Skip to content

Comparison of Hernia Sac Ligation Versus Invagination

Comparison of Hernia Sac Ligation Versus Invagination in Lichtenstein Tension Free Mesh Hernioplasty. Does Type of Hernia Have a Role on Outcomes?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05308251
Enrollment
108
Registered
2022-04-04
Start date
2020-01-01
Completion date
2022-03-01
Last updated
2022-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hernia, Inguinal, Postoperative Pain, Recurrence

Keywords

indirect hernia sac, ligation, invagination

Brief summary

Management of indirect hernial sac in inguinal hernia repairs has long been a subject of debate among general surgeons. Although hernial sac high ligation (HL) is a time-honored concept in groin hernia surgery, non-ligation/invagination is gaining more popularity. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of hernia sac ligation and invagination in patients with Lichtenstein mesh hernioplasty (LMH). Also, investigators aimed to investigate the possible association between the hernial defect size and postoperative early pain in both groups.

Interventions

PROCEDURELichtenstein Mesh Hernioplasty

The inguinal canal was opened and the hernia sac was dissected from the spermatic cord The deep inguinal ring was tightened with one or two polypropylene 2/0 sutures. The posterior wall of the inguinal canal was supported using the standard polypropylene mesh and fixed with 2/0 polyproline. The ilioinguinal nerve, iliohypogastric nerve, and genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve were preserved and care was taken to prevent entrapment.

Sponsors

Samsun Education and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* unilateral uncomplicated indirect hernia * elective operations * spinal anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* Bilateral hernias * recurrent cases * femoral-scrotal hernias * those who refused to give consent * those who were given general anesthesia besides spinal anesthesia * those who were repaired with a method other than Lichtenstein mesh hernioplasty

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative pain levelspostoperative period before discharge-1 year after discharge10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative complicationspostoperative period before discharge (mainly the first 24 hours)hematoma, seroma, wound infection, urinary retention
perioperative outcomespostoperative period before discharge (mainly the first 24 hours)operative time (minutes), hospital stay (days)
recurrencepostoperative 1 yearNumber of patients with hernia recurrence

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026