Skip to content

Integrating Enhanced HIV PrEP Into a STI Clinic in Lilongwe

Integrating Enhanced HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Into a Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic in Lilongwe

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05307991
Enrollment
249
Registered
2022-04-01
Start date
2022-03-09
Completion date
2023-08-01
Last updated
2023-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blood-Borne Infections, Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection, Communicable Disease, HIV Infections, Infections, Neisseria Gonorrheae Infection, RNA Virus Infections, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Bacterial, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral, Syphilis, Virus Disease

Keywords

Tenofovir, Pre-exposure prophylaxis, emtricitabine, assisted partner notification

Brief summary

This is a prospective cohort study evaluating acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of integrating HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) into a sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic alongside assisted partner notification and etiologic STI testing in Lilongwe, Malawi.

Interventions

DRUGPrEP

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (or PrEP) will include the Malawi-approved PrEP regimen at time of study enrollment. At time of submission, the only Malawi-approved regimen includes Tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) containing 300 mg of TDF and 200 mg of FTC. If additional PrEP regimens become available in Malawi during the study recruitment or follow-up, participants will be able to choose from any regimen that they are eligible to receive per Malawi PrEP guidelines.

Urine specimens will be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) using GeneXpert® (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) Xpert® CT/GC platform and cartridge and syphilis RPR titer (BD Macro-VUE™, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ \[FDA approved\]) with confirmatory Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TP-PA) (Serodia Fujirebio Inc, Malvern, PA \[CE mark\]) if RPR is positive.

BEHAVIORALAssisted partner notification

Participants will be asked to provide the name and locator information for all sexual partners in the preceding 6 months. Participants will be asked to refer sexual partners to the clinic and will be provided with cards to distribute to partners. Each card will request that the recipient report to the STI clinic with the card and will contain a linking number that links them back to the index participant. Sexual Partner Tracing: In accordance with the contract referral approach, if the named partners do not present to an STI clinic within 7-14 days, community outreach workers will contact the partners and counsel them to visit the clinic. Contact may be made through telephone, text message, or in person, as needed and will not disclose the name or identify of the index patient.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTAcute HIV testing

Persons initiating or re-initiating PrEP will also be screened for acute HIV infection (AHI) using Abbott RealTime HIV-1 Assay (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) or Xpert® HIV-1 Viral Load (GeneXpert, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA).

Sponsors

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Patient Participant Inclusion Criteria: * ≥15 years of age. * Eligible for PrEP according to Malawi PrEP guidelines (see below) * Presenting for care at STI clinic (primary presentation or referral from partner based on STI or HIV exposure) * Able to consent for study participation and willing to provide locator information for follow-up tracing \*Malawi PrEP eligibility criteria: * Age ≥15 years * HIV seronegative iii. At substantial risk for HIV, with prioritization of persons who: * Buy or sell sex; Key population (female sex worker, men who have sex with other men, transgendered persons; Vulnerable population included adolescent girls and young women aged 15-24; STI clients; Serodiscordant couples including HIV-negative women who are pregnant or breast feeding or HIV-negative men or women for whom their HIV-infected partner is: not on ART, on ART \<6 months, has an unsuppressed or high viral load, or is non-adherent to ART, iv. Have ruled out acute HIV infection, or defer PrEP initiation for anyone with signs or symptoms consistent with acute HIV infection, v. Willingness to attend scheduled PrEP visits, vi. No contraindication to use of TDF and 3TC, vii. Bodyweight ≥30 kg, viii. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60mL/min, ix. No known renal diseases, x. No diabetes mellitus.

Exclusion criteria

* Current imprisonment or incarceration in a medical or psychiatric facility Provider Participant: Inclusion Criteria: * ≥18 years of age. * Duties relevant to integration or provision of PrEP and/or aPN at STI clinic

