Skip to content

Transcrestal Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation With Injectable Bone Substitute

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Following Transcrestal Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation With Injectable Xenogeneic Bone Substitute in Gel Form: a Prospective Multicenter Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05305521
Acronym
INJTSFEXEN
Enrollment
70
Registered
2022-03-31
Start date
2018-04-15
Completion date
2022-12-15
Last updated
2023-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Edentulous Alveolar Ridge

Brief summary

To investigate clinical outcomes of transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation performed with an injectable xenograft in gel form, analyzing variables possibly influencing the results. Patients needing unilateral sinus floor elevation (residual crestal height \<5 mm) for the placement of a single implant were enrolled. Xenograft in gel form was injected through a crestal antrostomy in order to elevate sinus membrane and fill the sub-antral space. Simultaneous implant placement was performed when adequate primary stability was achievable. Graft height was measured immediately after surgery (T0) and after six months of healing (T1). Univariate and multivariate regression models were built to assess associations between clinical variables with implant survival and graft height at T1.

Detailed description

Purpose: To investigate clinical outcomes of transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation performed with an injectable xenograft in gel form, analyzing variables possibly influencing the results. Methods: Patients needing unilateral sinus floor elevation (residual crestal height \<5 mm) for the placement of a single implant were enrolled. Xenograft in gel form was injected through a crestal antrostomy in order to elevate sinus membrane and fill the sub-antral space. Simultaneous implant placement was performed when adequate primary stability was achievable. Graft height was measured immediately after surgery (T0) and after six months of healing (T1). Univariate and multivariate regression models were built to assess associations between clinical variables with implant survival and graft height at T1.

Interventions

Under local anesthesia (articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100.000), a minimally invasive full-thickness flap was elevated to expose the alveolar crest. Clinicians were left free to choose their preferred transcrestal antrostomy technique. After checking sinus membrane integrity with visual inspection and Valsalva maneuver, pre-heated (40°C) xenogeneic porcine bone substitute in gel form (Gel 40, Tecnoss, Giaveno, Italy) was injected through the crestal antrostomy in order to elevate the membrane and fill the sub-antral space. Duration of graft injection (in seconds) was recorded using a digital chronometer. Periapical intraoperative radiographs were taken to confirm membrane elevation of at least 10 mm.

PROCEDUREImplant placement

Simultaneous implant placement was performed when it was possible to achieve adequate primary stability in the residual crestal bone, otherwise crestal antrostomy was sealed by collagen sponges (Hemocollagene, Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, France) and implant insertion was postponed. Flaps were sutured with Sentineri technique and single stitches using synthetic monofilament

Sponsors

Teresa Lombardi DDS private practice
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fabio Bernardello MD, DDS private practice
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Luca Lamazza DDS, PhD private practice
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Grzegorz Zietek DDS private practice
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Giuseppe Troiano DDS, PhD private practice
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
International Piezosurgery Academy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* residual bone crest height \<5 mm and width ≥6 mm in the planned implant site; * healed bone crest (at least 6 months elapsed from tooth loss/extraction); * age \>18 years; * written informed consent given

Exclusion criteria

absolute medical contraindications to implant surgery; * uncontrolled diabetes (HBA1c \> 7.5%); * treated or under treatment with antiresorptives; * irradiated in the head and neck area in the last five years; * pregnant or breastfeeding; * substance abusers; * psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations; * patient not fully able to comply with the study protocol. * large sinus cavity (distance \>12 mm between buccal and palatal walls at 10-mm level, comprising the residual alveolar crest); * maxillary sinus conditions contraindicating sinus floor elevation; * poor oral hygiene and motivation (Full Mouth Plaque Score \>20% and or Full Mouth Bleeding Score \>10%)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
implant survival12 monthsimplant survival rate after one year of prosthetic loading

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
vertical bone gainsix monthsvertical bone gain (measured in mm on x-ray) six months after sinus augmentation
percentual graft shrinkagesix months% graft shrinkage during 6-month healing period
occurrence of complications12 monthsoccurrence of any complication or adverse event

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026