Skip to content

Stand UP to Rheumatoid Arthritis (SUPRA)

Innovative Trial Designs, Multi-omics and Advanced Computational Prediction to Transform Clinical Care in RA

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05305066
Acronym
SUPRA
Enrollment
75
Registered
2022-03-31
Start date
2023-02-01
Completion date
2030-12-01
Last updated
2026-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Rheumatoid arthritis, Pragmatic trials, Feasibility

Brief summary

Rheumatoid arthritis is a disabling arthritis that affects young women disproportionately. Although the physicians have some excellent treatments, they do not know which treatment is best for which patient. The investigators want to find ways to identify the right drug for the right patient at the right time. This is what personalized medicine is all about.

Detailed description

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a complex, chronic disease of the immune system characterized by disfiguring and disabling arthritis. It affects predominantly women (3:1 ratio with men) and has its peak onset during their most productive years (ages 30-50). RA is associated with serious morbidity (including impaired fertility and pregnancy outcomes, disability, and depression) and premature mortality (particularly from cardiovascular and infectious causes). The Arthritis Alliance of Canada estimates that the cost of RA will exceed $30 billion in Canada in 2040. First-line treatment of RA consists of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) with methotrexate considered as the gold standard. Yet, only 30% of patients will achieve adequate response to methotrexate and the majority will need additional treatment. The development of new biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) in the 20th century has transformed the treatment of RA. Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α molecules were the first clinically successful biologic therapies for RA. Drugs targeting other signaling pathways (JAK-STAT, which work downstream of interferons), inflammatory cytokines (IL-6), as well as B cells and T cells have now also become available. Molecules with novel targets (eg. GM-CSF, CD40L) are in clinical trials. Although hailed as 'game-changers' in patient care, the inconvenient truth is that even though nine different b/tsDMARDs are currently available to treat RA, 30% of patients will fail any particular drug. Moreover, physicians have no reliable way of predicting response and guiding treatment decisions. Clinical and genetic predictors have been the subject of intense research but these factors explain only a small portion of the observed variance in treatment response. Using the current trial-and-error approach, patients can cycle through multiple drugs before finally attaining disease control. This means months or years of suboptimal disease control and considerable losses in many domains including physical and emotional well-being, family and social networks, and occupational attainment. The lack of a personalized approach is particularly detrimental in RA because there is a narrow ''window of opportunity'' in the first 3-6 months of onset to control disease and optimize long term outcomes. In addition, failure to personalize treatment may also result in wasted spending on ineffective drugs, that cost up to $20,000 per patient per year, and exposing patients to unnecessary risks of adverse events, in particular serious infections. There is a critical need to 1) transform the current 'trial-and-error' treatment paradigm, 2) explore novel predictors of b/tsDMARD response in RA and, 3) harness the power of advanced analytical strategies to personalize treatment decision-making and optimize outcomes in RA. The investigators propose a multi-pronged solution that combines innovative trial designs, multi-omics and advanced computational prediction to transform clinical care in RA. The investigators propose to develop a new model of care and investigate new avenues, including sex and gender, diet, gut bacteria and environmental exposures, to make treatment decisions. The investigators will also use new methods of analyzing complex information. The highly talented research team has what is needed to transform the care of people living with RA. In preparation for a full-scale study, the investigators propose this feasibility study.

Interventions

DRUGTNFi

TNFi - any sub-cutaneous (sc) formulation, namely etanercept (receptor fusion protein) 50 mg sc per week, adalimumab (monoclonal antibody) 40 mg sc every 2 weeks, golimumab (monoclonal antibody) 50 mg sc every month, or certolizumab (pegylated fragment of a monoclonal antibody) 400 mg sc at week 0, 2 and 4, and then 200 mg sc every 2 weeks or 400 mg sc every 4 weeks.

DRUGAnti-IL6

Anti-IL6 receptor monoclonal antibodies - tocilizumab (if weight \<100 kg: 162 mg SC every other week, followed by an increase to weekly based on clinical response; if weight ≥100 kg: 162 mg SC weekly) or sarilumab (200 mg SC once every 2 weeks)

DRUGJAKi

JAKi - tofacitinib (JAK1/3 inhibitor) 5 mg po bid, baricitinib 2 mg po qd (JAK 1/2 inhibitor) or upadacitinib 15 mg po qd (JAK1 inhibitor)

Sponsors

Marie Hudson, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
CollaboratorOTHER
Montreal General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Lady Davis Institute
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Two separate sub-studies will be conducted: Sub-study 1: Subjects who have failed conventional DMARDS will be randomised to receive therapy with TNFi or anti-IL6 using covariate adaptive randomization. Sub-study 2: Subjects who have failed TNFi will be randomised to receive therapy with anti-IL6 or JAKi using covariate adaptive randomization.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years; * Arthritis that fulfills the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for RA; * Failure to standard conventional synthetic DMARDs and eligible for second-line b/tsDMARDs (Sub-study 1) or failure to at least one TNF inhibitor and eligible for third-line b/tsDMARDs (Sub-study 2).

Exclusion criteria

* Prior b/tsDMARDs for Sub-study 1 or prior b/tsDMARDs other than TNF inhibitors for Sub-study 2; * Contraindication to b/tsDMARD therapy, such as active infection or untreated latent TB, current malignancy, severe organ dysfunction, history of VTE (unless anticoagulated), high risk of cardiovascular disease, pregnancy/lactation; * Overlap with another inflammatory disease requiring specific immunosuppressive therapy, such as lupus nephritis; * Unable to provide consent or complete forms (alone or with assistance) in English or French

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients reaching DAS28 LDA state24 monthsExploratory outcome
Proportion of patients reaching SDAI <= 3.324 monthsExploratory outcome
Rate of recruitment at two RA referral centers over 12 months12 monthsFeasibility outcome
Prompt access to drugs4 weeksFeasibility outcome
Proportion of participants adhering to the allocated treatment24 monthsFeasibility outcome
Proportion of eligible patients who are invited to participate by their physician12 monthsPhysician acceptability outcome
Proportion of eligible patients who accept to participate12 monthsPatient acceptability outcome
Patient-reported outcomes (function, health-related quality of life, fatigue)24 monthsExploratory outcome

Countries

Canada

Contacts

CONTACTMarie Hudson, MD
marie.hudson@mcgill.ca514-340-8222
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMarie Hudson, MD

Sir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish General Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026