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of participants retained on PrEPApproximately 6 months after enrollmentExamine the proportion of participants who initiate PrEP at enrollment who are retained on PrEP through study completion (6 months)
Number of participants retained on PrEPApproximately 6 months after enrollmentExamine the number of participants who initiate PrEP at enrollment who are retained on PrEP through study completion (6 months)
Number of provider participants describing feasibility of aPN and STI testing (qualitative)Approximately 6 months after the start of enrollmentTo gain deeper insights about the feasibility of enhanced PrEP delivery, PrEP providers from the study site will be asked to participate in in-depth interviews. Participating providers are involved in different aspects of PrEP provision, aPN, and STI testing and include study staff members. Feasibility is defined as a positive rating about the intervention's potential performance in real-life conditions at the clinic and community levels.
Number of provider participants describing feasibility of aPN and STI testing (quantitative)Approximately 6 months after the start of enrollmentTo gain deeper insights about the feasibility of enhanced PrEP delivery, PrEP providers from the study site will be asked to complete survey using modified validated measures assessing feasibility on a 5-point Likert scale. Participating providers are involved in different aspects of PrEP provision, aPN, and STI testing and include study staff members.
Number of provider participants describing acceptability of aPN and STI testing (quantitative)Approximately 6 months after the start of enrollmentTo gain deeper insights about the acceptability of enhanced PrEP delivery, PrEP providers from the study site will be asked to complete survey using modified validated measures assessing feasibility on a 5-point Likert scale. Participating providers are involved in different aspects of PrEP provision, aPN, and STI testing and include study staff members.
Number of provider participants describing acceptability of aPN and STI testing (qualitative)Approximately 6 months after the start of enrollmentTo gain deeper insights about the acceptability of enhanced PrEP delivery, PrEP providers from the study site will be asked to participate in in-depth interviews. Participating providers are involved in different aspects of PrEP provision, aPN, and STI testing and include study staff members. Acceptability is defined as a positive rating about the intervention's potential performance in real-life conditions at the clinic and community levels.
Number of patient participants describing acceptability of aPN and STI testing (qualitative)Approximately 6 months after enrollmentTo gain deeper insights about the acceptability of enhanced PrEP delivery from the patient perspective, as subset of enrolled patients (including persons who initiate PrEP \[index\], referred partners who initiate PrEP, and persons who decline PrEP) will be asked to participate in in-depth interviews. Acceptability is defined as a positive rating about the intervention's potential performance in real-life conditions at the clinic and community levels.
Number of patient participants describing acceptability of aPN and STI testing (quantitative)Approximately 6 months after enrollmentTo gain deeper insights about the acceptability of enhanced PrEP delivery from the patient perspective, participants will be asked a series of questions using modified validated measures assessing acceptability on a 4-point Liker scale. Acceptability is defined as a positive rating about the intervention's appeal.
Number of patient participants describing feasibility of aPN and STI testing (qualitative)Approximately 6 months after enrollmentTo gain deeper insights about the feasibility of enhanced PrEP delivery from the patient perspective, as subset of enrolled patients (including persons who initiate PrEP \[index\], referred partners who initiate PrEP, and persons who decline PrEP) will be asked to participate in in-depth interviews. Acceptability is defined as a positive rating about the intervention's potential performance in real-life conditions at the clinic and community levels.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of named partners screened for PrEP eligibilityApproximately 1 yearThe number of named partners who return for PrEP screening using either passive notification or those who return only after tracing
Proportion of named partners screened for PrEP eligibilityApproximately 1 yearThe proportion of named partners who return for PrEP screening using either passive notification or those who return only after tracing
Number of named partners screened for PrEP eligibility who are ineligible for PrEPApproximately 1 yearAmong partners presenting for screening, the number of named partners who are ineligible for PrEP.
Proportion of named partners screened for PrEP eligibility who are ineligible for PrEPApproximately 1 yearAmong partners presenting for screening, the proportion of named partners who are ineligible for PrEP.
Number of PrEP-eligible named partners who initiate PrEPApproximately 1 yearAmong PrEP-eligible partners who present to the clinic, the number who agree to initiate PrEP
Number of STI clinic patients eligible for PrEPApproximately 1 yearThe number of STI clinic patients who would meet Malawi PrEP eligibility according to pre-defined criteria
Number of PrEP-eligible named partners who decline PrEPApproximately 1 yearReasons for declining PrEP will be reported qualitatively in order to inform future studies.
Proportion of consenting eligible patient participants who receive STI testingUp to approximately 6 monthsThe proportion of all participants who receive STI testing at baseline, 0, 3, and 6 months
Proportion of participants who receive appropriate STI treatment within 7 days of testingUp to approximately 6 monthsThe proportion of all patient participants who receive indicated treatment, based on results of etiologic STI testing, within 7 days of having been tested
Proportion of participants with symptomatic STIUp to approximately 6 monthsThe proportion of all patient participants (including persons who initiate PrEP \[index\], referred partners who initiate PrEP, and persons who initially decline PrEP) who have a symptomatic STI at enrollment, 1, 3, or 6 months
Proportion of participants with asymptomatic STIUp to approximately 6 monthsThe proportion of all patient participants (including persons who initiate PrEP \[index\], referred partners who initiate PrEP, and persons who initially decline PrEP) who have an asymptomatic STI at enrollment, 1, 3, or 6 months
Proportion of PrEP-eligible named partners who initiate PrEPApproximately 1 yearAmong PrEP-eligible partners who present to the clinic, the proportion who agree to initiate PrEP
Proportion of STI clinic patients eligible for PrEPApproximately 1 yearThe proportion of STI clinic patients who would meet Malawi PrEP eligibility
Number of PrEP eligible STI clinic patients referred for PrEPApproximately 1 yearThe number of PrEP eligible STI clinic patients who are referred for PrEP services
Proportion of PrEP eligible STI clinic patients referred for PrEPApproximately 1 yearThe proportion of PrEP eligible STI clinic patients who are referred for PrEP services
Number of PrEP eligible STI clinic patients declining PrEPApproximately 1 yearReasons for declining PrEP will be reported qualitatively in order to inform future studies.
Number of PrEP-eligible patients starting PrEP within 7-days of STI screeningApproximately 1 yearThe number of PrEP-eligible patients starting PrEP within 7-days of presenting for initial STI screening
Proportion of PrEP-eligible patients starting PrEP within 7-days of STI screeningApproximately 1 yearThe proportion of PrEP-eligible patients starting PrEP within 7-days of presenting for initial STI screening
Proportion of all participants retained on PrEPUp to approximately 6 monthsThe proportion of participants (including persons who initiate PrEP \[index\], referred partners who initiate PrEP, and persons who initially decline PrEP but start during study follow-up) who are retained on PrEP at 1, 3, and 6 months of follow-up.
Proportion of enrolled PrEP users naming at least one recent sex partnerUp to approximately 6 monthsThe proportion of PrEP users who name at least one recent sex partner, defined as having had sex with them in the prior 6 months, for assisted partner notification

Countries

Malawi

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026