Skip to content

The Perceived Efficiency and Acceptability of Remote Real-time Health Monitoring System in Elderly Residential Setting and Community Isolation Facility

The Perceived Efficiency and Acceptability of Remote Real-time Health Monitoring System in Elderly Residential Setting and Community Isolation Facility

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05302440
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-03-31
Start date
2022-03-21
Completion date
2022-05-09
Last updated
2024-07-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Technology

Keywords

Gerontechnology, Smart Healthcare Device, Digital Health Technology

Brief summary

The study has 3 primary research questions and 6 secondary research questions targeting care staff in the setting of residential care homes for the elderly. The 3 primary research questions are: 1. Will care staff perceive the remote real-time health monitoring system with ring-like sensor as efficient? 2. Will the system facilitate any early detection of abnormal vital signs? 3. Will the system facilitate early delivery of medical support? The 6 secondary research questions are: 4. What are the numbers of hospital admissions and further medical assistance due to the adoption of the system? 5. Will the system reduce the stress level of the care staff? 6. What are the perceived benefits and acceptability of the care staff towards the system? 7. What should be considered when developing the evaluation framework for the adaption of the system in elderly residential setting? 8. Are there any barriers and difficulties in the set-up of the system? 9. What are the concerns in choosing wireless or cable connection for the monitoring device?

Detailed description

Study design This is a single-group 4-week trial of using the remote health monitoring system. All care staff who manage the system will complete a very brief survey (1-minute) after each work shift for 2 weeks. Detection of abnormal vital signs will be recorded by the system. Hospital admission and further medical assistance due to the adoption of the system will be documented by the care team. The care staff will be interviewed about their perceived benefits and acceptability of the system. Subjects Care staff in Haven of Hope Woo Ping Care & Attention Home and Haven of Hope Nursing Home who are responsible to set up and operate real-time remote health monitoring system will be recruited. They also need to be able to read and understand Chinese. Procedures Implementation The remote monitoring system will record the temperature, pulse and oxygen saturation (SpO2) of the residents wearing the equipment every minute. When the staff find abnormal vital signs, they will provide further medical assistance. After every shift during the trial period for 2 weeks, they will fill in a 1-minute survey. Data collection The remote monitoring system will remotely and real-time record the temperature, pulse and SpO2 of the residents wearing the sensor. The sensor is like a ring that wraps a finger. When the staff are notified of any abnormal vital signs by the system via screen display and notification sound, they will deliver further medical assistance. Hospital admission and further medical assistance due to the adoption of the system will be documented by the care team under pre-existing practice. After every shift during the trial period for 2 weeks, the staff will fill in a 1-minute survey about their operation and perceived efficiency of the system, such as facilitating more frequent monitoring of particular residents' vital signs, the provision of further medical assistance, perceived time saving in monitoring vital signs, and acceptability of the system. They could record their experience of using the system in a messaging mobile phone app in audio format. If they fill in the survey for fewer than 10 times during the 2 weeks, they would be invited to continue to fill in the survey after work shift after the 2 weeks until they fill in it for at least 10 times. Meanwhile, as a staff may complete more than 1 shift per day, they would not be invited to fill in the survey after having completed it for 12 items. All data collected that is related to residents is not identifiable. There are two parts of the qualitative sub-study. When the system is set up, the unit in-charge and care staff responsible to set up the system from each participating unit will be interviewed by research assistant(s). Themes of qualitative questions include: (1) barriers and difficulties in the set-up of the system; and (2) the concerns in choosing wireless or cable connection for the monitoring device. Meanwhile, when the main trial ends, a total of 8-10 care staff from all participating units responsible to operate the system will be interviewed about their perceived benefits and acceptability of the system. Themes of qualitative questions include: (1) Acceptance of using the remote health monitoring system (including ease of operation, care staff's confidence and convenience in using the system); (2) Benefits of using the remote health monitoring system (including usefulness of the innovation, impacts on quality of care); (3) Concerns in using the remote health monitoring system (including if any residents stop using the sensor and the reason behind); and (4) Overall perception of using the remote health monitoring system. For both parts of the qualitative sub-study, an interview guide with open-ended and iterative questions will be used to probe for more experiences from the interviewees. Each interview will be conducted by a trained research assistant and will last about 15 - 30 minutes. Blinding Blinding is not applicable in this single group study. Sample size determination The sample size is estimated by the number and availability of the staff in the participating units. It is estimated that a total of 10-12 staff will be recruited. Data analyses The proportion of all the responses in the staff survey will be calculated. The number of abnormal vital signs, hospital admission and further medical assistance due to the adoption of the system will be counted. The qualitative interview content will be transcribed verbatim in Chinese for further analysis. The qualitative interview transcripts will be analyzed using framework analysis to construct a coherent and logical structure from the classification of many opinions and perceptions of the system. The results will then be discussed and consolidated in the panel meetings with the co-authors.

Interventions

DEVICEremote real-time health monitoring system with ring-like sensor

The remote monitoring system will constantly record the temperature, pulse and SpO2 of the residents wearing the equipment. When the staff find abnormal vital signs, they will provide further medical assistance. All care staff who manage the system will be complete a very brief survey (1-minute) after each work shift for 14 days.

