Lymphocyte, Neutrophil, Postoperative Complications
Conditions
Keywords
fasting, carbohydrate, colorectal carcinoma, nutritional status
Brief summary
This study evaluated the impact of a preoperative carbohydrate oral drink on the postoperative Neutrophil / Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and the incidence of postoperative complications after elective open colon surgery compared to the conventional preoperative fasting protocol. Hypothesis was: preoperative carbohydrate loading reduces postoperative NLR value and reduces the incidence and severity of postoperative complications in colorectal surgery.
Detailed description
This prospective randomized, controlled clinical study was carried out in the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit and Department of Surgery at the Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The study protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee. A total of 60 participants who scheduled for elective open colon surgery and fulfilled study criteria were included into study. The purpose and procedures of the study were fully explained and voluntary, informed, written consent was obtained from each participant. The participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups, depending on the preoperative treatment. There were no reliable published data for effects of preoperative carbohydrate loading on postoperative NLR values. Based on our hypothesis, a pilot study was performed with ten patients per group. Mean postoperative NLR value was 8,67±4,98 in the participants with a conventional preoperative fasting protocol versus 4,76±2,83 in the participants with preoperative carbohydrate loading. Sample size was estimated using sample size calculator software and power analysis with 95% confidence interval and power of 80%. Statistical significance was considered as p\< 0,05. The calculation indicated 27 participants per group would be sufficient to detect a difference of 3,91 with a standard deviation of 4,93 in NLR value between the groups. Assuming dropout of 10%, 30 participants per group were included. Block randomization was used with a block size of six and a 1:1 group ratio. A computer-generated random numbers indicating preoperative intervention, were sealed in opaque envelopes. An investigator who conducted randomization and opened the envelopes the night before surgery was blinded to the study protocol as well as the surgeons, nurses, anesthesiologists and staff involved in data collection. The participants in the Fasting group (control group) stopped oral intake at 12:00 pm the night before surgery and underwent to a conventional preoperative fasting protocol. Participants in the Carbohydrate group (experimental group) consumed 400 ml of a clear carbohydrate solution at 10:00 pm the night before surgery and 200 ml of a clear carbohydrate solution, 2 hours prior induction of anesthesia. All participants underwent general anesthesia followed by colorectal surgery. Fasting peripheral venous blood samples were collected at 06:00 am on the day of surgery (basal value), at 06:00 am on the first postoperative day, at 06:00 am on the third postoperative day and at 06:00 am on the fifth postoperative day. White blood counts were analysed with automated differential counts. The NLR value was obtained by dividing the absolute neutrophil count and the absolute lymphocyte count. All participants were followed up to 30 days post-surgery to assess postoperative complications and readmission rate. After discharge, participants were called by phone, once a week. Postoperative complications were graded for incidence and severity using the Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications. Demographic and surgical data of the participants were recorded: age, sex, body weight, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class, nutritional status of the participants according to Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002), tumor localization and duration of surgery.
Interventions
DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTpreoperative nutrition
The participants of experimental group consumed 400 ml of a clear carbohydrate drink (12,5 gr/100 ml carbohydrate, 50 kcal/100 ml, pH 5.0) at 10:00 pm the evening before surgery and 200 ml of the carbohydrate drink on the day of surgery, 2 hours before induction of anesthesia. After surgery the participants fasted until the recovery of function of the bowel.
Sponsors
Nermina Rizvanović
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
The surgeons, anesthetists, and outcome assessors were masking to the treatment allocation. A nurse from the Department of Surgery performed the allocation into groups. The night before the operation, the nurse managed the patients according to the assigned intervention, but was not included in the study protocol. The next morning, the surgeon and anesthetist performed open elective colon surgery under general anesthesia, but without knowledge of the type of intervention. Independent outcomes assessors evaluated patients up to 30 days post-surgery and were also masked, without knowledge of the type intervention.
Intervention model description
The patients with diagnosed colon cancer were hospitalized and prepared for elective, open colon surgery at the Department of Surgery. Before surgical procedure, the patients were undergoing to a preoperative anesthetic visit. During the visit, participants were assessed according to eligibility for enrollment in the study. The participants who have met the eligibility criteria have explained the nature of the study protocol. Those who agreed to participate in the study were randomized to one of two study groups for the duration of the study.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* participants with diagnosed colorectal carcinoma scheduled for elective open colorectal surgery * aged between 18 years and 70 years * participants with ASA physical status class I-III
Exclusion criteria
* previous treatment of colon, rectum or any other cancer * emergency or palliative colon and rectum surgery * disseminated malignant disease * body mass index below 20 and above 30 kg/mᶺ2 * overall score ≥3 after final assessment of the nutritional status according to Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) * disease with increased risk of aspiration * history of diabetes mellitus * history of hematological disease * evidence of systemic inflammation * immunomodulatory therapy * neuromuscular disease * pregnancy * mental disease * allergy to any study drugs * alcoholic or drug abuse * patient's refusal to participate in the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The mean change in NLR values between conventional preoperative fasting protocol and a preoperative carbohydrate loading | fasting peripheral venous blood samples were collected at 06:00 am on the day of surgery (basal value), at 06:00 am on the first postoperative day, at 06:00 am on the third postoperative day and at 06:00 am on the fifth postoperative day. | White blood counts with automated differential counts were analysed from peripheral venous blood samples using fluorescence flow cytometry method. The NLR value was calculated by following equation: NLR = the absolute neutrophil count (range of normality 4,0-7,0x10ᶺ9/L) / the absolute lymphocyte count (range of normality 1-3,7x10ᶺ9/L). |
| The mean change in delta NLR value between conventional preoperative fasting protocol and a preoperative carbohydrate loading | fasting peripheral venous blood samples were collected at 06:00 am on the day of surgery (basal value), at 06:00 am on the first postoperative day, at 06:00 am on the third postoperative day and at 06:00 am on the fifth postoperative day. | Delta NLR value was defined as dynamic change in NLR value from basal value to the highest measured post-surgery NLR value. Delta NLR was calculated using following equation: Delta NRL = the highest measured post-surgery NLR value - basal NLR value. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The mean change in incidence and severity of postoperative complications assessed using the Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications between conventional preoperative fasting protocol and a preoperative carbohydrate loading | the incidence and severity of postoperative complications were assessed up to 30 days post-surgery. After discharge, participants were called by phone once a week and finally on the 30th day post-surgery. | Postoperative complications were graded as follow: Grade I considered any deviation from the normal course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic and radiologic interventions. Grade II required pharmacological treatment with drugs other than such allowed for Grade I complications. Grade I and Grade II were considered minor postoperative complications. Grade III required surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention without or with general anesthesia. Grade IV considered life-threatening complication required intensive care unit management. Grade V included death of patient. Grade III, IV and V were considered major complications. |
| The mean change in characteristics of postoperative complications between conventional preoperative fasting protocol and a preoperative carbohydrate loading | the characteristics of postoperative complications and readmission rate were assessed up to 30 days post-surgery. After discharge, participants were called by phone once a week and finally on the 30th day post-surgery. | Characteristics of postoperative complications included: overall number of complications per group, number of participants without complications per group, number of participants with complications per group, number of participants with 1 complication per group, number of participants with 2 complications per group, number of participants with \>2 complications per group and readmission rate per group within 30 days post-surgery. |
Countries
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Outcome results
None listed