Skip to content

A Study to Verify the Clinical Benefit of Aducanumab in Participants With Early Alzheimer's Disease

A Phase 3b/4 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Verify the Clinical Benefit of Aducanumab (BIIB037) in Participants With Alzheimer's Disease

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05310071
Acronym
ENVISION
Enrollment
1027
Registered
2022-04-04
Start date
2022-06-02
Completion date
2024-08-12
Last updated
2025-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer's Disease

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to verify the clinical benefit of monthly doses of aducanumab in slowing cognitive and functional impairment as measured by changes in the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) score as compared with placebo in participants with early Alzheimer's disease.

Interventions

Administered as specified in the treatment arm.

DRUGPlacebo

Administered as specified in the treatment arm.

Sponsors

Biogen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * The participant must have confirmed amyloid beta pathology by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or amyloid PET * Must have a history of subjective memory decline with gradual onset and slow progression over the 6 months before Screening, confirmed by study partner * The participant must have 1 informant/care partner who, in the Investigator's opinion, has frequent and sufficient contact with the participant (at least 10 hours/week in person or by phone) as to be able to provide accurate information about the participant's cognitive and functional abilities over time * Must meet all of the following clinical criteria for MCI due to Alzheimer's disease or mild Alzheimer's disease according to National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) criteria 1. Have an MMSE score between 22 and 30 inclusive 2. Have a CDR memory score \>0.5 3. Have a Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Global Score (CDR-GS) of 0.5 or 1.0 4. Have a Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) score of 85 or lower indicative of objective cognitive impairment * Apart from a clinical diagnosis of early Alzheimer's disease, the participant must be in good health as determined by the Investigator based on medical history and screening assessments * Must consent to apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotyping. (Note: Participants are not required to be ApoE ε4 carriers) Key

Exclusion criteria

* Any uncontrolled medical or neurological/neurodegenerative condition (other than Alzheimer's disease) that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might be a contributing cause of the participant's cognitive impairment * Clinically significant and/or unstable psychiatric illness within 6 months prior to Screening * Transient ischemic attack or stroke or any unexplained loss of consciousness within 1 year prior to Screening * History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions or of hypersensitivity to any of the inactive ingredients in the drug product * Participation in any study with purported disease-modifying effect in Alzheimer's disease within 12 months prior to Screening unless documentation of receipt of placebo is available * Current use or previous use of medications with a purported disease-modifying effect in Alzheimer's disease, outside of investigational studies * Use of any medications that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may contribute to cognitive impairment, put the participant at higher risk for AEs, or impair the participant's ability to perform cognitive testing or complete study procedures * Use of any investigational drug * Prior exposure to aducanumab either commercially or by participation in a previous study with aducanumab. (Participants are eligible if they did not receive active aducanumab.) * A negative PET scan result with any amyloid-targeting ligand within 12 months prior to Screening NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Week 78Baseline, Week 78The Clinical Dementia Rate Scale integrates assessments from 3 domains of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment/problem-solving) and 3 domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, personal care). Following the caregiver interview and systematic participant examination, the rater assigns a score describing the participant's current performance level in each of these domains of life functioning. The Sum of boxes scoring methodology sums the score for each of the 6 domains and provides a value ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater impairment. A positive change from baseline indicates greater impairment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study for Activities of Daily Living in Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106The ADCS-ADL-MCI scale consists of 17 instrumental items (e.g., shopping, preparing meals, using household appliances, etc) and 1 basic item (getting dressed). Ratings reflect caregiver observations about the participant's actual functioning over the previous month and provide an assessment of change in the functional state of the participant over time. The total score ranges from 0 to 53. Higher scores indicate greater independent, healthy functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates healthy functioning while a negative change from baseline indicates a decline in independent functioning.
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) at Weeks 78 and 106Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106ADAS-Cog13 comprises both cognitive tasks and clinical ratings of cognitive performance. The cognitive subscale items capture word recall, ability to follow commands, the ability to correctly copy or draw an image, naming, the ability to interact with everyday objects, orientation, word recognition, memory, comprehension of spoken language, word-finding, and language ability, with a measure for delayed word recall and concentration/distractibility. The total score ranges from 0 to 85. Higher scores indicate worse performance. A positive change from baseline indicates decline in cognitive performance.
Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106The MMSE scale is a performance-based test of global cognitive status. It consists of 11 tasks that assess orientation, word recall, attention and calculation, language abilities, and visuospatial functions. The scores from the 11 tests are combined to obtain the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better performance. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in cognitive performance.
Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Score at Weeks 78 and 106Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106The NPI-10 is a questionnaire administered to the informant, designed to obtain information on the presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms and behaviors in a participant with Alzheimer's disease. Ten areas are assessed: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability and aberrant motor behavior. The NPI total score ranges from 0 to 120. Higher scores indicate greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement (symptom reduction).
Change From Baseline in Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) Score at Weeks 78 and 106Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106The iADRS composite captures a decline in both cognition and daily function. It is a simple linear combination of the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale, cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog13), and the Alzheimer's disease cooperative study scale for activities of daily living in mild cognitive impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI). The ADAS-Cog13 scale ranges from 0 to 85 (higher scores indicate worse performance) and the ADCS-ADL-MCI scale ranges from 0 to 53 (higher scores indicate greater independent, healthy functioning). The total score for iADRS scale ranges from 0 to 138, where higher scores indicate better performance.
Change From Baseline in Tau PET Signal at Weeks 78 and 104Baseline, Weeks 78 and 104The cerebral tau level was measured by tau PET imaging. Tau PET imaging was conducted using radiotracer. SUVR is a ratio of PET uptake measured in brain region of interest and a disease-free reference region. A higher SUVR is an indication of increased PET radiotracer uptake and worsening disease.
Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score at Week 106Baseline, Week 106The CDR integrates assessments from 3 domains of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment/problem-solving) and 3 domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, personal care). Following caregiver interview and systematic participant examination, the rater assigns a score describing the participant's current performance level in each of these domains of life functioning. The CDR-SB sums the score for each of the 6 domains and provides a value ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater impairment. Positive change from baseline indicates greater impairment.
Change From Baseline in Global Statistical Test (GST) Composite Z-Score at Weeks 78 and 106Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106GST z-score is an average of z-scores of CDR-SB, ADASCog13 and ADCS-ADL-MCI. CDR-SB assesses 3 cognitive (memory,orientation, judgment/problem-solving)and 3 functional(community affairs,home/hobbies,personal care) domains. Sum of Boxes method combines scores across 6 domains, ranging from 0-18(higher scores=greater impairment). ADAS-Cog13 evaluates cognitive tasks like word recall, naming, orientation and memory, with scores from 0-85 (higher scores=worse performance). ADCS-ADL-MCI rates 17 tasks (e.g.,shopping, preparing meal) and 1 basic task(dressing) with scores from 0-53 (higher scores=greater independence/healthy functioning). z-score\>0 indicates greater impairment/worse performance for CDR-SB and ADASCog13 scales and improved functioning for ADCS-ADL-MCI. For ADCS-ADL-MCI, z-score were reversed (new reversed value=original value-1) to make interpretation consistent. The GST z-score of 0 indicates population mean and score\>0 indicate greater impairment/worse performance.
Change From Baseline in Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Signal at Weeks 78 and 104Baseline, Weeks 78 and 104Amyloid PET scan assesses cerebral amyloid load using radiotracers which is standardized into centiloids. Centiloid values on centiloid scale is based on mean composite standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR).