Sponsors

Haven of Hope Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Social Innovation and Entrepreneurship Development Fund, Hong Kong
CollaboratorOTHER
The University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

for main trial: * All care staff in Haven of Hope Woo Ping Care & Attention Home and Haven of Hope Nursing Home who are responsible to operate remote real-time health monitoring system will be invited to participate. Inclusion Criteria for qualitative study about experience of setting up the system: * The Unit in-charge and care staff responsible to set up the system from each of the participating units will be recruited. Inclusion Criteria for qualitative study about the operation of the system: * All care staff joining the main trial will be recruited.

Exclusion criteria

* No

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Staff Perceived Overall Time-saving of the System Over 14 Daysevery day during the 2-week trial periodAfter every shift for 14 days, the staff fill in a survey for the following item with 5-point Likert scale (5= Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree): 3\. The remote real-time health monitoring system reduces your time for measuring vital signs of the residents in the previous shift
Average Staff Perception of the System on Early Detection of Abnormal Vital Signs Over 14 Daysevery day during the 2-week trial periodAfter every shift for 14 days, the staff fill in a survey for the following item with 5-point Likert scale (5= Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree): 2\. The remote real-time health monitoring system facilitates you to monitor the vital signs in the previous shift
Average Staff Perception of the System on Its Facilitation of Early Delivery of Medical Support Over 14 Daysevery day during the 2-week trial periodAfter every shift for 14 days, the staff fill in a survey for the following item with 5-point Likert scale (5= Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree): 1\. The remote real-time health monitoring system facilitates you to provide early delivery of medical support in the previous shift

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Agreeing That the Sensor Easily Detaches From the Participantsat the end of 2-week trial periodDuring qualitative interviews, the number of participants agreeing that the sensor easily detaches from the participants
Number of Participants Agreeing That the Vital Signs Measured by the System Are Accurateat the end of 2-week trial periodDuring qualitative interviews, the number of participants agreeing that the vital signs measured by the system are accurate
Number of Hospital Admissions and Further Medical Assistanceevery day during the 2-week trial periodNumber of hospital admissions and further medical assistance due to the use of the system, according to hospitalization record
Number of Participants Preferring Cable or Wireless Connection for the Systemat the start of 2-week trial periodDuring qualitative interviews, the number of participants preferring cable or wireless connection for the system
Number of Participants Agreeing That the Size of the Sensors Fit the Participantsat the start of 2-week trial periodDuring qualitative interviews, the number of participants agreeing that the size of the sensors fit the participants
Average Perceived Staff Stress Level Over 14 Daysevery day during the 2-week trial periodAfter every shift for 14 days, the staff fill in a survey for the following items with 5-point Likert scale (5= Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree) 4. The remote real-time health monitoring system has made you feel at ease in the previous shift (For example, you feel at ease as the system facilitates easy monitoring on the vital signs of the resident) 5. The remote real-time health monitoring system has made you feel uncomfortable in the previous shift (For example, you worry that residents might take off the sensor; bad connection or system malfunction) 6. The remote real-time health monitoring system relieves your stress in the previous shift
Number of Participants Agreeing That the System Can Remote Monitor the Vital Signs of the Participantsat the end of 2-week trial periodDuring qualitative interviews, the number of participants agreeing that the system can remote monitor the vital signs of the participants

Countries

Hong Kong

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The participants will be recruited in the elderly residential setting and community isolation facility. The recruitment period of each test sites is one week. They also need to be able to read and understand Chinese.

Pre-assignment details

Failure to read and understand Chinese will deter smooth communication and undermine the objectivity of the study

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Single-group
All care staff who manage the system will complete a very brief survey (1-minute) after each work shift for 14 days. Detection of abnormal vital signs will be recorded by the system. Hospital admission and further medical assistance due to the use of the system will be documented by the care team. The staff will be interviewed about their perceived benefits and acceptability of the system. remote real-time health monitoring system with ring-like sensor: The remote monitoring system will constantly record the temperature, pulse and SpO2 of the residents wearing the equipment. When the staff find abnormal vital signs, they will provide further medical assistance. All care staff who manage the system will be complete a very brief survey (1-minute) after each work shift for 14 days.
20
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSingle-group
Age, Customized
Age group
30-39 years
3 Participants
Age, Customized
Age group
<30 years
6 Participants
Age, Customized
Age group
40-49 years
2 Participants
Age, Customized
Age group
50-59 years
4 Participants
Age, Customized
Age group
≥60 years
3 Participants
Age, Customized
Age group
Did not report
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Chinese
20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
20 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Did not report
3 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
13 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Average Staff Perceived Overall Time-saving of the System Over 14 Days

After every shift for 14 days, the staff fill in a survey for the following item with 5-point Likert scale (5= Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree): 3\. The remote real-time health monitoring system reduces your time for measuring vital signs of the residents in the previous shift

Time frame: every day during the 2-week trial period

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single-groupAverage Staff Perceived Overall Time-saving of the System Over 14 Days2.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Primary

