Skip to content

Patient Priorities Care for Hispanics With Dementia

Patient Priorities Care for Hispanics With Dementia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05303194
Acronym
PPC-HD
Enrollment
21
Registered
2022-03-31
Start date
2022-05-31
Completion date
2024-10-30
Last updated
2025-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dementia, Multiple Chronic Conditions

Keywords

multiple chronic conditions, dementia, Hispanic

Brief summary

Most persons living with dementia (PlwD) have multiple chronic conditions (MCC). Managing MCC typically involves adhering to clinical practice guidelines for single diseases. This approach often results in burdensome care that usually does not reflect what matters most to patients. To address the challenges of caring for patients with MCC, Patient Priorities Care (PPC) was developed - a process that aligns treatment recommendations with patient priorities rather than single-disease guidelines, to improve care. Successful completion of this pragmatic pilot project will help determine how to best embedded PPC in a Healthcare system that serves a large Hispanic population. The investigators will determine if the benefits previously reported with the use of PPC hold in Hispanics with dementia.

Detailed description

STUDY OBJECTIVES * Primary Objective Adapt PPC to be culturally appropriate for Hispanics with dementia and test its feasibility in an outpatient setting. * Secondary Objectives The adapted version of PPC will improve care by identifying the healthcare priorities of Hispanics with dementia and aligning these priorities with the care participants receive. BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE * Background on Condition, Disease, or Other Primary Study Focus Most older adults with dementia have multiple chronic conditions (MCC), experience difficulty managing their MCC, and have poorer outcomes. Managing MCC typically involves adhering to single-disease clinical practice guidelines (CPG). This approach often results in burdensome care with outcomes that may not reflect what matters most to patients. To address the challenges for caring for patients with MCC, Patient Priorities Care (PPC) was developed - an approach that aligns disease management with patient priorities rather than CPG, to improve care. PPC is feasible and effective. Patients report less burdensome treatment and have fewer medications and referrals after going through PPC. PPC also helps clinicians recommend home and community services that are aligned with patient priorities. Focusing on patient priorities rather than CPG is a patient-centered approach that integrates well in routine clinic encounters. * Study Rationale Physical, emotional, and cognitive impairments related to dementia interfere with disease self-management. Persons living with dementia (PlwD) therefore rely on caregivers for care and decision-making. Caregivers may add complexity to the patient-clinician interaction but are essential for translating 'what matters most' for PlwD into healthcare decisions. Patient and caregiver involvement should include identifying outcome goals and care preferences (health priorities) as well as aligning care to meet those priorities. It is therefore important to integrate caregivers into the healthcare process to achieve high-quality, family-centered care. PlwD from minority groups experience more difficulties and poorer outcomes compared to their Non-Hispanic White (NHW) counterparts. Hispanics are the fastest-growing underrepresented population in the USA and have 1.5 times higher risk of dementia compared to NHW. Hispanics rely heavily on their families and there is a cultural expectation of families to provide care to members in need. Recent data report older Hispanics prefer care at home rather than professional care. These cultural differences and language barriers play key roles in shaping healthcare priorities and how priorities impact outcomes among Hispanics. STUDY DESIGN For the adaptation 5 Hispanic patients will be included and for the feasibility test 20 Hispanic patients will be included. The process will be as follows: 1. Eligible Hispanic patients will be identified through the patient roster of the Geriatrics Outpatient Clinic at UTMB. 2. Primary care providers will be asked to select patients that would not be good candidates for the study. 3. A research team member will contact the eligible patients and invite them to schedule the priority setting an appointment. For those that agree she will obtain assent and/or consent and schedule the session. 4. On the day of the session, the facilitator will use the PPC materials and identify the patient priorities, and document them in the electronic health record (Step 1). The visit will be audio recorded. 5. A research team member will schedule an appointment with the patient's primary care provider (PCP) within 2 weeks to conduct the alignment portion of the PPC approach (Step two). 6. The primary care provider will discuss the patient priorities and the provider will align care to meet those priorities and document changes in care based on the discussion on the electronic health record. 7. A research member will call the patient and assess their satisfaction with the PPC approach 2 weeks after the visit with the primary care provider. 8. A research member will contact the primary care provider and assess their satisfaction with the PPC approach. 9. The PI, Co-PI, and advisory team will review all the information and make adjustments to the protocol for the feasibility phase. 10. Activities 1-8 will be repeated with 20 Hispanic patients to test the feasibility of the adapted PPC approach for Hispanics. Given the presence of cognitive impairment, consent from a family caregiver will be obtained.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPatient Priorities Care (PPC) Approach

First, identify patient priorities, and second align care received with those priorities.

BEHAVIORALAdapted PPC

First, identify patient priorities, and second align care received with those priorities.

