Skip to content

Maternal Positioning to Correct Fetal Occiput Posterior

Maternal Positioning to Correct Fetal Occiput Posterior in the First Stage of Labor

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05307393
Enrollment
465
Registered
2022-04-01
Start date
2024-01-01
Completion date
2025-01-01
Last updated
2023-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obstetric Complication

Brief summary

In evaluating a patient's ability to have a normal vaginal delivery, a practitioner must consider three factors. Commonly referred to as the three P's, these include Power (contractions), Passage (pelvis and soft tissue) and passenger (baby). Power can be controlled through induction and augmentation agents. Passage is determined by the women's body habitus. Passenger includes the baby's estimated fetal weight (EFW) and position. Throughout the history of obstetrics, the baby's position has been a factor that has acted as a strong predictor of a woman's ability to deliver vaginally. Several researchers have looked into the percentage of babies born in the Occiput Anterior (fetus facing down) vs. Occiput Posterior (fetus facing up aka sunny side up) position. Studies have shown that the majority of babies are born in OA position and that the finding of an OA positioned baby is associated with a greater likelihood of a successful vaginal delivery. OP position is associated with higher risk of 3rd and 4th degree perineal lacerations, operative delivery (vacuum/forceps) and cesarean section. Therefore OP position poses a higher risk of morbidity to the patient and fetus. Multiple studies exist in the obstetrics and midwifery literature regarding maternal positioning to correct fetal malposition. Many of these studies have shown no significance and those that do have generated conflicting results and are consistently lacking in power. The aim of this prospective study is to determine if maternal positioning to either the side of fetal movement (contralateral/opposite to the fetal spine) or opposite of the side of fetal movement (ipsilateral to the fetal spine) during the first stage of labor is associated with correction of fetal OP to OA position. Upon admission to labor and delivery, following an initial ultrasound to confirm fetal OP position, women in this study will be randomly assigned to one of three groups; one control (Group A), and two experimental (Groups B and C) groups. Those assigned to Group A will be allowed to remain in any position they chose during their labor and delivery course. Group B will be placed in a dorsal recumbent, modified sims position on the side of fetal movement. Group C, will be placed in the same position but opposite that of which fetal kicks are felt. Subjects in the experimental group will be asked to remain in these positions throughout the majority of their labor and delivery course, up until the second stage of labor (10 cm dilated). They will be allowed to change positions for up to 10 min per hour for maternal comfort and any fetal resuscitation efforts. Anything longer than this will be considered a deviation from the protocol and will be documented as such, but all necessary intervention for fetal well-being will be allowed including changes in maternal position for longer than 10 minutes. Once a cervical dilation of 10cm is achieved all study interventions will be discontinued. Peanut balls and manual rotational maneuvers will not be allowed as they are considered confounding factors which may individually affect fetal position. Data will be collected from the hospital record. This data will include: maternal age, BMI, race, maternal medical complications, delivery type, laceration, fetal position at delivery, dilation on admission and weight of the baby.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPositioning

Upon admission to labor and delivery, following an initial ultrasound to confirm fetal OP position, women in this study will be randomly assigned to one of three groups; one control (Group A), and two experimental (Groups B and C) groups. Those assigned to Group A will be allowed to remain in any position they chose during their labor and delivery course. Group B will be placed in a dorsal recumbent, modified sims position on the side of fetal movement. Group C, will be placed in the same position but opposite that of which fetal kicks are felt.

Sponsors

Northwell Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women who are \>/=18yo * able to consent * \>/=37 weeks gestation (full term) with a viable singleton intrauterine pregnancy noted to be cephalic presentation in the OP position at the time of admission as noted on bedside ultrasound * All patients must be \<10cm, with a score of 3 or less out of 10 on a numeric pain rating scale * admitted to LIJ or NSUH for either spontaneous labor or labor induction.

Exclusion criteria

* All women younger than 18yo * unable to consent * admitted in the second stage of labor (\>10cm) or beyond, with nonviable pregnancies (i.e. IUFD), score of 4 or more on a numeric pain rating scale, or desiring cesarean section will be excluded. * all women with pregnancies noted to have IUGR, fetal anomalies, malpresentation (i.e. breech), multiple gestations or fetuses not in the OP position at time of admission will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fetal Position at time of deliveryFrom time of admission to deliveryRate of OA position in each arm at time of delivery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mode of deliveryFrom time of admission to deliveryVaginal delivery rates in each arm
Laceration TypeFrom time of admission to deliveryIncidence of 3rd and 4th degree lacerations in each arm

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactEmma Brenner, MD
ebrenner@northwell.edu7184707660
Backup ContactEmma Brenner, MD

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026