Average Staff Perception of the System on Early Detection of Abnormal Vital Signs Over 14 Days

After every shift for 14 days, the staff fill in a survey for the following item with 5-point Likert scale (5= Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree): 2\. The remote real-time health monitoring system facilitates you to monitor the vital signs in the previous shift

Time frame: every day during the 2-week trial period

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single-groupAverage Staff Perception of the System on Early Detection of Abnormal Vital Signs Over 14 Days2.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Primary

Average Staff Perception of the System on Its Facilitation of Early Delivery of Medical Support Over 14 Days

After every shift for 14 days, the staff fill in a survey for the following item with 5-point Likert scale (5= Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree): 1\. The remote real-time health monitoring system facilitates you to provide early delivery of medical support in the previous shift

Time frame: every day during the 2-week trial period

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single-groupAverage Staff Perception of the System on Its Facilitation of Early Delivery of Medical Support Over 14 Days2.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Average Perceived Staff Stress Level Over 14 Days

After every shift for 14 days, the staff fill in a survey for the following items with 5-point Likert scale (5= Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree) 4. The remote real-time health monitoring system has made you feel at ease in the previous shift (For example, you feel at ease as the system facilitates easy monitoring on the vital signs of the resident) 5. The remote real-time health monitoring system has made you feel uncomfortable in the previous shift (For example, you worry that residents might take off the sensor; bad connection or system malfunction) 6. The remote real-time health monitoring system relieves your stress in the previous shift

Time frame: every day during the 2-week trial period

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single-groupAverage Perceived Staff Stress Level Over 14 Daysitem 4. feel at ease2.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Single-groupAverage Perceived Staff Stress Level Over 14 Daysitem 5. feel uncomfortable2.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Single-groupAverage Perceived Staff Stress Level Over 14 Daysitem 6. relieves stress2.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Number of Hospital Admissions and Further Medical Assistance

Number of hospital admissions and further medical assistance due to the use of the system, according to hospitalization record

Time frame: every day during the 2-week trial period

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Single-groupNumber of Hospital Admissions and Further Medical AssistanceHospital admissions1 events
Single-groupNumber of Hospital Admissions and Further Medical AssistanceFurther medical assistance1 events
Secondary

Number of Participants Agreeing That the Sensor Easily Detaches From the Participants

During qualitative interviews, the number of participants agreeing that the sensor easily detaches from the participants

Time frame: at the end of 2-week trial period

Population: Interviews were conducted with 6 participants. 2 participants were invited from each of the service unit.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-groupNumber of Participants Agreeing That the Sensor Easily Detaches From the ParticipantsAgreeing that the sensor easily detaches from the participants4 Participants
Single-groupNumber of Participants Agreeing That the Sensor Easily Detaches From the ParticipantsNot agreeing that the sensor easily detaches from the participants2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Agreeing That the Size of the Sensors Fit the Participants

During qualitative interviews, the number of participants agreeing that the size of the sensors fit the participants

Time frame: at the start of 2-week trial period

Population: Interviews were conducted with 6 participants. 2 participants were invited from each of the service unit.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-groupNumber of Participants Agreeing That the Size of the Sensors Fit the ParticipantsAgreeing that the size of the sensors fit the participants2 Participants
Single-groupNumber of Participants Agreeing That the Size of the Sensors Fit the ParticipantsNot agreeing that the size of the sensors fit the participants4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Agreeing That the System Can Remote Monitor the Vital Signs of the Participants

During qualitative interviews, the number of participants agreeing that the system can remote monitor the vital signs of the participants

Time frame: at the end of 2-week trial period

Population: Interviews were conducted with 6 participants. 2 participants were invited from each of the service unit.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-groupNumber of Participants Agreeing That the System Can Remote Monitor the Vital Signs of the ParticipantsAgreeing that the system can remote monitor the vital signs of the participants2 Participants
Single-groupNumber of Participants Agreeing That the System Can Remote Monitor the Vital Signs of the ParticipantsNot agreeing that the system can remote monitor the vital signs of the participants4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Agreeing That the Vital Signs Measured by the System Are Accurate

During qualitative interviews, the number of participants agreeing that the vital signs measured by the system are accurate

Time frame: at the end of 2-week trial period

Population: Interviews were conducted with 6 participants. 2 participants were invited from each of the service unit.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-groupNumber of Participants Agreeing That the Vital Signs Measured by the System Are AccurateAgreeing that the vital signs measured by the system are accurate2 Participants
Single-groupNumber of Participants Agreeing That the Vital Signs Measured by the System Are AccurateNot agreeing that the vital signs measured by the system are accurate4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Preferring Cable or Wireless Connection for the System

During qualitative interviews, the number of participants preferring cable or wireless connection for the system

Time frame: at the start of 2-week trial period

Population: Interviews were conducted with 6 participants. 2 participants were invited from each of the service unit.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-groupNumber of Participants Preferring Cable or Wireless Connection for the SystemPrefer cable connection6 Participants
Single-groupNumber of Participants Preferring Cable or Wireless Connection for the SystemPrefer wireless connection0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026