Skip to content

Eribulin as a Second-line Treatment in Triple-negative Advanced Breast Cancer

Observational Study Evaluating the Role of Eribulin as a Second-line Treatment in Triple-negative Advanced Breast Cancer

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05302778
Acronym
HERMIONE-10
Enrollment
200
Registered
2022-03-31
Start date
2021-03-22
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2023-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Metastatic Breast Cancer, Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Keywords

breast cancer, triple negative, second line, eribulin, real world

Brief summary

Multicenter, retrospective and prospective, cohort, observational study evaluating the clinical efficacy and tolerability of Eribulin as second-line treatment in accordance with the indications authorized by AIFA in patients with triple negative advanced breast cancer in a real world setting.

Detailed description

The study, multicenter, retrospective and prospective, cohort, observational, describes the modalities of treatment with Eribulin as a second line therapy for triple negative breast cancer and clinical outcomes in a population real-world, evaluating any differences with the results obtained in clinical trials. Therapeutic sequences will also be evaluated with the aim of providing a photograph of the choices made in clinical practice in this historical moment characterized by rapid evolution of new molecules available to clinicians. A total of at least 200 patients with triple negative advanced breast cancer treated with Eribulin as second line will be enrolled in the retrospective or prospective cohort. Enrollment period will last 2 years. Pseudoanonymized data will be collected in a electroctronic database (RedCap Cloud); here the list of the main variables collected: * Patient Registration * Demography * Pregnancy test * Past history and habits of the patient * Previous antineoplastic therapy * Anamnesis close to entering the study * Vital signs and ECOG performance status (WHO) * Blood chemistry tests * RECIST 1.1 Baseline and re-evaluations * 12 Lead ECG evaluation * Eribulin cycles * Adverse events * Previous and concomitant medications * End of study The retrospective analysis of the choices made in clinical practice and the benefits obtained from the second therapeutic lines could provide important data to favor the definition of prospective randomized studies, and guide the clinician towards a better therapeutic path.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

EISAI s.r.l.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Milano Bicocca
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Performance status according to ECOG equal to 0-2 * Locally advanced or triple negative metastatic breast cancer (HR- and HER2-) confirmed histologically * Progressing after first-line chemotherapy for advanced disease * Previous anthracyclines and taxanes therapy (in an adjuvant, neoadjuvant or metastatic), unless the patient is ineligible to receive such treatments * Treatment with Eribulin mesylate since 2017, in accordance with AIFA indications * Adequate haematological, renal and hepatic function, as per clinical practice * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Breast cancer HER2 + or HR + * Treatment with Eribulin in the context of clinical studies * Patients unsuitable for treatment with Eribulin * Diagnosis of other malignancies in the two years prior to enrollment, with one exception of adequately treated localized basal cell or squamous cell carcinomas of the skin o cervical carcinomas undergoing curative treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free survival (PFS)Entire study duration, approximately 3 yearsPFS defined as time from the beginning of treatment to disease progression or death

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Response Rate (ORR)Entire study duration, approximately 3 yearsOOR defined as the percentage of patients who achieved a partial response (PR) or a complete response (CR) as best response according to RECIST 1.1
Disease Control Rate (DCR)Entire study duration, approximately 3 yearsDCR defined as the percentage of patients who achieved a partial response (PR), a complete response (CR) or a stable disease (SD) as best response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, according to the site of metastatic disease (bone disease vs visceral disease with or without bone involvement).
Site of progressionEntire study duration, approximately 3 yearsDescription of sites of progression in patients with first bone relapse
Time to progression (TTP)Entire study duration, approximately 3 yearsTTP defined as the time from the beginning of treatment to disease progression or death
Survival after progressionEntire study duration, approximately 3 yearsSurvival after progression
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0Entire study duration, approximately 3 yearsNumber of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Duration of response and disease controlEntire study duration, approximately 3 yearsDuration of response and disease control

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactMarina E. Cazzaniga, MD
marina.cazzaniga@asst-monza.it+39/0392339037

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026