Skip to content

Impact of Psychological Therapies on Emergency Medical Patients

Exploring the Transferability of Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) to a General Hospital Emergency Inpatient Ward

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05303870
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-03-31
Start date
2021-10-10
Completion date
2022-03-27
Last updated
2022-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mental Disorder, Mental Health Disorder, Mental Health Wellness 1

Brief summary

Prevalence of anxiety and depression in the general population is known, but is under researched in the acute hospital setting and there is little evidence on the prevalence of anxiety and depression within the emergency medical admission population. A potential intervention for treating such mental health prevalence would be in the form of IAPT methodology which has been utilised in other parts of the NHS demonstrating good outcomes. Therefore, this feasibility study will explore the utility of IAPT in the acute setting. This study will explore the prevalence of anxiety and depression in the emergency medical population within medical inpatient wards , utilising the assessment tools adopted by the IAPT services and explained in detail below. The study will explore a) feasibility of introducing psychological intervention to an emergency medical ward and b) provide preliminary data on the outcome of this intervention on hospital length of stay and readmission rates.

Interventions

OTHERImproving access to psychological therapies (IAPT)

IAPT services provide evidence-based treatments for people with depression and anxiety disorders, and comorbid long-term physical health conditions or medically unexplained symptoms. IAPT services are characterised by three key principles: 1. Evidence-Based psychological therapies at the appropriate dose: NICE recommended therapies matched to the mental health problem, at the intensity and duration designed to optimise outcomes. 2. Appropriately trained and supervised workforce. 3. Routine outcome monitoring.

Sponsors

University of Essex
CollaboratorOTHER
East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients admitted to Ipswich Hospital into a ward that cares for patients who are medical emergencies. * Patients who score 3 or higher on one or both of the GAD 2 and PHQ 2. * Patients that have capacity to consent. * Over 18 years old. * Ability to speak and read in English as the study will not have the resources to employ interpreters or to get documentation translated. * Participants that are not deemed suicidal via screening and medical and nurse assessment.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients not receiving care on a ward caring for medical emergencies. * Patients under the age of 18 years old. * Patients scoring \< 3 on both GAD 2 and PHQ 2. * Patients who do not have capacity to consent. * Participants that are suicidal as via screening and medical and nurse assessment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with moderate or severe anxietyUp to 6 monthsHow many participants enrol in to the study, that are eligible to participate.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IAPT viewsUp to 6 monthsThematic analysis of in depth interviews on staff and patients regarding the IAPT intervention.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026