Skip to content

Stem Cells and Stromal Vascular Fraction for Temporomandibular Joint Disease

Stem Cells Transplantation for Temporomandibular Joint Disease: Phase I/II Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05305833
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-03-31
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
2023-12-01
Last updated
2022-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Temporomandibular Disorder, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Temporomandibular Joint Effusion, Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis, Temporomandibular Joint Pain

Brief summary

It will be evaluate the safety of mesenchymal stem cells and adipose tissue derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) in temporomandibular joint disease cases.

Detailed description

umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells produced under GMP facility in Erciyes University and SVF produced in operation theatre.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALStem Cells

ATMP

Sponsors

TC Erciyes University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic temporomandibular arthritic disorder * History of pain and joint noises for at least 3 months * Must have more than VAS 5 TMJ pain * must have internal derangement of TMJ * Limited mouth opening * Magnetic resonance imaging evidence of effusion or degeneration * Already treated with conservative methods (occlusal splint,pharmacological and/or physio-kinesio therapy) without satisfactory benefit.

Exclusion criteria

* Cancer patients * Immunosupressed patients * Previous TMJ traumas and fractures * Previous TMJ surgeries * TMJ ankylosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline pain at 6 month6. monthusing by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) higher scores mean worse outcome
Change from Baseline Pain at 15th day15th dayusing by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); higher scores mean worse outcome
Change from baseline maximum mouth opening at 15th day15th daythe distance between incisal edge of maxillary central incisor to the incisal edge of mandibular central incisor, when the mouth is opened as wide as possible painlessly
Change from baseline maximum mouth opening at 1 month1. monththe distance between incisal edge of maxillary central incisor to the incisal edge of mandibular central incisor, when the mouth is opened as wide as possible painlessly at first month; higher scores means a better outcome
Change from baseline maximum mouth opening at 3 months3. monththe distance between incisal edge of maxillary central incisor to the incisal edge of mandibular central incisor, when the mouth is opened as wide as possible painlessly at third month; higher scores means a better outcome
Change from baseline maximum mouth opening at 6 months6. monththe distance between incisal edge of maxillary central incisor to the incisal edge of mandibular central incisor, when the mouth is opened as wide as possible painlessly at 6th month,higher scores means a better outcome
Change from baseline pain at 1 month1. monthusing by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Change from baseline pain at 3 month3. monthusing by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline 'comfort ' at 6th month6 monthsusing by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); higher scores mean better outcome

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactZeynep B Gonen, DDS,PHD
zburcin@gmail.com00903522076666
Backup ContactGenkok center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026