Skip to content

Randomized Assessment of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Prior to Port Placement

A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial Assessing the Utility of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Prior to Totally Implanted Venous Access Device (TIVAD) Insertion

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05304871
Enrollment
0
Registered
2022-03-31
Start date
2024-01-31
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2024-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vascular Access Ports

Brief summary

A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial assessing the utility of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to Totally Implanted Venous Access Device (TIVAD) insertion.

Detailed description

To assess the effectiveness of peri-procedural antibiotic prophylaxis in the reduction of TIVAD placement-related infection, study will compare placebo (normal saline (0.9% NaCl)) 50 cc IV 1:1 to the standard clinical antibiotic prophylaxis dose. The primary endpoint is cumulative incidence of local TIVAD surgical site infection (as determined by the CDC criteria for a deep and/or superficial SSI) or a central line associated blood stream infection at 30 days.

Interventions

DRUGCefazolin

infusion

OTHERsaline

infusion

Sponsors

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Placebo and antibiotic packaged similarly, code identified by Investigational Pharmacy. Patients and providers will not know which had been administered.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients requiring TIVAD insertion for long-term central venous access * Patients able to give informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* taking long-term antibiotics * unable to give consent to participate in the study * Patients that have a known infection at time of the procedure (as documented in e-DH). * Patients with a planned surgical procedure within 30 days of initial TIVAD insertion. * Patients that are currently on antibiotics or have received antibiotics within the last week. * Patients with allergies to cefazolin. * Patients with an absolute neutrophil count of less than 500/mm3 * Women who are pregnant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with surgical site infection30 days after proceduresurgical site infection; Effectiveness will be evaluated by comparing infection rates between patients that receive systemic prophylactic antibiotic and those that receive a placebo
Number of participants with CRBSI30 days after procedurecatheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI); Effectiveness will be evaluated by comparing infection rates between patients that receive systemic prophylactic antibiotic and those that receive a placebo

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average cost of systemic prophylactic antibiotic administration compared to the cost of treating TIVAD insertion related infections30 days after procedureexpense associated with catheter or catheter-related complication care; compare the costs of systemic prophylactic antibiotic administration, prior to totally implanted central venous access device (TIVAD) insertion, to the cost of treating TIVAD insertion related infections

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026