Skip to content

Comparison Between the Efficacy of Residential and Ambulatory Weight Loss Programs for Pediatric Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Comparison Between the Efficacy of Residential and Ambulatory Weight Loss Programs for Pediatric Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05309863
Enrollment
850
Registered
2022-04-04
Start date
2022-05-01
Completion date
2031-12-31
Last updated
2024-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pediatric Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Keywords

NAFLD, Liver fibrosis, Lifestyle management, Multidisciplinary treatment

Brief summary

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the most prevalent chronic liver disease worldwide, paralleling the obesity pandemic. Secondary to increasing rates of obesity in children and adolescents, the prevalence of NAFLD has more than doubled in the last decades and is now the most common pediatric liver disease. At present, lifestyle modification by dietary intervention and increasing physical activity is the mainstay of treatment for pediatric NAFLD. Several studies have shown that lifestyle intervention and weight loss improve non-invasive markers of NAFLD. To the investigator's knowledge, data on fibrosis regression following lifestyle treatment in children and adolescents were lacking. The investigators therefore performed a prospective cohort study to investigate the impact of residential lifestyle treatment on liver steatosis and fibrosis in obese children and adolescents. As a follow-up, the investigators now aim to compare these findings with a cohort of well-characterized patients undergoing multidisciplinary, yet ambulatory, weight loss treatment. As such, the investigators will compare the outcomes in two prospective patient cohorts in this non-randomized observational study.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALLifestyle management

Increasing the level of physical activity, dietary intervention, acquiring healthy eating habits, and psychological support.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Ghent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Enrolled in the lifestyle management program for obesity in one of the participating centres

Exclusion criteria

* Syndromic obesity * Evidence of liver disease of other causes (viral, auto-immune, genetic) * Average daily alcohol consumption of \>20g/day * Unvalid screening Fibroscan * Treatment with drugs which can induce liver steatosis or fibrosis (e.g. systemic corticosteroids, methotrexate)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement of liver fibrosis6 months of lifestyle interventionLiver fibrosis will be quantified using Fibroscan, and patients will be divided into disease stages based on published cut-offs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement of liver fibrosis12 months of lifestyle interventionLiver fibrosis will be quantified using Fibroscan, and patients will be divided into disease stages based on published cut-offs.
Improvement of liver steatosis6 months of lifestyle interventionLiver steatosis will be quantified using controlled attenuation parameter on the Fibroscan
Resolution of liver steatosis6 months of lifestyle interventionLiver steatosis will be quantified using controlled attenuation parameter on the Fibroscan. Resolution of steatosis is identified as CAP \<248 dB/m at follow-up in patients with baseline CAP of 248 dB/m or higher.
Resolution of liver fibrosis6 months of lifestyle interventionLiver fibrosis will be quantified using Fibroscan. Resolution of fibrosis is identified as liver stiffness \<7.0 kPa at follow-up in patients with baseline liver stiffness of 7.0 kPa or higher.
Improvement in ALT6 months of lifestyle interventionProportion of patients with at least 30% decrease in serum ALT levels at follow-up, out of the patients with baseline elevated ALT

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Primary ContactRuth De Bruyne, MD, PhD
ruth.debruyne@uzgent.be003293322966

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026