Sponsors

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
CollaboratorOTHER
The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The study has two phases: 1) an initial adaptation phase; and 2) a feasibility testing phase. For the adaptation phase 5 Hispanics with multiple chronic condition and without dementia will be invited to participate. These participants will need to consent to be part of the study. For the second phase, the investigators will determine if participants with dementia have capacity by asking their primary care providers or by administering the telephone version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. If a score of less than 12 is obtained, the caregiver will be asked to consent for both participants.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

A) For adaptation (n=5) * Patient's primary care provider is located in the UTMB Geriatrics Outpatient Clinic in Galveston. * Patient identifies as Hispanic. * Patient speaks English or Spanish. * Patient has multiple chronic conditions listed as diagnoses in their electronic health record (3 or more chronic conditions). * Consent to participate in all parts of the study. * Primary care provider agrees with participation. B) For feasibility testing (n=20) * Patient's primary care provider is located in the UTMB Geriatrics Outpatient Clinic in Galveston. * Patient identifies as Hispanic. * Patient speaks English or Spanish. * Patient has multiple chronic conditions listed as diagnoses in their electronic health record (3 or more chronic conditions). * Patient has diagnosis of dementia. * Have a caregiver willing to participate in the study. * Patient consent if he/she has capacity as deemed by their primary care provider or assent if he/she doesn't have capacity. * Caregiver consent.

Exclusion criteria

A) For adaptation (n=5) * Patient's primary care provider located at UTMB but not in the Geriatrics Outpatient Clinic. * Non-Hispanic patients. * Speaks language other than English or Spanish. * Patient does not have multiple chronic conditions. * Deemed ineligible by primary care provider. * Patient has diagnosis of dementia. B) For feasibility testing (n=20) * Patient's primary care provider located at UTMB but not in the Geriatrics Outpatient Clinic. * Non-Hispanic patients. * Speaks language other than English or Spanish. * Patient does not have multiple chronic conditions. * Patient doesn't have diagnosis of dementia. * Patient deemed ineligible by primary care provider. * Patient doesn't provide consent or assent based on capacity. * Caregiver doesn't provide consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-reported Perceived Value of Patient Priorities Care (PPC) ApproachOn average one month after baselineParticipants were asked to grade how valuable they thought the PPC approach was. We report the percentage of participants who responded valuable or very valuable on a scale from 1 to 5 with 1 representing not valuable and 5 representing very valuable.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Documented Changes in the Electronic Health Record That Indicate Care Alignment Was DoneApproximately one month after baselineDichotomous variable (yes vs no). Review of medical records to identify changes in care based on priorities identified by participants as a result of the Patient Priorities Care (PPC) approach. All medical charts were reviewed for language indicating that the primary care providers used the patient priorities to align the care provided to the patient. The default sentence provided to the providers was Based on the patient's specific priorities, including outcome goals and care preferences, we decided to... If information resembling this wording was found, then Care alignment was marked as positive. Otherwise, it was marked as negative.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited based on Hispanic ethnicity from a UTMB Galveston outpatient clinic, participants without cognitive impairment, and with cognitive impairment. The first participant was enrolled on May 31st, 2022 and the last participant was enrolled in January 2024.

Pre-assignment details

The number of participants started/completed represents the number of individual participants.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PPC Adaptation
Five participants with multiple chronic conditions
5
PPC Feasibility
Sixteen with multiple chronic conditions and cognitive impairment
16
Total21

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPPC FeasibilityPPC AdaptationTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
16 Participants5 Participants21 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Cognitive impairment16 Participants0 Participants16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants5 Participants21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Multiple Chronic Conditions16 Participants5 Participants21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
16 Participants5 Participants21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants3 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 40 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 40 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Self-reported Perceived Value of Patient Priorities Care (PPC) Approach

Participants were asked to grade how valuable they thought the PPC approach was. We report the percentage of participants who responded valuable or very valuable on a scale from 1 to 5 with 1 representing not valuable and 5 representing very valuable.

Time frame: On average one month after baseline

Population: One participant from the Adaptation arm was lost to follow-up after the initial visit. In the Feasibility testing group one participant withdrew after consenting and before the first visit, and one participant was lost to follow-up after completing the intervention. Only patients are included in the analysis, caregivers are not active participants in the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Patient Priorities Care (PPC) AdaptationSelf-reported Perceived Value of Patient Priorities Care (PPC) Approach75 percentage of participants
PPC Feasibility TestingSelf-reported Perceived Value of Patient Priorities Care (PPC) Approach85.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Documented Changes in the Electronic Health Record That Indicate Care Alignment Was Done

Dichotomous variable (yes vs no). Review of medical records to identify changes in care based on priorities identified by participants as a result of the Patient Priorities Care (PPC) approach. All medical charts were reviewed for language indicating that the primary care providers used the patient priorities to align the care provided to the patient. The default sentence provided to the providers was Based on the patient's specific priorities, including outcome goals and care preferences, we decided to... If information resembling this wording was found, then Care alignment was marked as positive. Otherwise, it was marked as negative.

Time frame: Approximately one month after baseline

Population: One participant was lost to follow-up after baseline and did not complete the study in the Adaptation group. In the feasibility group one participants withdrew before the PPC approach could be completed.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Patient Priorities Care (PPC) AdaptationNumber of Participants With Documented Changes in the Electronic Health Record That Indicate Care Alignment Was Done4 Participants
PPC Feasibility TestingNumber of Participants With Documented Changes in the Electronic Health Record That Indicate Care Alignment Was Done15 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026