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at the investigative sites in Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, and United States from 02 Jun 2022 to 12 Aug 2024.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 1027 participants with Alzheimer's Disease (AD) were enrolled and randomized in this study. Of these, 1024 participants were dosed to receive placebo or aducanumab. None of the participants completed the study due to early termination of the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo, Q4W, administered as an IV infusion.
344
Aducanumab
Participants received aducanumab, up to 10 mg/kg of body weight, Q4W, administered as an IV infusion.
680
Total1,024

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event431
Overall StudyDeath03
Overall StudyFailure to Meet Continuation Criteria20
Overall StudyFailure to Meet Randomization Criteria12
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy - Based on Participant Perception02
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up24
Overall StudyProtocol Deviation20
Overall StudyRandomized by Mistake01
Overall StudyReason Not Specified13
Overall StudySite Terminated by Sponsor02
Overall StudyStudy Terminated by Sponsor282559
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Participant - Concern About Study Procedures/Perceived Risks26
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Participant - Desire for Change in Treatment (Unrelated to Safety/Efficacy)817
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Participant - Other2530
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Participant Relocation (Moving or Has Moved)13
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Participant - Study Visit Burden/Scheduling Conflicts1417

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboAducanumab
Age, Continuous72.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.93
72.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.18
72.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.81
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
78 Participants27 Participants51 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
878 Participants293 Participants585 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Not Reported Due to Confidentiality Regulations
67 Participants24 Participants43 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Unknown
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
112 Participants39 Participants73 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
12 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Multiple: American Indian or Alaska Native and White
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Not Reported Due to Confidentiality Regulations
83 Participants26 Participants57 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Unknown
5 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
806 Participants273 Participants533 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
540 Participants187 Participants353 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
484 Participants157 Participants327 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3433 / 681
other
Total, other adverse events
127 / 343359 / 681
serious
Total, serious adverse events
23 / 34359 / 681

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Week 78

The Clinical Dementia Rate Scale integrates assessments from 3 domains of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment/problem-solving) and 3 domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, personal care). Following the caregiver interview and systematic participant examination, the rater assigns a score describing the participant's current performance level in each of these domains of life functioning. The Sum of boxes scoring methodology sums the score for each of the 6 domains and provides a value ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater impairment. A positive change from baseline indicates greater impairment.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 78

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Week 780.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.408
AducanumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Week 781.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.635
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) at Weeks 78 and 106

