Skip to content

Natural History and Nonoperative Management of Penetrating Cerebrovascular Injury

Natural History and Nonoperative Management of Penetrating Cerebrovascular Injury

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05305690
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-03-31
Start date
2016-05-01
Completion date
2023-01-03
Last updated
2022-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebrovascular Trauma

Keywords

penetrating cerebrovascular injury, nonoperative management, penetrating neck trauma, natural history, antithrombotic therapy, case series

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to evaluate a series of cases of penetrating cerebrovascular injury managed without upfront operation. Investigators focus on patient characteristics, injury details, treatment modalities, serial imaging studies, patient outcomes, and complications. Investigators will compare this patient population to patients managed with upfront operation for context.

Detailed description

Penetrating cerebrovascular injuries (PCVIs) are uncommon, with little data to guide management when emergent operative repair is not performed. Investigators hypothesized that PCVIs may be managed with antithrombotic therapy and directed use of endovascular interventions, but that PCVIs may require enhanced surveillance due to a risk of delayed complications. To perform this study, investigators will review patients with penetrating carotid and vertebral artery injuries managed at an urban Level I trauma center from 2016 to 2022. Patients will be included if they underwent initial nonoperative management (NOM). Patient characteristics, injury details, treatments, serial imaging, outcomes, and complications will be assessed in a retrospective manner using chart abstraction. Investigators will briefly compare these patients to those managed with upfront operations for context.

Interventions

OTHERNo intervention

This study did is a retrospective case series and does not involve an intervention. Investigators will compare patients managed operatively vs nonoperatively, focused on nonoperative therapy.

Sponsors

Denver Health Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Poudre Valley Health System
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Penetrating neck trauma * Carotid or vertebral artery injury

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of patients with strokeup to one year post-injuryischemic stroke

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of patients with injury progressionup to one year post-injuryCTA progression of PCVI severity (Grade)
number of patients with deathup to one year post-injurydeath
number of patients with bleeding complicationsup to one year post-injuryintracranial hemorrhage, GI bleed, etc requiring change in treatment
number of patients treated with operative explorationup to one year post-injuryAll patients in cohort are treated with initial trial of nonoperative management. This outcome assesses the number of patients who subsequently required operative neck exploration. This is readily attainable from operative reports.
number of patients treated with arterial embolization or arterial stent placementup to one year post-injuryIR procedures are adjuncts to nonoperative management. Performance of these procedures is readily attainable from IR procedure reports.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026