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Participant - Study Visit Burden/Scheduling Conflicts | 14 | 17 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Placebo | Aducanumab |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 72.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.93 | 72.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.18 | 72.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.81 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity Hispanic or Latino | 78 Participants | 27 Participants | 51 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity Not Hispanic or Latino | 878 Participants | 293 Participants | 585 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity Not Reported Due to Confidentiality Regulations | 67 Participants | 24 Participants | 43 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity Unknown | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Asian | 112 Participants | 39 Participants | 73 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Black or African American | 12 Participants | 3 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Multiple: American Indian or Alaska Native and White | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Not Reported Due to Confidentiality Regulations | 83 Participants | 26 Participants | 57 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Other | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Unknown | 5 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race White | 806 Participants | 273 Participants | 533 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 540 Participants | 187 Participants | 353 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 484 Participants | 157 Participants | 327 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 343 | 3 / 681 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 127 / 343 | 359 / 681 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 23 / 343 | 59 / 681 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Week 78
The Clinical Dementia Rate Scale integrates assessments from 3 domains of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment/problem-solving) and 3 domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, personal care). Following the caregiver interview and systematic participant examination, the rater assigns a score describing the participant's current performance level in each of these domains of life functioning. The Sum of boxes scoring methodology sums the score for each of the 6 domains and provides a value ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater impairment. A positive change from baseline indicates greater impairment.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 78
Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Week 78 | 0.67 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.408 |
| Aducanumab | Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Week 78 | 1.56 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.635 |
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) at Weeks 78 and 106
ADAS-Cog13 comprises both cognitive tasks and clinical ratings of cognitive performance. The cognitive subscale items capture word recall, ability to follow commands, the ability to correctly copy or draw an image, naming, the ability to interact with everyday objects, orientation, word recognition, memory, comprehension of spoken language, word-finding, and language ability, with a measure for delayed word recall and concentration/distractibility. The total score ranges from 0 to 85. Higher scores indicate worse performance. A positive change from baseline indicates decline in cognitive performance.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106
Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Assessment was also planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) at Weeks 78 and 106 | 9.667 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8844 |
| Aducanumab | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) at Weeks 78 and 106 | 7.396 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3262 |
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study for Activities of Daily Living in Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106
The ADCS-ADL-MCI scale consists of 17 instrumental items (e.g., shopping, preparing meals, using household appliances, etc) and 1 basic item (getting dressed). Ratings reflect caregiver observations about the participant's actual functioning over the previous month and provide an assessment of change in the functional state of the participant over time. The total score ranges from 0 to 53. Higher scores indicate greater independent, healthy functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates healthy functioning while a negative change from baseline indicates a decline in independent functioning.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106
Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Assessment was also planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study for Activities of Daily Living in Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | -5.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.61 |
| Aducanumab | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study for Activities of Daily Living in Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | -0.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.6 |
Change From Baseline in Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Signal at Weeks 78 and 104
Amyloid PET scan assesses cerebral amyloid load using radiotracers which is standardized into centiloids. Centiloid values on centiloid scale is based on mean composite standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR).
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 78 and 104
Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Due to the decision of early termination, only one participant had an amyloid scan at week 78 and data was reported below. In addition, the assessment planned for Week 104 was not performed due to early termination.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Aducanumab | Change From Baseline in Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Signal at Weeks 78 and 104 | -2.360 SUVR |
Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score at Week 106
The CDR integrates assessments from 3 domains of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment/problem-solving) and 3 domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, personal care). Following caregiver interview and systematic participant examination, the rater assigns a score describing the participant's current performance level in each of these domains of life functioning. The CDR-SB sums the score for each of the 6 domains and provides a value ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater impairment. Positive change from baseline indicates greater impairment.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 106
Population: Assessment was planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination.
Change From Baseline in Global Statistical Test (GST) Composite Z-Score at Weeks 78 and 106
GST z-score is an average of z-scores of CDR-SB, ADASCog13 and ADCS-ADL-MCI. CDR-SB assesses 3 cognitive (memory,orientation, judgment/problem-solving)and 3 functional(community affairs,home/hobbies,personal care) domains. Sum of Boxes method combines scores across 6 domains, ranging from 0-18(higher scores=greater impairment). ADAS-Cog13 evaluates cognitive tasks like word recall, naming, orientation and memory, with scores from 0-85 (higher scores=worse performance). ADCS-ADL-MCI rates 17 tasks (e.g.,shopping, preparing meal) and 1 basic task(dressing) with scores from 0-53 (higher scores=greater independence/healthy functioning). z-score\>0 indicates greater impairment/worse performance for CDR-SB and ADASCog13 scales and improved functioning for ADCS-ADL-MCI. For ADCS-ADL-MCI, z-score were reversed (new reversed value=original value-1) to make interpretation consistent. The GST z-score of 0 indicates population mean and score\>0 indicate greater impairment/worse performance.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106
Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Assessment was also planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Global Statistical Test (GST) Composite Z-Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | 0.88 z-score | Standard Deviation 0.116 |
| Aducanumab | Change From Baseline in Global Statistical Test (GST) Composite Z-Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | 0.48 z-score | Standard Deviation 0.515 |
Change From Baseline in Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) Score at Weeks 78 and 106
The iADRS composite captures a decline in both cognition and daily function. It is a simple linear combination of the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale, cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog13), and the Alzheimer's disease cooperative study scale for activities of daily living in mild cognitive impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI). The ADAS-Cog13 scale ranges from 0 to 85 (higher scores indicate worse performance) and the ADCS-ADL-MCI scale ranges from 0 to 53 (higher scores indicate greater independent, healthy functioning). The total score for iADRS scale ranges from 0 to 138, where higher scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106
Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Assessment was also planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | -14.667 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4869 |
| Aducanumab | Change From Baseline in Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | -7.796 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.7805 |
Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106
The MMSE scale is a performance-based test of global cognitive status. It consists of 11 tasks that assess orientation, word recall, attention and calculation, language abilities, and visuospatial functions. The scores from the 11 tests are combined to obtain the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better performance. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in cognitive performance.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106
Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Assessment was also planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | -6.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Aducanumab | Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | -1.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.48 |
Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Score at Weeks 78 and 106
The NPI-10 is a questionnaire administered to the informant, designed to obtain information on the presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms and behaviors in a participant with Alzheimer's disease. Ten areas are assessed: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability and aberrant motor behavior. The NPI total score ranges from 0 to 120. Higher scores indicate greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement (symptom reduction).
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106
Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Assessment was also planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | -8.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.2 |
| Aducanumab | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | -1.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.94 |
Change From Baseline in Tau PET Signal at Weeks 78 and 104
The cerebral tau level was measured by tau PET imaging. Tau PET imaging was conducted using radiotracer. SUVR is a ratio of PET uptake measured in brain region of interest and a disease-free reference region. A higher SUVR is an indication of increased PET radiotracer uptake and worsening disease.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 78 and 104
Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Due to decision of early termination, the Tau PET scan was not performed in any participant at scheduled visits of Weeks 78 and 104.