ADAS-Cog13 comprises both cognitive tasks and clinical ratings of cognitive performance. The cognitive subscale items capture word recall, ability to follow commands, the ability to correctly copy or draw an image, naming, the ability to interact with everyday objects, orientation, word recognition, memory, comprehension of spoken language, word-finding, and language ability, with a measure for delayed word recall and concentration/distractibility. The total score ranges from 0 to 85. Higher scores indicate worse performance. A positive change from baseline indicates decline in cognitive performance.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Assessment was also planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) at Weeks 78 and 1069.667 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8844
AducanumabChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) at Weeks 78 and 1067.396 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3262
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study for Activities of Daily Living in Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106

The ADCS-ADL-MCI scale consists of 17 instrumental items (e.g., shopping, preparing meals, using household appliances, etc) and 1 basic item (getting dressed). Ratings reflect caregiver observations about the participant's actual functioning over the previous month and provide an assessment of change in the functional state of the participant over time. The total score ranges from 0 to 53. Higher scores indicate greater independent, healthy functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates healthy functioning while a negative change from baseline indicates a decline in independent functioning.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Assessment was also planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study for Activities of Daily Living in Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106-5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.61
AducanumabChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study for Activities of Daily Living in Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Signal at Weeks 78 and 104

Amyloid PET scan assesses cerebral amyloid load using radiotracers which is standardized into centiloids. Centiloid values on centiloid scale is based on mean composite standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 78 and 104

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Due to the decision of early termination, only one participant had an amyloid scan at week 78 and data was reported below. In addition, the assessment planned for Week 104 was not performed due to early termination.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
AducanumabChange From Baseline in Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Signal at Weeks 78 and 104-2.360 SUVR
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score at Week 106

The CDR integrates assessments from 3 domains of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment/problem-solving) and 3 domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, personal care). Following caregiver interview and systematic participant examination, the rater assigns a score describing the participant's current performance level in each of these domains of life functioning. The CDR-SB sums the score for each of the 6 domains and provides a value ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater impairment. Positive change from baseline indicates greater impairment.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 106

Population: Assessment was planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination.

Secondary

Change From Baseline in Global Statistical Test (GST) Composite Z-Score at Weeks 78 and 106

GST z-score is an average of z-scores of CDR-SB, ADASCog13 and ADCS-ADL-MCI. CDR-SB assesses 3 cognitive (memory,orientation, judgment/problem-solving)and 3 functional(community affairs,home/hobbies,personal care) domains. Sum of Boxes method combines scores across 6 domains, ranging from 0-18(higher scores=greater impairment). ADAS-Cog13 evaluates cognitive tasks like word recall, naming, orientation and memory, with scores from 0-85 (higher scores=worse performance). ADCS-ADL-MCI rates 17 tasks (e.g.,shopping, preparing meal) and 1 basic task(dressing) with scores from 0-53 (higher scores=greater independence/healthy functioning). z-score\>0 indicates greater impairment/worse performance for CDR-SB and ADASCog13 scales and improved functioning for ADCS-ADL-MCI. For ADCS-ADL-MCI, z-score were reversed (new reversed value=original value-1) to make interpretation consistent. The GST z-score of 0 indicates population mean and score\>0 indicate greater impairment/worse performance.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Assessment was also planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Global Statistical Test (GST) Composite Z-Score at Weeks 78 and 1060.88 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.116
AducanumabChange From Baseline in Global Statistical Test (GST) Composite Z-Score at Weeks 78 and 1060.48 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.515
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) Score at Weeks 78 and 106

The iADRS composite captures a decline in both cognition and daily function. It is a simple linear combination of the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale, cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog13), and the Alzheimer's disease cooperative study scale for activities of daily living in mild cognitive impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI). The ADAS-Cog13 scale ranges from 0 to 85 (higher scores indicate worse performance) and the ADCS-ADL-MCI scale ranges from 0 to 53 (higher scores indicate greater independent, healthy functioning). The total score for iADRS scale ranges from 0 to 138, where higher scores indicate better performance.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Assessment was also planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) Score at Weeks 78 and 106-14.667 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4869
AducanumabChange From Baseline in Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) Score at Weeks 78 and 106-7.796 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7805
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106

The MMSE scale is a performance-based test of global cognitive status. It consists of 11 tasks that assess orientation, word recall, attention and calculation, language abilities, and visuospatial functions. The scores from the 11 tests are combined to obtain the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better performance. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in cognitive performance.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Assessment was also planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106-6.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
AducanumabChange From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Score at Weeks 78 and 106

The NPI-10 is a questionnaire administered to the informant, designed to obtain information on the presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms and behaviors in a participant with Alzheimer's disease. Ten areas are assessed: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability and aberrant motor behavior. The NPI total score ranges from 0 to 120. Higher scores indicate greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement (symptom reduction).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Assessment was also planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Score at Weeks 78 and 106-8.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.2
AducanumabChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Score at Weeks 78 and 106-1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.94
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Tau PET Signal at Weeks 78 and 104

The cerebral tau level was measured by tau PET imaging. Tau PET imaging was conducted using radiotracer. SUVR is a ratio of PET uptake measured in brain region of interest and a disease-free reference region. A higher SUVR is an indication of increased PET radiotracer uptake and worsening disease.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 78 and 104

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Due to decision of early termination, the Tau PET scan was not performed in any participant at scheduled visits of Weeks 78 and 104.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026